Altun, A. (2000). Patterns in cognitive process and strategies in hypertext reading: A
case study of two experienced computer users. Journal of Educational
Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9 (1), 35-55.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001). Deneysel desenler. Ankara: Pegem A.
Clark, R. C. (2003). Authorware, multimedia and instructional
methods.http://www.macromedia.com/support/authorware/basics/instruct/ind
ex.html adresinden 12 Nisan 2003 tarihinde alınmıştır.
Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey. IEEE Computer, 20(9), 17-41.
Daniels, H. L. ve Moore, D. M. (2000). Interaction of cognitive style and learner control
in a hypermedia environment. International Journal of Instructional Media.,
27(4), 369-383.
Dede, C. ve Lewis, M. (1995). Assessment of Emerging Educational Technologies That
Might Assist and Enhance School-to-Work Transitions.Washington, DC:
National Technical Information Service.
Demirbilek, M. (2004). Effects of interface windowing modes and individual differences
on disorientation and cognitive load in a hypermedia learning environment.
YayınlanmamışDoktora Tezi. University of Florida.
De Troyer, O. (1998). Designing well-structured web site: Lessons to be learned
fromdatabase schema methodology, ERÕ98 Conference, Lecture Notes in
Computer Science (LNCS), Springer-Verlag.
De Vries, E. ve De Jong, T. (1999). The design and evaluation of hypertext structures
for supporting design problem solving. Instructional Science, 27,285-302.
Jonassen, D. H., ve Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers
as cognitive tools. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on
educational communications and technology(s. 693-719). NewYork:
Macmillan.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 26, Sayı3(2006) 251-262 262
Kılıç, E. ve Karadeniz, Ş. (2004). Hiper Ortamlarda Öğrencilerin Bilişsel Yüklenme ve
Kaybolma Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Kuram ve Uygumalada Eğitim
Yönetimi Dergisi, 40, 562-579.
McDonald, S. ve Stevenson, R. J. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: the effects of
three text structures on navigating performance. Applied Ergonomics, 27(1),
61-68.
Paas, F. ve Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions:
An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human
Factors, 35(4), 737-743.
Paas, F., Renkl, A. ve Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional
implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive
architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H. ve Van Germen, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load
measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational
Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
Rogers, P. L. (2001). Designing Instruction for Technology Enhanced Learning. IRM
Pres: London.
Shapiro, A. (1998). Promoting Active Learning: The Role of System Structure in
Learning from Hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(1), 1-36.
Shapiro, A. ve Niederhauser, D. (2003). How studies of hypertext-assisted learning
inform educational system design.25. Annual Meeting of Cognitive Science
Society Conference, 31 July-3 August, Boston.
Shapiro, A. ve Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and
findings. D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational
communications and technology(s.605-620). Mahwah, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shu-Sheng, L. (2001). Designing the hypermedia-based learning environments.
International Journal of Educational Multimedia, 28(1). 43-57.
Kommers, P. A. M. (2002). Four stages in designing educational hypermedia. In Orhun,
E. ve Kommers, P. A. M.(Editors). Information and Communication
Technologies in Education: A Focus on Cognitive Tools. (s.29-61). İzmir,
Türkiye: Ege Üniversitesi.
Tolhurst, D. (1995). Hypertext, hypermedia, multimedia defined?. Educational
Tsechnology, 35(2), 21-26.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
