You are here

INVESTIGATION INTO ATTITUDES OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS TOWARDS E-LEARNING WITH RESPECT TO THEIR INDIVIDUAL INNOVATIVENESS LEVELS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Owing to advancements in both information and communication technologies and especially in the internet infrastructure, globalization has shifted to the next dimension; and these developments in technology has expressed its significance in online education like other domains of life. Utilization from new technologies has significantly minimized limitation brought by space and time in online learning progressively. Now, individuals are able to take classes from any institutions across the word. Accordingly, this situation has motivated majority of education institutions around the world to look for ways to maintain their courses or various education programs in e‐learning environment more effectively. Along this process, studies on significant factors on application of technology have intensified. One of these key factors is considered as personal characteristic. When it comes to utilization of technology, individual innovativeness concept gains prominence based on personal behaviors relevant with innovativeness. Attitudes of pre‐service teacher towards e‐learning are influent on numbers of variable relevant with e‐course. Thus, the purpose of the present study is to reveal the changes in attitudes of pre‐service teachers who take online classes towards online learning with respect to their individual innovativeness levels. Study data was collected from students who take online classes through distance education system in a bachelor degree program at faculty of education at a public university. On the basis of collected data, it was revealed that pre‐service teachers’ attitude towards e‐learning differs significantly according to respondents’ levels of individual innovativeness.
31
38

REFERENCES

References: 

Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the
domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204‐215.
Baran, B., Kilic, E., Bakar Corez, A., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Turkish university students' technology use profiles and
their thoughts about distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(1), 235‐
242.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND INSTRUCTIONAL STUDIES
IN THE WORLD
May 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 2 Article: 04 ISSN: 2146-7463
COPYRIGHT © JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND INSTRUCTIONAL STUDIES IN THE WORLD
38
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E‐Learning: Promise and pitfalls. e-Learning and the Science of Instruction:
Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, Third Edition, 6‐26.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating, Quantitative. (Fourth
Edition). Boston: Pearson Education.
Gülnar, B. (2008). Bilgisayar ve internet destekli distance education programlarının tasarım, geliştirme ve
değerlendirme aşamaları (SUZEP örneği). Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 19. 259‐271.
Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value‐attitude‐behavior hierarchy. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638.
Köroğlu, A. Y. (2014). Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin ve Pre‐service teachernın Bilişim Technologies Özyeterlik
Algıları, Technological Araç‐Gereç Kullanım Tutumları ve İndividual İnnovativeness Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi.
(Unpublished master thesis), Gazi University, Education Science Institue, Ankara.
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e‐learning.
Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066‐1080.Robbins, S. P. (1994). Örgütsel davranışın temelleri (çev. S. A.
Öztürk). Eskişehir: Anadolu University Yayınları.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065‐1078.
Rosen, A. P. (2004). The effect of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology (PIIT) on the
acceptance and use of technology: A working paper. Paper presented at the meeting of the 35th Decision
Sciences Institute, Boston.
Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: Wiley.
Van Braak, J. (2001). Individual characteristics influencing teachers' class use of computers. Journal of
Educational Computing Research, 25(2), 141‐157.
Yilmaz, O., & Bayraktar, D. M. (2014). Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of educational technologies and their
individual innovativeness categories. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116. 3458‐3461.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com