Amin, H. (2007). Extending the technology acceptance model for SMS banking: analyzing the gender gap among students. International Journal of Business and Society, 8(1), 15–27.
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. (2001). http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
Costa, C., Alvelos, H., Teixeira, L. (2012). The use of Moodle e-learning platform: a study in a Portuguese University. Procedia Technology 5. 334 – 343.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quartely, 13(3), 319–340.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
Dillon, A. & Morris, M. (1998). From "can they" to "will they?": Extending usability evaluation to address acceptance. In E. D. Hoadley & B. Izak (Eds.), Proceedings Association for Information Systems Conference. Baltimore, MD.
Gao, Y. (2005). Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) to educational hypermedia: a field study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14(3), 237-247. http://www.editlib.org/p/5902
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L. & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91-112.
McKinnon, K. & Igonor, A. (2008). Explaining eLearning perceptions using the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior. In C. Bonk et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2008. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. http://www.editlib.org/p/30092
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior. 45. 359–374.
Moodle (2011). http://www.moodle.org/
Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217–230.
Morris, M. & Dillon, A. (1997). How user perceptions influence software use. IEEE Software,14(4), 58-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/52.595956
Paragina, F., Paragina, S., Jipa, A., Savu, T, & Dumitrescu, A. (2011). The benefits of using MOODLE in teacher training in Romania. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15 , 1135–1139.
Park, S.Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society. 12(3): p. 150-162.
B1 Seviyesinde İngilizceyi Yabancı Dil Olarak
© 2017 JLERE, Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi- Journal of Language Education and Research, 3(S), 40-51
51
Persico, D., Manca, S., & Pozzi, F. (2014). Adapting the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior 30. 614–622.
Rice, W. (2006). Moodle – E-Learning Course Development. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.
Rice, W. (2007). Moodle Teaching Techniques – Creative Ways to Use Moodle for Constructing Online Learning Solutions. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.
Robescu, D.T. (2011). Deploying Moodle Capabilities to Showcase Interactive Content and
Language Learning in the Engineering Students’ Foreign Language Training. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 15. 1153–1157.
Rodriguez, T.E., & Lozano, P.L. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education 58.1085–1093.
Sánchez-Franco, M. J., & Roldán, J. L. (2005). Web acceptance and usage model: A comparison between goal-directed and experiential web users. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 15(1), 21–48.
Sanchez, R.A., & Hueros, A.D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), p. 1632-1640.
Shroff, R.H., Deneen, C.C., & Eugenia M. W. (2011). Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students’ behavioural intention to use an eportfolio system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 600-618.
Sugar, W., Crawley, F. & Fine, B. (2004). Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 201-213. http://www.ifets.info/journals/7_4/19.pdf
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2013). User Acceptance Towards Web-based Learning Systems: Investigating the role of Social, Organizational and Individual factors in European Higher Education. Procedia Computer Science 17, 189 – 197.
Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(1), 302–312.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com