You are here

Research on choices of methods of internet of things pricing based on variation of perceived value of service

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.619
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: With the rapid progress of Internet of Things technology, the information service of IoT has got unprecedented development, and plays an increasingly important role in real life. For the increasing demand of information service, the pricing of information service becomes more important. This paper aims to analyze the strategic options and payoff function between information provider and intermediaries based on Stackelberg game. Firstly, we describe information service delivery method based on the Internet of Things specific function. Secondly, we calculate the consumer demand for the information service. Finally, we explain two kinds of strategic options by the game theory, and then discuss the optimal pricing method of information services based on profit maximization. Design/methodology/approach: To achieve this objective, Considering the consumer perceived value of Internet of Things Service changing, we establish a Stackelberg model in which the supplier is the leader followed by the middleman. Then, we compare the advantages of using individual pricing with that of bundling pricing. Findings: The results show that whether information providers adopt bundling pricing strategy or individual pricing strategy depends on the cost of perception equipment, if informationproviders want to adopt individual pricing strategy, the variation of consumers’ perception value of information services must meet certain conditions. Research limitations/implications: the providers make price for the information service, in addition to continuously improve the quality of information service, it also devotes resources to tapping and understanding market information, such as the sensor device price, the variation of perception value of information services and so on, so as to create competitive advantage. This paper is just a preliminary model, it does not take into account the effect of mixed bundling. Originality/value: In this research, a new model for price information service with the game theory is proposed. To the authors' knowledge, it is the first time to study the pricing of information service with the game theory, It discuss the impact of consumers’ perceived value for the equipment of internet of things on pricing strategy, and it also analyze the impaction of consumers’ perceived value for information service on pricing strategy, the research shows that the information providers should take different strategies based on the specific situations to maximize the profit on the information service market of the IOT.
175-187

REFERENCES

References: 

Chen, Z., & Han, Z. (2010). Research information aggregation service mode and operator position in the Internet of Things. Mobile communication, 19:48-51.
Christian, D., & Martin, B. (2009). Cost-Benefit Model for Smart Items in The Supply Chain. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 213-231.
Elgar, F. (2010). What is the Internet of Things . Business Processes & Applications, 2, 1-27.Eva, B., & Dieter, U. (2010). Business Models for the Internet of Things. Architecting the Internet of Things. UK, University of Cambridge Press, 252-279.
Future Internet Assembly. Bled Declaration on Future Internet. April 2008, www.future-internet.eu/index.php?id=47.
Gao, X.R., & Liang, L. (2012). The Analysis of Influencing Factors of the Potential Demand for the Internet of Things Service Market-Based on an Investigation of Smart Home. East China Economic Management, 26(1), 33-38.
Gerd, K., Kawsar, F., Fitton, D. & Vasughi, S. (2010). Smart Objects as Building Blocks for the Internet of Things. Internet Computing, 30-37.
Jens, B., & Christoph, S. (2009). Initial Observations on Economics, Pricing, and Penetration of the Internet of Things Market [J]. Computer Communication Review, 39(2), 50-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1517480.1517491
Michael, C., & Markus, L. (2010). The Internet of Things [J] . McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 1-9.
Sun, J., & Aersriten (2010). Design and Implementation of an Enterprise Internet of Things. ASEA 2010, CCIS 117(2), 254-263.
Theodore & Trakadas (2009). Securing wireless sensor networks towards a trusted "Internet of Things". Towards the Future Internet, 4:47-56.
Venkatesh, R., & Wagner, K. (2003). Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: Contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products[J]. Journal of Business, 76(4), 211-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/367748
Wang, T. & Yan, L. (2010). Application of the Internet of Things: demand oriented [J]. China Telecommunication Industry, 7(115), 44-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1005-8885(09)60506-9
Zhang, Y. & Tang, X. (2008). Study of online information goods bundle pricing [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 28(3), 331-337.
Zhang, Y. (2010). Discussion on the Business Model of Internet of Things [J] . Telecommunication science, 4, 6-11.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com