You are here

Home » Content

KAVİTE DEZENFEKTANI UYGULAMASININ FARKLI DENTİN ADEZİV SİSTEMLERİN MİKROSIZINTISINA ETKİSİ

EFFECT OF CAVITY DISINFECTANT APPLICATION ON MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERENT DENTIN ADHESIVE SYSTEMS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ch/orhexidine containing cavity disinfectant application on the microleakage of two different adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. 40 Class V cavities were prepared in buccal and lingual surfaces of 20 recently extracted human third molars. The occlusal wall was located nn enamel and the cervical wal was located nn dentin. Teeth were randomly assigned to 6 groups of 10 cavities according to the cavity disinfection procedures and the adhesives used each as follows: Group 1: 37 % phosphoric acid etching, etch&rinse adhesive (Excite DSC Single Dose) Group 2: Self-etch adhesive (AdheSE); Group 3:Acid etching, cavtty disinfectant application (Cavity Cleanser), etch&rinse adhesive; Group 4: cavity disinfectant application, self-etch adhesive. After the respective pretreatment procedures, al the cavities were restorated with a nanohybrid composite (Tetric Evo Ceram). The specimens were thermocycled 500 times (5-550C) and then were immersed nn 0,5% basic fuchsin for twenty-four hours. After rinsing, the restorations were longitudinally sectioned and dye penetration was assessed under a stereomicroscope (40x). Data were anatyzed by Kruskal-Wa/its and Mann-Whttney U tests. There was no significant difference between the microleakage scores of the restorations, received no pretreatment after cavtty preparation and cavtty disinfectant application at occlusal and gingival margnns(p>0.05). No significant differences was also observed between the adhesive systems used(p>0.05). Cavity disinfectant application didn't significantly affect the microleakage of etch &rnnse and self-etch adhesive systems in class V composite restorations.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu nn vitro çalışmanın amacı, k/orheksidin içeren kavtte dezenfektanı uygulamasının iki farklı adeziv sistem kullanılarak yapı/an sınıf V kompozit restorasyonların mikrosızıntısına etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. 20 adet çekilmiş üçüncü moaar insan dişinin bukkal ve lingual yüzey/erine 40 adet Class V kavtte preparasyonu yapldı. Kavite/erin okluzal marjinleri minede gingiva/ marjinleri dentnnde olacak şekilde hazır/andı. Dişler, her grupta 10 kavtte olacak şekilde rastgele 4 gruba ayr/ldı: Grup 1: % 37 fosforik asit ile pürüzlendrrme, etch&rnnse adhesive (Excite DSC Single Dose) Grup 2: Self-etch adesiv (AdheSE); Grup 3: Asitle pürüzlendrrme, kavtte dezenfektanı uygulaması (Cavtty Cleanser), etch&rnnse adeziv, Grup 4: kavtte dezenfektanı uygulaması, self-etch adeziv. Bu uygu/amaları takiben bütün kaviteler nanohibrid yapıda bir kompozit rezinfTetric Evoceram) ile restore edildi. Hazrraanan örneklere 500 kez termal sik/us (5-550C) uygulandıktan sonra örnekler %% 0.5lik bazik fuksin solusyonunda 24 saat bekletildi. Daha sonra dişler yıkanıp, bukkotingual yönde dikey olarak kesilerek stereomikroskop altında ince/endi (X40).Boya penetrasyon dereceleri kaydedildi. Alınan sonuç/ar Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann-Whttney-U testi ile istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Çalışmanın sonucunda, kavtte preparasyo-nundan sonra herhangi brr işlem uygulanma- yan restorasyonlarla kavtte dezenfektanı uygulanan örneklerin okluzal ve gingival marginlerindeki sızıntı dereceleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı brr fark saptanmadı(p>0.05). Bununla birlikte, kulan lan adeziv sistemlerin arasındaki fark anlamlı bulunmadı (p> 0.05). Kavtte dezenfektanı uygulamasının etch & rinse ve seff-etch adeziv sistemler kullanılarak yapılan sınıf V kompozit restorasyonların kenar sızıntısına brr etkisi bulunmamaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kavite-dezenfektani-uygulamasinin-farkli-dentin-adeziv-sistemlerin-mikrosizintisina-etkisi.pdf
  • 2
7-12
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Introduction to composite restorations. 'Sturdevant's,7he art and science of operative dentistry' (Ed. T.M. Robenson, H.O. Heymann, EJ. Swfft), IV. Bask, Mosby Inc., Missouri, 2002; 473-499.
2. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Felzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J. Dent. Res. 1984; 63(12): 1396-13991
3. Carva/ho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress reiief. Oper. Dent. 1996; 21(1): 17-24.
4. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2000; 131: 497-503.
5. Kubo S, Yokota H Sata Y, Hayashi Y. The effect of flexural load cycinng on microleakage of cervical resin composites. Oper. Dent. 2001;17:253-259.
6. Brannstrom M. The cause of post restorative sensitivity and it's prevention. J Endod 1986, 12: 475-481.
7. Guttz J, Do L, Boy/an R, Kaim J, Scherer W. Antimicrobial activity of cavtty disinfectants. Gen Dent. 1999 Mar-Apr;47(2):187-90.
8. Meiers JC, Kresin JC. Cavity disinfectants and dentnn bonding. Oper. Dent. 1996; 21:153-159.
9. Tulunoğlu Ö, Ayhan H, Ölmez A, Bodur H. The effect of cavtty disinfectants on microleakage in dentin bonding systems. J Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 1998, 22(4): 299-305.
10. Türkün M, Türkün LŞ, Kalender A. Effect of cavtty disinfectants on the sealing ability of nonrinsing dentin-bonding resins. Quintessence Int. 2004,35:469-476.
11. Miler MB. Cavtty cleaners/disinfectants. Reality 1995; 9:37.
12. Perdggao J, Denehy GE, Swfft EJ Jr. Effects of chlorhexidine on dentin surfaces and shear bond strengths. Am J Dent. 1994Apr;7(2):81-4.
13. Filer SJ, Lazarchkk DA, Givan DA, Retief DH, Heaven TJ. Shear bond strengths of composite to chlorhexidine-treated ename/.Am J Dent. 1994 Apr;7(2):85-8.
14. Piva E, Martos J, Demarco FF. Microleakage nn amaggam restorations: influence of cavtty cleanser solutions and anticariogenic agents. Oper Dent. 2001 Ju/-Aug;26(4):383-8.
15. Emlson CG. Potential efficacy of chlorhexidine against mutans streptococci and human dental caries. J Dent Res. 1994; 73:682-691.
16. Scheie A.Aa. The role of antimicrobials. "Dental caries-The Disease and its Clinical Management" (Ed. O. Fejerskov ve E.A.M. Kdd), I. Bask, B/ackwel Munksgaard, Denmark, 2003:179-188.
17. Meiers JC, Schachtele CF. The effect of an antibacterial solution on the microflora of human incipient fissure caries. J Dent Res 1984;63:47-51.
18. Fure S, Emlson CG. Effect of chlorhexidine gel treatment supplemented with ch/orhexidine varnish and resin on mutans streptococci and actinomyces on root surfaces. Caries Res 1990;24:242-247.
19. Schaeken MJM, Keltjens HMAM, Van Der Hoeven JS. Effects of fluoride and chlorhexidine on the microflora of dental root surfaces and progression of root-surface caries. J Dent Res 1991;70:150¬153.
20. Nor JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison RB. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface nn primary and permenant teeth. Pediatr Dent 1997;19:246¬252.
21. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent 1994;73:1690-1702.
22. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentnn by a phenyl-p self-etching primer J Dent Res 1994;73(6):1212-1220.
23. Gordon VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS & Denehy GE Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers Am J Dent 1997;10(5): 219-223.
24. Swfft EJ Jr, Perdggao J, Heymann HO Enamel bond strengths of "one-bottle" adhesives Pediatr Dent 1998220(4): 259-262.
25. Perdggao J, Swfft EJ Jr. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentnn adhesion. 'Sturdevant's,The art and science of operative dentistry' (Ed. T.M. Robenson, H.O. Heymann, E.J. Swfft), IV. Bask, Mosby Inc., Missouri, 2002;235-268.
11
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt:17, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2007, Sayfa: 7-12
CELİK, ÖZEL, KARABULUT
26. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdggao J, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding to enamel and dentnn. 'Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry' (Ed. J.B. Summttt, J. W. Robbins, T.J. H/tton, R.S. Schwartz, J Dos SantosJr), III. Bask, Quintessence Pubiishing Co. Inc., Ilinois, 2006; 183-260.
27.
Nalçacı A. Self-etch tek şişe bonding sistemlerin sınıf Vkavitelerdeki mikrosızıntıya etkisi. A.ÜÜ. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32(2):85-90.
28. Abo T, Uno S, Sano H. Comparison of bonding efficacy of an al-nn-one adhesive with a self-etching primer system. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:286-292.
29. Sensi LG, Lopes GC, Monteiro S Jr, Baratieri LN, Verra LC. Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives. Oper Dent2005;30:63-68.
30. Pashley DH, Carva/ho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997;25:355-372.
31. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Miffa E. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents. Am J Dent2004;17:257-261.
32. Hannnng M, Rennhardt KJ, Bott B. Seff-etchnng primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999;24:172-180.
33. Fitchie JG, Puckett AD, Reeves GW, Hembree JH. Microleakage of a new dental adhesive comparing microfilled and hybrid resin composites. Quintessence Int 1996;27:619-625.
34.
Çetik Ç, Yazıcı AR, Dayangaç B, Özgünattay G. Farklı iki ışık kaynağının akışkan restoratif materyallerin kenar sızıntıları üzerine etkisi H.ÜÜ. Dış Hek. Fak. Derg. 2007;31(2):64-70.
35. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int. 1996;27(9):619-625.
36. Yazıcı AR, Çelik Ç, Özgünattay G. Microleakage of different resin composite types. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:790-794.
37. Attar N, Korkmaz Y. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing tight on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007; 8(2):80-8.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com