You are here

Öğrenci ve Öğretmenlerin Eğitimin Etkinliğine İlişkin Algılamaları

STUDENTS' AND TEACHERS' PERCEPTIONS ON TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Mostly, students' perception and in some cases, teachers' perception are commonly used in evaluating the ejficiency of educational activities. The similarty between students and teachers 'perception of educational activities can be regarded as an indicator for the ejficiency of the perception based training evaluation. The aim of this research is to find out the similarities and differences between teachers (n~58) and students (n=510) ideas of educational activities in three high schools in İstanbul. Educational activities and teachers ' ejficiency were evaluated by a scale which consisls five categories and was fortned by the ideas of experts and related publications. Categories are; (1) Course Content and Learning Objectives (2) Personal Traits (3) Teachers' Siyle of Leadership (4) Course Outcomes and Assesment (5) Professionalism. The results show how different the teachers' and students' evaluations are in ali categories mentioned above. Moreover, teachers' evaluations have been more positive (han sudents
Abstract (Original Language): 
Eğitim faaliyetlerinin etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesinde,özellikle öğrencilerin ve bazı durumlarda da öğretmenlerin algılamaları yaygın biçimde kullanılmaktadır. Öğrenci ve öğretmenlerin eğitim faaliyetlerine ilişkin algılarının benzerlîği.algılara dayalı eğitim değerlemesinin etkinliğinin bir göstergesi olarak kabul edilebilir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, İstanbul'daki üç işenin Öğretmenleri(n-58) ve öğrencilerinin(n=510) eğitim faaliyetlerine ilişkin düşüncelerini ve bu düşüncelerindeki benzerlik ve farklılıkları belirlemektir. Eğitim faaliyetleri ve öğretmenlerin etkinliği, ilgili yazın ve uzman/katılmacı görüşlerinden yararlanılarak oluşturulan ve beş kategori veya boyutu içeren bir Ölçeğe göre değerlenmiştir. Değerleme boyutları; (1) Kurs(ders) İçeriği ve öğrenme hedefleri (2) Kişilik özellikleri (3) Öğretmen liderlik tarzı (4) Kurs sonuçları ve değerlendirme (5) Profesyonellik, olarak belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre,öğretmen ve öğrencilerin değerlendirmeleri tüm boyutlarda anlamlı bir farklılık göstermektedir. Ayrıca, öğretmenlerin değerlemeleri tüm boyutlarda göreli olarak daha 11 olumlu" dur.
8-26

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, W.T., Alpert M.I. & Golden, L.L. 1977, A comparative analysis
of student-teacher interpersonal similarity/dissirnilarity and teaching
effectiveness, The Journal of Educational Research, 71 (1): 36-44.
Bakeman, Roger. Understanding Statistics in the Behavioral Sciences;
Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Incorporated, 2005. p
46. Http://site.ebrary.com/lib/istanbul/Doc?id=10106609&ppg=63
Baldwhı, T.T. and Ford, J.K. 1988, Transfer of Training: a review and
directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105.
Ben Said, Selim; Attitudes towards accented speech: A comparative study of
native and non-native speakers of American English; M.A., Southern
Illinois University at Carbondale, 2006,139 pages; AAT 1437485
16
Biggs, J. B. 1993, What do inventories of students' learning processes
really ıneasure? A theoretical review and clarification. Educational
Psychology, 63, 3-19.
Blass, T. 1980, What do positive correlations between student grades and
teacher evaluations mean?, Teaching of Psychology; 7,186-187.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. 1989, Situated cognition and the
culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32—43.
Carey, J.O. & Gregory, V.L. 2003, Toward improving student learning:
policy İssues and design structures in course-levcl outcomes assessment.
Assessment &. Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (3): 215-227.
Cohen, P.A. 1982, Validity of student ratings in psychology courses: A
research synthesis. Teaching of Psychology, 9, 78-82.
Desphande, A.S., Webb, S.C., and Marks, F. 1970, Student Perceptions of
Engineering Instructor Behaviors and Their Relationships to the
Evaluation of Instructors and Courses. American Educational Research
Journal, 1, 289-306.
d'Apollonia, S. and Abrami, P. 1997, Navigating student ratings of
instruction. American Psychologist, 52,1198-1208.
Dunn, R & Dunn, K. 1991, Teaching Students Through Their Individual
Learnhıg Styles: A Practical Approach. VA: Rcston Publishing.
Dunn-Rankin, Peter. Scaling Methods; Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Incorporated, 2004. p 105.
http://site.ebrary.com/lib/istanbul/Doc?id=10084538&ppg=120
Esene, Meriç Balam; Professor's Teaching Effectiveness in Reiation to Self
-Effiacy Beliefs and Perceptions of Student Rating Myths, Doctoral
Dissertation, Graduate Faculty of Auburn University; Aubura,Albama,
2006
Felder, R.M. 1993, Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching
Styles in College Science Education, Journal of College Science
Teaching 23(5), 286-290.
Felder, R.M. and Silverman, L.K. 1988, Learning and Teaching Styles In
Engineering Education, Engineering Education, 78 (7): 674-681.
17
Fitzpatrick, JJ. 2004, Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness, Nursing
Education Perspectives, 25 (3): 109.
Ford, J. ÎC and D. A. Weissbein 1997, Transfer of Training: An Updated
Review and Analysis, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10, 2, 22¬
41.
Fulcher, E).G. and Anderson, Thomas 1974, Interpersonal dissimilarity and
teaching effectiveness: a relational analysis. The Journal of Educational
Research, 68 (1): 19-25.
Greenwald, A.G. 1997, Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings
of instruction. American Psychologist, 52,1182—1186.
Greenwald, A.G., and Gillmore, G.M. 1997, Grading leniency is a
removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52,
1209-1217.
Greimel-Fuhrmann, B. and Geyer, A. 2003, Students' Evaluation of
Teachers and Instructional Ouality-Analysis of Relevant Factors Based
on Empİrİcal Evaluation Research, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
Education, 28 (3), 229-238.
Hail, D.T. 1970, The effect of teacher-Student Congruence upon Student
Learning İn College Cİasses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61,
205-215.
Hicks, W.D. and Klimoskİ, R.J. 1987, Entry into training programs and its
effects on training outcomes: Afield experiment. Academy of
Management Journal, 30, 542-552.
Isaacson, R.L., McKeachie, W.J. and Milholland, J.F. 1963, Correlation of
Teacher Personality variables and Student Ratings. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 54,110-117.
Holmes, Susan Posey; Student and Faculty of Clinical Teaching
Effectiveness of Full-Tİme and Part-Time Baccaluarete Degree Clinical
Nursing Faculty; Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate Faculty of Auburn
University; Aubum,Albama, 2006
18
Isaacson, R.L., McKeachie, W.J. MUholland, J.F. Un, Y.G., Hofeller, M.f
Baenvaldt, J.W. and Zinn, K.L. 1964, Dimensions of Student Evaluation
ofTeaching, Journal ofEducational Psychology, 55, 344-351,
Kaplan, EJ. and Kies, D.A. 1995, Teaching Styles and Learning Styles:
Which Came First?, Journal of Instructhnal Psychology, 22 (1): 29-34.
Kolb, D.A. 1984, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of
Learning and Deveîopment. NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Kumcu, Erdoğan; Dağıtım Kanallarında Çatışma Süreci, İÜ İşletme
Fakültesi Pazarlama Enstitüsü Yayını No:16, İstanbul, 1981, s.131-132
Kurtuluş, Kemal; Pazarlama Araştırmaları, ö.Basım, Literatür Yayıncılık,
îstanbul,2006,s.435-485
Leinthal, C:T., Lansky, I.M., and Andrews, O.F. 1971, Student Evaluations
of Teacher Behaviors as Estimation of Real ideal Discrepancies, A
Critique of Teacher Rating Methods. Journal of Educational Psychology,
62,104-109.
Lim, D.H. and Wentîing, R.M. 1998, International Transfer of Training:
modification of training programmes for multinational hotel chains in
Korea, International Journal of Training and Deveîopment, 2(1), pp. 17¬
27.
Marsh, H.W. and Roche, L.A. 1997, Making students' evaluations of
teaching effectiveness effective: The critical İssues of validity, bias, and
utility. American Psychologist, 52,1187-1197.
Marshall, J. 1987, The Examination of a Learning Style Typology,
Research in Higher Education, 26: 417-429.
Marton, F. & Saljo R. 1976, On qualitative differences İn learning - 1 :
Outcomes and Processes, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46:
4-11
McKeachie, W.J. 1997, Student ratings: The validity of use. American
Psychologist, 52,1218-1225.
19
Mathieu, J.E., Tannenabaum, S.I. and Salaş, E. 1992, rnfluences of
individual and situational characteristics on measures of training
effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 828-847.
McKeachie, W.J. 1997, Student ratings: The validity of use. American
Psychologist, 52,1218-1225.
Noe, R. A. and N. Schraitt 1986, [The Irıfluence of Trainee Attitudes on
Training Effectiveness:Test of a Model', Personnel Psychology, 39, 497¬
523.
Ö'Lcary, Zina. Essential Guİde to Doing Research;London,, GBR: Sage
Publications, Incorporated; 2004. p 189.
http://site.ebrary.corn/lib/istanbulÂ)oc?id=10080869&ppg=199
Penny, A. 2003, Changing the agenda for research into students' views about
university teaching: four shortcomings of SRT research, Teaching in
Higher Education, 8 (3): 399-411.
Pohlman, J.T. 1975, A Multivariate Analysis of Selected Class
Characteristics and Student Ratings of Instruction. Multivariate
Behavioral Research, 10, 81-92.
Reinert, H. 1976, One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words? Not
Necessarily!, The Modern Language Journal 60,160-168.
Richardson, J.T.E. 1990, Reliabiîity and replicability of the approaches to
Studying Ojuestionnaire, Studies in High Education, 15:155-168.
Roîlins, Stephanie Havron; Alabama Virtual Library lobbyists' and state
legislators' perceptions of effective state lobbying strategies D.P.A., The
University of Alabama, 2006,113 pages; AAT 3223322
Sadler-Smith, E. and Riding, R. 1999, Cognitive Style and Instructional
Preferences. Instructional Science 27: 355-371.
Sexton, M J. and Switzer, K.D.D. 1977, Educational leadership: no longer a
potpourri, Educational Leadership, 19-24.
20
Solomon, D. 1966, Teacher Behavior Dimensions, Course Characteristics,
and Student Evaluations of Teachers. American Educational Research
Journal, 3, 35-47.
Şencan, Hüner; Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve
Geçerlilik; Seçkin Yayınları, İstanbul, 2005,s.82
Tziner, A., Haccoun, R.R. and Kadish, A. 1991, Personal and situational
characteristics influencing the effectiveness of transfer of training
improvement strategies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 167¬
177.
Wehling, L, J. and Charters, W.W.Jr. 1969, Dİmentions of Teacher Belİefs
about the Teaching Process. American Educational Research Journal, 6,
7-30.
Woelfel, K.D. 2003, Student Learning Outcomes in a Learner-Centered
Genetics Classroom. Education, 124Issue 1:17-31.
Worthen, B. and Sanders, J. 1987, Educational evaluation: alternative
approaches and practical guidelines. NY: Pitman Publishing.
Worthingîon, A.G., and Wong, P.T.P. 1979, Effects of earned and assigned
grades on student evaluations on an instructor. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 71, 764-775.
Wynd, W„R. and Bozman, C.S. 1996, Student Learning Style: A
Segmentation Strategy for Higher Education, Journal of Education for
Business, 71 (4): 232-236.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com