Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Recovering the Power Inside: A Qualitative Study of Critical Reading in an Iranian University

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
A fundamental goal of critical literacy approaches is to bring a change and empower students as critical agents and subjects of decision making. Students are expected to do more than simply accumulate information; they are encouraged to challenge their „taken for granted' belief structures and transform themselves as well as their immediate social environment. In this article, we present a qualitative enquiry in a university reading course based on critical literacy. We explored how learners reflected on their individual/community and word/world concerns through critical understanding of texts and how they challenged and shattered their „taken for granted' beliefs and started to transform into critical agents of voice and position. The data consists of 400 concept maps, called webs, and personal journals by fifty undergraduate English literature students at an Iranian University, as well as oral and written interviews. The data was qualitatively analyzed in search of themes that could illustrate students' early thinking structures and their empowerment and transformations into subjects of decisions. The study revealed that, through webbing words/worlds and critically challenging texts, students took the opportunity to approach the knowledge and information presented to them analytically and critically. On this basis, we discuss how students were able to gain the power of critiquing, freeing their thoughts, finding and expressing their voice and position, discovering personal meanings in texts and contexts, cooperating and participating, and understanding learning for meaning through the critical act of reading.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-recovering-power-inside-qualitative-study-critical-reading-iranian-university.pdf
  • 3
26
39
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Cervetti, G., Pardales, M. J., & Damico, J. S. (2001). A tale of differences: comparing the traditions,
perspectives, and educational goals of critical reading and critical literacy. Reading Online, 4(9).
Retrieved on September, 25, 2001, from: www.readingonline.org /articles/art_index.asp?
href=/articles.cervetti/index. html Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). London:
Routledge.
Fasheh, M. (2000). The trouble with knowledge. Presented at Global Dialogue on Building Learning Societies: Knowledge, Information, and Human Development, Hanover, Germany.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Freire, P. (1991). The importance of the act of reading. In C. Mitchell and K. Weiler (Eds.). Rewrtting literacy, culture and the discourse of the other (pp.139-146). New York: Bergin & Garvey
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the wordd: London: Routledge & Kegan Press.
Ghahremani-Ghajar, S., & Mirhosseini, S. A. (2005). English class or speaking about everything class?
Dialogue journal writing as a critical EFL literacy practice in an Iranian high school. Language,
Culture and Curriculum, 18(3): 186-199. Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South
Hadley, Bergin & Gravey.
Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings: Cuttural workers and the poiitccs of education. New York: Routledge.
Giroux, H. A.,& McLaren, P. (1989). Schooling, cultural politics, and the struggle for democracy. In H. A. Giroux and P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle (pp. xi-xxv).
Albany, SUNY Press.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, lffe, and work in communities and classrooms. New
York: Cambridge University Press. Kafshgarsouteh, M. (2006). A naturaiistic study of crttical understanding: Forms of language
ownership in webbnng words/worlds. Unpublished MA dissertation, Alzahra University, Tehran,
Iran.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Crttical pedagogy primer. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press. Leistyna, P., & Woodrum, A. (1996). Breaking free. President and Fellows of Harvard College Macedo, D. (1991). The politics of emancipatory literacy in Cape Verde. In C. Mitchell and K. Weiler
(Eds.), Rewrtting literacy: Cutture and the discourse of other (pp. 147-159). New York: Bergin
& Garvey.
Masny, D., & Ghahremani-Ghajar, S. (1999). Weaving multiple literacies: Somali children and their teachers in the context of school culture. Language, Culture and Currccuuum, 12(1): 72-93.
McLaren, P. (1988). Culture or cannon? Critical pedagogy and the politics of literacy. Review of P. Freire and D. Macedo, Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Harvard Educational Review,
58(2): 213-234.
McLaren, P., & da Silva, T. T. (1993). Decentering pedagogy: Critical literacy, resistance, and the politics of memory. . In P. McLaren and P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter (pp. 47-89). London: Routledge.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, July 2011, 2(3)
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Siegel, H., & Fernandez, S. L. (2000). Critical approaches. In M. L. Kamil, R. Barr, P. D. Pearson, and
P. Mothental (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vouume III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Street, B. (1984). Ltteracy in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. Walmsly, S. (1981). On the purpose and content of secondary reading programs. Curriculum Inquiry,
11.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com