You are here

Home » Content

Farklı enerji yoğunluklarındaki KTP lazer uygulaması sonrası kompozit restorasyonlardaki mikrosızıntı

Microleakage of composite restorations after application of different KTP laser energy densities

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate microleakage in Class V cavities pretreated with different KTP (potassium–titanyl–phosphate) laser energy densities before acid etching application. Material–Method: Thirty–two human premolars were selected for cavity pretreatment. After Class V cavity restorations in buccal and lingual surfaces, teeth were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1: 1 W, 7.1 J/ cm2 KTP laser, 37% phosphoric acid and Single Bond; Group 2: 1.5 W, 10.7 J/cm2 KTP laser, 37% phosphoric acid and Single Bond; Group 3: 2 W, 14.2 J/cm2 KTP laser, 37% phosphoric acid and Single Bond; Group 4: 37% phosphoric acid and Single Bond. The cavities were restored with composite resin. The teeth were then thermocycled for 500 cycles, isolated and immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 h. After this period, the teeth were rinsed, dried, and sectioned, and microleakage was assessed by dye penetration at the occlusal and gingival surface of the teeth with stereomicroscope (X6). Data were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests for independent samples, and Wilcoxon test for dependent samples. Results: When microleakage at the enamel margins of all groups were compared, no statistical differences were found (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between Groups 3 and 4 (p<0.05) when the scores of microleakage at the cementum margins of the four groups were compared; however, no other groups showed statistically significant differences between them (p>0.05). Discussions: None of the procedures tested in this study completely eliminated microleakage. KTP laser irradiation prior to acid etching to dentin following cavity preparation reduced mean microleakage values compared with acid etching alone at the enamel and the cementum margins.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Sınıf V kavitelerin asitle pürüzlendirilmesi öncesinde uygulanan farklı enerji yoğunluklarındaki KTP (potasyum–titanil–fosfat) lazer ile mikrosızıntıyı değerlendirmektir. Materyal–Metod: 32 tane premolar diş kavite preparasyonu için seçildi. Bukkal ve lingual yüzeylere Sınıf V kaviteler açıldıktan sonra, dişler rastgele 4 gruba ayrıldı. Grup 1: 1 W, 7,1 J/cm2 KTP lazer, %37 fosforik asit ve Single Bond; Grup 2: 1,5 W, 10,7J/cm2 KTP lazer, %37 fosforik asit ve Single Bond; Grup 3: 2 W, 14,2 J/cm2 KTP lazer, %37 fosforik asit ve Single Bond; Grup 4: %37 fosforik asit ve Single Bond. Bütün kaviteler kompozit rezin ile restore edildi. Dişlere daha sonra 500 kez termal siklus uygulandı ve 24 saat %0,5’lik bazik fuksinde bekletildi. Bu işlemden sonra, dişler yıkandı, kurulandı ve kesildi ve dişlerin oklüzal ve gingival yüzeylerinde boya penetrasyonu ile oluşan mikrosızıntı stereomikroskop altında değerlendirildi (X6). Elde edilen veriler bağımsız örnekler için Kruskal–Wallis ve Mann–Whitney U testi, bağımlı örnekler için ise Wilcoxon testi yapıldı. Bulgular: Bütün gruplarda mine marjininde oluşan mikrosızıntı değerleri karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p>0,05). Bütün gruplarda sement marjinindeki mikrosızıntı değerleri karşılaştırıldığında ise, Grup 3 ve Grup 4 arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunurken (p<0,05), diğer gruplar ile arasındaki fark anlamlı bulunmadı (p>0,05). Tartışma: Bu çalışmada kullanılan yöntemlerin hiçbirisi mikrosızıntıyı önleyemedi. Kavite preperasyonu sonrası asit etching uygulamasından önce KTP lazer uygulaması ile mine ve sement marjinlerinde elde edilen mikrosızıntı değerlerinin, sadece asitle pürüzlendirme sonrası elde edilen değerlere göre azaldığı görüldü.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 3485-14813-1-pb.pdf
  • 3
119-125
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Pashley DH. Interaction of dental materials with
dentin. Trans Am Acad Dent Mater 1990; 3:55–73.
2. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russel CM. Shear bond
strength required to prevent microleakage at the
dentin/restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994; 7:43–46.
3. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasinf
the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel
surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849–853.
4. Kytridou V, Gutmann JL, Nunn MH. Adaptation
and sealability of two contemporary obturation
techniques in the absence of the dentinal smear
layer. Int Endod J 1999; 32:464–474.
5. Rinaudo PJ, Cochran MA, Moore BK. The effect of
air abrasion on shear bond strength to dentin with
dental adhesives. Oper Dent 1997; 22:254–259.
6. Salama FS. Effect of laser pretreated enamel
and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of
different restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent
1998; 22:285–291.
7. Mercer C. Lasers in dentistry: A review. Part 2:
Diagnosis, treatment and research. Dent Update
1996; 23:120–125.
8. Roodenburg JL, Panders AK, Vermey A. Carbon
dioxide laser surgery of oral leukoplakia. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
1991; 71:670–674.
9. Eversole LR, Rizoiu IM. Preliminary investigations
on the utility of an erbium, chromium YSGG laser.
J Calif Dent Assoc 1995; 23:41–47.
124
Farklı enerji yoğunluklarındaki KTP lazer uygulaması sonrası
kompozit restorasyonlardaki mikrosızıntı
Alper Kuştarcı ve ark.
10. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe
H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H. Comparison
between Er: YAG laser and conventional technique
for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 1998;
77:1404–1414.
11. Visuri SR, Gilbert JL, Wright DD, Wigdor HA,
Walsh JT Jr. Shear strength of composite bonded to
Er: YAG laser–prepared dentin. J Dent Res 1996;
75:599–605.
12. Dederich DN. Lasers in dentistry. Alpha Omegan
1991; 84:33–36.
13. Schoop U, Kluger W, Dervisbegovic S, Goharkhay
K, Wernisch J, Georgopoulos A, Sperr W, Moritz A.
Innovative wavelengths in endodontic treatment.
Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38:624–630.
14. Kuştarci A, Sümer Z, Altunbaş D, Koşum S.
Bactericidal effect of KTP laser irradiation against
Enterococcus faecalis compared with gaseous
ozone: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107:73–79.
15. Tewfik HM, Pashley DH, Horner JA, Sharawy
MM. Structural and functional changes in root
dentin following exposure to KTP/532 laser. J
Endod 1993; 19:492–497.
16. Momoi Y, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from light–
activated glass ionomer restorative cements. Dent
Mater 1993; 9:151–154.
17. Watts A. Bacterial contamination and the toxicity
of silicate and zinc phosphate cements. Braz Dent
J 1979; 146:7–13.
18. Brännström M. The cause of postrestorative
sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986;
12:475–481.
19. Palma Dibb RG, Corona SA, Borsatto MC,
Ferreira KC, Pereira Ramos R, Djalma Pécora J.
Assessing microleakage on class V composite
resin restorations after Er: YAG laser preparation
varying the adhesive systems. J Clin Laser Med
Surg 2002; 20:129–133.
20. Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Palma Dibb RG, Ramos
RP, Brugnera A, Pécora JD. Microleakage on
class V resin composite restorations after bur,
airabrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper
Dent 2001; 26:491–497.
21. Siso HS, Kustarci A, Göktolga EG. Microleakage
in resin composite restorations after antimicrobial
pre–treatments: effect of KTP laser, chlorhexidine
gluconate and Clearfil Protect Bond. Oper Dent
2009; 34:321–327.
22. González BJ, Ruiz PM, Rodríguez NJ, Martín BB,
Varela PP, Magán MF, Bahillo VM, Barciela CN. A
comparative study of microleakage through enamel
and cementum after laser Er:YAG instrumentation
in class V cavity obturations, using scanning
electron microscopy. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2002;
20:197–201.
23. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson CL.
Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas
available for bonding in Class V and in Class II
preparations. J Dent 1997; 25:379–389.
24. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage
around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent
1997; 22:173–185.
25. Piva E, Martos J, Demarco FF. Microleakage in
amalgam restorations: influence of cavity cleanser
solutions and anticariogenic agents. Oper Dent
2001; 26:383–388.
26. Obeidi A, Ghasemi A. Azima A, Ansari G.
Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser on microleakage
of composite restorations in class V cavities.
Photomed Laser Surg 2005; 23:56–59.
27. Miserendino LJ, Levy GC, Rizoiu LM. Effects of
Nd: YAG laser on the permeability of root canal
wall dentin. J Endod 1995; 21:83–87.
28. Gonçalves SE, Araújo MA, Damião AJ. Dentin
bond strength: Influence of laser irradiation, acid
etching and hipermineralization. J Laser Med Surg
1999; 17:77–85.
29. Cooper LF, Myers ML, Nelson DGA, Mowery
AS. Shear strength of composite bonded to laser–
prepared dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60:45–49.
30. Ribeiro CF, Anido AA, Rauscher FC, Yui KC,
Gonçalves SE. Marginal leakage in class V cavities
pretreated with different laser energy densities.
Photomed Laser Surg 2005; 23:313–316.
31. White JM, Goodis HE. Laser interactions with
dental hard tissues–effects on the pulp/dentin
complex. In: Proceedings of the International
Conference on the Dentin Pulp Complex, Tokyo,
Japan. 1996; 41–50.
32. Goodman BD, Gwinnett AJ. A comparison of laser
and acid–etch human enamel. Archs Oral Biol
1977; 22:215–220.
33. Frentzen M, Winkelsträter C, van Benthem H,
Koort HJ. The effects of pulsed ultraviolet and
infra–red lasers on dental enamel. Eur J Prosthodent
Rest Dent 1996; 4:99–104.
34. Yazici R, Frentzen M, Dayangac B. In vitro
125
Farklı enerji yoğunluklarındaki KTP lazer uygulaması sonrası
kompozit restorasyonlardaki mikrosızıntı
Alper Kuştarcı ve ark.
analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on
microleakage around composite resin restorations.
J Dent 2001; 29:355–361.
35. Corpas–Paster L, Moreno V, Garrido JDLG,
Pedraza Muriel V, Moore K, Elias A. Comparing
the tensile strength of brackets adhered to laser–
etched enamel vs. acid–etched enamel. JADA
1997; 128:732–737.
36. Martinez–Insua A, Daminguez L, Rivera FG,
Santana–Penín UA. Differences in bonding to
acid–etched or Er:YAG laser–treated enamel and
dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:280–288.
37. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW.
Microleakage of composite restorations after acid
or Er:YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater
2001; 17:340–346.
38. Armengol V, Jean A, Rohanizadeh R, Hamel H.
Scanning electron microscopic analysis of diseased
and healthy dental hard tissues after Er:YAG laser
irradiation: In vitro study. J Endod 1999; 25:543–
546.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com