Buradasınız

ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ PROSESİ VE PERSONEL SEÇİMİ ALANINDA UYGULAMALARI

THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Analytic Hierarchy Process is a multi criteria decision making method widely used in decision making. In this study primarily axioms, principles, steps and benefits of AHP are explained and some critics are stated. Then a literature review of the application of the analytic hierarchy process in personnel selection is presented. It is stated that AHP making possible by structuring decision hierarchy, developing priorities of criteria, evaluating intangible and tangible criteria together, determining inconsistencies of judgments and testing sensitivity of the decision model appears to be a useful tool for decision making in personnel selection.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) karar verme problemlerinde yaygın olarak kullanılan çok kriterli karar verme yöntemidir. Bu çalışmada öncelikle AHP’nin prensipleri, aksiyomları, uygulama aşamaları ve faydaları açıklanmış ve yapılan eletirilere yer verilmiştir. Sonraki bölümde personel seçimi konusunda AHP ile yapılan çalışmalar etraflıca incelenmiştir. Yöntemin, personel seçimi sürecinde karar hiyerarşisinin oluşturulmasına, kriter ağırlıklarının belirlenmesine, nicel ve nitel krierlerin birlikte değerlendirilmesine, yargıların tutarlılığının tespitine ve kurulan karar modelinin duyarlılığının testedilmesine imkan verdiğinden dolayı dolayı personel seçme sürecinde kullanılmasının faydalı olduğu tespitinde bulunulmuştur.
18-38

REFERENCES

References: 

Bali, Ö. ve Gencer, C. (2005). “AHP, Bulanık AHP ve Bulanık Mantık'la Kara
Harp Okuluna Öğretim Elemanı Seçimi”, Kara Harp Okulu Savunma
Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1): 24-41, www.kho.edu.tr/enstitu/SAVBEN_
Dergi/41.htm, (06.11.2009)
Bana e Costa, C. A. ve Vansnick, J-C. (2007), “A fundamental Criticism to
Saaty’s Use of the Eigenvalue Procedure to Derive Priorities”,
European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3): 1422-1428.
Barzilai, J. (2001). “Notes on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Proceedings of
the NSF Design and Manufacturing Conference, January 2001,
Tampa, Florida, 1-6.
Barzilai, J. ve Lootsma, F.A. (1997). “Power Relations and Group Aggregation
in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART”, Journal of Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis, 6(3): 155–165.
Chandran, B., Golden, B ve Wasil, E. (2005) “Linear Programming Models for
Estimating Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Computers &
Operations Research, 32(9), 2235-2254.
Chen, C-F. (2006). “Applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Approach to Convention Site Selection”, Journal of Travel Research,
45(2): 167-174.
Cheng, E. W. L ve Li, H. (2001) “Analytic Hierarchy Process: an Approach to
Determine Measures for Business Performance”, Measuring Business
Excellence, 3(3): 30-36.
Cheong, C. W., Jie, L. H., Meng, M. C. ve Lan, A. L. H. (2008). “Design and
Development of Decision Making System Using Fuzzy Analytic
Hierarchy Process”, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(7): 783-787.
Ö.F.ÜNAL/Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve Personel Seçimi…
16
Dyer, R. F., Forman, E. H. ve Mustafa, M. A. (1992). “Decision Support for
Media Selection Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Journal of
Advertising, 21(1): 59-70.
Dyer, J. S. (1990). “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”,
Management Science, 36(3): 249-258.
Forman, E. H ve Selly, M. A. (2001). Decision By Objectives (How To
Convince Others That You Are Right), World Scientific Pub. Co., USA,
Petersburg.
Forman, E. H. ve Gass, S. I. (2001). “The Analytic Hierarchy Process: An
Exposition”, Operations Research, 49(4): 469-486.
Garker, P. T. ve Vargas, L. G. (1987). “The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation:
Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, 33(11):
1383-1403.
Gibney, R. ve Shang, J. (2007) “Decision Making in Academia: A case of the
Dean Selection Process”, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 46
(7-8): 1030-1040.
Grandzol, J R. (2005), “Improving the Faculty Selection Process in Higher
Education: A Case for the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, IR
Applications, 6: 1-12, www.airweb.org/images/IR%20App6.pdf,
(29.10.2009)
Hahn, E. D. (2003). “Decision Making with Uncertain Judgments: A Stochastic
Formulation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Decision Sciences,
34(3): 443-466.
Harker, P. T. ve Vargas, L. G. (1990). “Reply to Remarks on the Analytic
Hierarchy Process by J. S. Dyer”, Management Science, 36(3): 269-273.
Hepler, C. ve Mazur, G. (2007), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process:
Methodologies and Application with Customers and Management at
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida”, The Nineteenth Symposium on
Quality Function Deployment, September 7-8, 2007 Williamsburg,
www.mazur.net/works/Hepler_Mazur_2007_AHP_with_Customers_an
d_Management.pdf, (23.12.2009)
Jabri, M. M. (1990). “Personnel Selection Using Insight - C: An Application
Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Journal of Business and
Psychology, 5(2): 281-285.
Keçek, G. ve Yıldırım, E. (2010).“Kurumsal Kaynak Planlama (ERP) Sisteminin
Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) ile Seçimi: Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir
Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 3/2(2011)18-38
17
Uygulama”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler
Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1): 193-211.
Kuruüzüm, A. ve Atsan, N. (2001). “Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi ve İşletmecilik
Alanındaki Uygulamaları”, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 1: 83-105.
Liberatore, M. J. ve Nydick, R. L. (1990). “An Analytic Hierarchy Approach for
Evaluating Product Formulations”, Chapter 7, Computer Aided
Formulation: A Manual for Implementation, VCH Publishing Company,
New York, www77.homepage.villanova.edu/robert.nydick/documents/
Chapter%20seven%20AHP%20Bohl%20Book.pdf, (18.09.2010)
Mamat, N. J. Z. ve Daniel, J.K. (2007). “Statistical Analyses on Time
Complexity and Rank Consistency Between Singular Value
Decomposition and The Duality Approach in AHP: a Case Study of
Faculty Member Selection”, Mathematical and Computer Modeling,
46(7-8): 1099-1106.
McIntyre, C. vd. (1990) “Applying Decision Support Software in Selection of
Division Director”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 15(2): 86-92.
Miller, G. A. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on
our Capacity for Processing Information”,
http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Miller/, (01.09.2009)
Newstrom, J. W. ve Davis, K. (2002). Organizational Behavior: Human
Behavior at Work, McGrow-Hill Yayınları, Uluslararası Edisyon, New
York.
Ozdemir, M. S. ve Saaty, T. L. (2006). “The Unknown in Decision Making
What to Do About It”, European Journal of Operational Reserarch,
174: 349-359.
Ozernoy, V. M. (1992). “Choosing the Best Multiple Criteria Decision-Making
Method”, INFOR, 30(2): 159-171.
Razmi, J. vd., (2002). “The New Concept of Manufacturing “DNA” within an
Analytic Hierarchy Process-Driven Expert System”, European Journal
of Innovation Management, 3(4): 199-211.
Russel, R. S. ve Taylor III, B. W.(2003). Operations Management, 4. Baskı,
Pearson Education International, New Jersey.
Saaty, T. L. (2008a). "Relative Measurement and its Generalization in
Decision Making: Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in
Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors - The Analytic
Hierarchy/Network Process", RACSAM (Review of the Royal Spanish
Ö.F.ÜNAL/Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve Personel Seçimi…
18
Academy of Sciences, Series A, Mathematics), 102(2): 251–318,
www.rac.es/ficheros/doc/00576. PDF, (18.09.2009)
Saaty, T. L. (2008b). “Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process”,
International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1): 83–98.
Saaty, T. L. (2007a). “Dispersion of Group Judgments”, Mathematical and
Computer Modelling, 46: 918-925.
Saaty, T. L. ve Tran, L. T. (2007b). “On the Invalidity of Fuzzifying Numerical
Judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Mathematical and Computer
Modelling, 46(7-8): 962-975
Saaty, T. L. (2006). “Rank from Comparisons and from Ratings in the
Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process”, European Journal of Operational
Research, 68: 557-570.
Saaty, T. L. (2005). “The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes
for the Measurement of Intangible Criteria and for Decision-Making,”
içinde Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys,
International Series in Operations Research & Management Science,
Figueira, J. vd. (der.), 78(4), Springer, Berlin, 345-405.
Saaty, T. L. ve Ozdemir, M. S. (2003a). “Why the Magic Number Seven Plus
or Minus Two”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38: 233-244.
Saaty, T. L. ve Ozdemir, M. S. (2003b). “Negative Priorities in the Analytic
Hierarchy Process”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37(9-10):
1063-1075.
Saaty, T. L. (2001). “Deriving the AHP 1-9 Scale from First Principles”, ISAHP
2001, Berne, Switzerland, Ağustos 2-4, 2001,
www.creativedecisions.net/papers/papers_etc/Bern_Scale_1-9_.doc,
(23.09.2009)
Saaty, T. L. (1999). “Basic Theory of The Analytic Hierarchy Process: How to
Make a Decision”, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat. (Esp), 93(4):
395-423, 1999,
http://dmle.cindoc.csic.es/pdf/RRACEFN_1999_93_04_02.pdf,
(18.12.2009)
Saaty, T. L. (1990). “How to Make a Decision: the Analytic Hierarchy
Process”, European Journal of Operation Research, 48: 9–26.
Saaty, T. L. (1986). “Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy
Process”, Management Science, 32(7), 841-855.
Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 3/2(2011)18-38
19
Saaty,T. L. “The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process”,
www.creativedecisions.net/papers/papers_etc/SevenPillars.doc,
23.09.2009.
Saaty, T. L. “How to Make a Decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process”,
http://sigma.poligran.edu.co/politecnico/apoyo/Decisiones/curso/Inte
rfaces.pdf, 23.09.2009.
Swiercz, P. M. ve Ezzedeen, S. R. (2001). “From Sorcery to Science: AHP, a
Powerful New Tool for Executive Selection”, Human Resource
Planning, 24(3): 15-26.
Swiercz, P. M. ve Ezzedeen, S. R. (2001). “From Sorcery to Science: AHP, a
Powerful New Tool for Executive Selection”, Human Resource
Planning, 24(3): 15-26.
Tavana, M. vd. (1996). “A Group Decision Support Framework for Consensus
Ranking of Technical Manager”, International Journal of Management,
24(5): 523-538
Taylor III, F. A. vd. (1990). “Personnel evaluation with AHP”, Management
Decision, 36(10): 679-685.
Teymur, M ve Tüzüner, L. (2006). “Sales Representative Selection of
Pharmaceutical Firms by Analytic Hierarchy Process”, The Journal of
American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 8(1): 287-293.
Ülengin, F. (1992) “Ulaşım Problemlerinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Yaklaşımı:
İstanbul İçin Bir Uygulama”, TMMOB İstanbul 2. Kent İçi Ulaşım
Kongresi Bildirileri, 103-121.
Vila, J. ve Beccue, B. (1995) “Effect of Visualization on the Decision Maker
When Using Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Proceedings of the 28th
Hawaii International Conferance on System Sciences, 1995,
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.5562
&rep=rep1&type=pdf, (13.09.2009)
Wang, Y-M. ve Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). “An Approach to Avoiding Rank
Reversal in AHP” Decision Support Systems, 42(3): 1474-1480.
Warren, L. (2004). “Uncertainties in the Analytic Hierarchy Process”,
Australian Government Department of Defence, Defence Science and
Technology Organisation Information Science Laboratory, 1-22,
http://dspace.dsto.defence.gov.au/dspace/bitstream/1947/3553/1/
DSTO-TN-0597%20PR.pdf, (06.11.2009)
Wind, Y ve Saaty, T. L. (1980) “Marketing Application of the Analytic
Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, 26(7): 641-658.
Ö.F.ÜNAL/Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve Personel Seçimi…
20
Winkler, R. L. (1990). “Decision Modeling and Rational Choice: AHP and
Utility Theory”, Management Science, 36(3):274-275
Zahedi, F. M. (1986). “The Analytic Hierarchy Process A Survey of the Method
and its Application”, Interfeces, 16 (Temmuz-Ağustos): 96-108.
Zahedi, F. M. (1997). “Reliability Metric for Information System Based on
Customer Requirements”, International Journal of Quality and
Reliability Management, 14(8): 791-813.
Zkarian, A ve Kusiak, A. (1999). “Forming Teams: an Analytical Approach”,
IIE Transactions, 31(1): 85-97.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com