You are here

Competencies and skills for future Industrial Engineers defined in Spanish degrees

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
doi:10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n1.p13-30
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: This paper has a double purpose. First, to analyze the competencies and skills proposed as ideals for an Industrial Engineering degree and identify them in the current study plans implemented in Spanish universities. Second, to check the fit between competencies and skills described in Spanish Industrial Engineering degrees and a real business environment. Design/methodology/approach: We searched information from universities through the web www.universia.es and obtained the list of all Spanish Universities, which have been filtered one by one according to their studies about Industrial Engineering degree. In addition, to compare competencies with real business world we have used results provided from the web analysis and from a previous paper in which a qualitative methodology called grounded theory was used. Findings: On one hand, we have analyzed and identified the competencies and skills proposed as ideals for an Industrial Engineering degree in the current study plans implemented in Spanish universities: competencies as multidisciplinariety and R&D are considered in all the universities, but commercial or environment are not so popular. On the other hand we have checked the fit between competencies and skills described in Spanish Industrial Engineering degrees and a real business environment. As a result, competencies as rotation, experience, company vision and corporative strategy are in all the analyzed study plans, but competencies as shared vision, free access to information and involvement of managers do not appear in new degrees, but they are required in real business. Research limitations/implications: About the origin of information, we use official web sites belonging to Spanish public and some private universities, and corresponding schools. Some universities have not updated the information about degrees in Industrial Engineering, and they still have old plans information. Moreover, the comparison we can make between the competencies of degrees and the needs to develop the Industrial Engineering profession is theoretical because the introduction of new degrees has just started and there are no graduates. Practical implications: The principal practical implication is to identify a professional profile of the engineer common to most Spanish universities and therefore facilitate the selection of one curricula or another for students. These can lead to check with the first graduates whether or not the competencies acquired in University fit in the business world. On the other hand, from a professional point of view, we open a future line of research by testing competencies acquired by graduates and competencies required in the professional field, as well as the study of these competencies in the professional field. In addition, current employees may decide to recycle their competencies or acquire new ones knowing the design of new degrees. Originality/value: There are no comparative studies about competencies a Spanish Industrial Engineer has to acquire in University to develop his or her professional work. In consequence, there are not comparative studies about competencies acquired in University and profiles demanded by companies in real business world. This paper deals with both topics.
13-30

REFERENCES

References: 

ANECA (2005). Libro blanco de titulaciones de grado de ingeniería.
Bunk, G. P. (1994). Teaching competence in initial and continuing vocational training in the Federal Republic of Germany. Vocational Training European Journal, 1, 8-14.
Canós, L., & Santandreu, C. (2010). An integrated model of organizational structure and ideas. INBAM Conference, Valencia.
Centeno, R., & Serafin, M. (2006). Modelo de competencias para el diseño de programas de formación de gerentes de proyectos. Fourth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI’2006). Breaking Frontiers and Barriers in Engineering: Education, Research and Practice.
Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., & Voss, C. A. (1996). Development of a Technical Innovation Audit. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 105-135. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1320105
Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2003). An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge Management Styles and Their Effect on Corporate Performance. Information & Management, 40, 403-417. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00060-5
Marín-García, J. A., García-Sabater, J. P., Miralles, C., & Rodríguez Villalobos, A. (2008). Profile and competence of Spanish industrial engineers in the EUROPEAN Higher Education Area (EHEA). Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 01(02), 269-284.
Marin-Garcia, J. A., García-Sabater, J. P., Perello-Marin, M. R., & Canós-Darós, L. (2009). Proposal of skills for the bachelor degree of Industrial Engineering in the context of the new curriculum. Intangible Capital, 5(4), 387-406.
Marin-Garcia, J. A., García-Sabater, J. P., & Canós-Darós, L. (2010). Industrial Engineering and the design of new European degrees. Dirección y Organización, 40, 35-43.
Marzo Navarro, M., Pedraja Iglesias, M., & Rivera Torres, P. (2006). Las competencias profesionales demandadas por las empresas: el caso de los ingenieros. Revista de Educació, 341, 643-661.
Mesa, J. M., Álvarez, J. V., Villanueva, J. M., & de Cos, F. (2008). Actualización de métodos de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje en Asignaturas de Dirección de Proyectos de Ingeniería. Formación Universitaria, 1(4), 23-28.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Nagata, A (2000). A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1), 1-20. doi:10.1093/icc/9.1.1
Oliveros Martín-Varés, L. (2006). Identificación de competencias: una estrategia para la formación en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Revista Complutense de Educación, 17(1), 101-118.
Ortt, J. R., & Smits, R. (2006). Innovation management: different approaches to cope with the same trends. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(3/4), 296-318. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2006.009461
Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). La Gestión del Intelecto Profesional: Sacar el Máximo de los Mejores. Harvard Deusto Business Review, 75, Noviembre-Diciembre, 4-17.
Rodríguez, L. M. (2005). Herramientas para Medición de las Competencias Genéricas de los Futuros Ingenieros respecto de las Relaciones Interpersonales. Revista de Informática Educativa y Medios Audiovisuales, 2(26), 7-16.
Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. New York: Free Press.
Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22, 221-239. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00812.x
Sastre, M A., & Aguilar, E. M. (2003). Dirección de recursos humanos. Un enfoque estratégico. Madrid: McGraw Hill.
Souitaris, V. (2002). Technological Trajectories as Moderators of Firm-level Determinants of Innovation. Research Policy, 3(6), 877-898. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00154-8
Yániz, C., & Villardón, L. (2006). Planificar desde competencias para promover el aprendizaje. Bilbao: Mensajero.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com