You are here

Pricing decision research for TPL considering different logistics service level influencing the market demand

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.662
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: With the rapid development of economy and the support of government policy, the development of the logistics industry has become a new economic growth engine. As we all know, the reasonable price of logistics service is the most critical factor for logistics enterprises to win market share and make profit. At the same time, the service level is one of the most important factors which will influence the size of the market share. Therefore, this paper constructs a pricing model considering a situation that the logistics service level affects the market demand. This model helps the enterprises to make scientific decisions. Methodology: To achieve this objective, this paper constructs the TPL service and the pricing decision models based on the game theory. Findings: The conclusion shows that under the situation of independent decision-making, the enterprise which has strong ability of logistics service does not necessarily have a competitive advantage, while pricing equilibrium under the situation of joint decision-making, not only make both sides get more income, but also be conducive to improve the level of service. Research limitations: In this research, there are some assumptions that might affect the accuracy the model such as there are only two TPL enterprises to participate in, and considerations are taken under the condition of complete information environment. These assumptions can be relaxed in the future work.Originality: In this research, logistics service level is taken account into the areas of logistics service pricing, which makes the models more practical and more perfect. And this paper constructs game models based on game theory to make up the limitations of traditional pricing theories in logistics service pricing.
267-275

REFERENCES

References: 

Albert, Y., & Ha, L.L. (2004). Price and Delivery Logistics Competition in a Supply Chain. Review of Network Economics, 1355-1359.
Alberto, D.M., & Giulio, M. (2011). Relationship between logistic service and maintenance costs of warehouses. Facilities, 411-421.Berglund, L.M. (1998). Third Party Logistics Providers-Towards a Conceptual Strategic Model. Linkoping Studies in Management and Economics, 456-467.
Boyer, K.K., & Hult, G.T.M. (2005). Extending the supply chain: Integrating operations and marketing in the online grocery industry. Journal of Operations Management, 42, 661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.01.003
Boyson, C.D.R. (1999). Managing Effective Third party Logistics Relationships:What Does It Take. Journal of Business Logistics, 73-100.
Lambert, D.M., Emmerlhainz, M.A., & Gardner, J.T. (1999). Building successful logistics partnerships. Journal of Business Logistics, 165-181.
Qi, E.S., Jiang, H., & Huo, Y.F. (2010). Pricing analysis of logistics service between TPL and port enterprises. Journal of Tianjin university, 385-389.
Weijers, S., Glöckner, H., & Pieters, R.(2012). Logistic service providers and sustainable physical distribution. Log Forum, 157-165.
Wu, Q., & Dan, B. (2008). TPL coordination contract based on logistics service level influencing the market demand. Journal of management sciences in China, 64-74.
Xie, T.S., & Li, J. (2008). Pricing game analysis for third-party logistics services. Journal of systems engineering, 751-757.
Xu, M.H., Yu, G., & Zhang, H.Q. (2006). Game analysis on supply chain with providing service. Journal of management sciences in China, 18-26.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com