You are here

Home » Content

English teachers’ research engagement: Level of engagement and motivation

Journal Name:

  • Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The gap between research and practice has been an endemic feature of the Iranian English language teaching profession. This concern has recently received major attention by the call for empirical investigations to be conducted in order to improve the relationship between research and practice. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the extent to which Iranian English teachers engage in doing and reading research. The study also aimed at exploring the motivations that can promote teachers’ research engagement. Data were collected through conducting qualitative interviews with 24 teachers with various teaching backgrounds. Analysis of the data revealed moderate level of research engagement. The results also showed a wide range of motivations, including teachers’ professional development, instrumental incentives, institutional expectations and pedagogical concerns that can promote teachers’ research engagement. Further analyses demonstrated that teachers’ professional development and pedagogical concerns remain their main motivations for research engagement. Instrumental incentives and organizational expectations comprise other potential motivations that can be profitably used to encourage teachers’ research engagement. However, this is not likely to happen unless working conditions in Iranian schools and policy conditions in national education system are altered.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-english-teachers-research-engagement-level-engagement-and-motivation.pdf
  • 1
83
97
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62 (2), 139-147.
Berg, B.L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (3), 295-301.
Block, D. (2000). Revisiting the gap between SLA researchers and language teachers. Links & Letters, 7, 129-143.
Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731-747.
Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers' conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30 (3), 358-388.
Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43 (4), 391-429.
Borg, S., & Liu, Y. (2013). Chinese college English teachers’ research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47 (2), 270- 299.
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32 (9), 3-14.
Campbell, A., & Jacques, K. (2004). Best practiced researched: Teachers’ expectations of the impact of doing research in their classrooms and schools. Teacher Development, 17 (1), 75-90.
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15 (5), 555-568.
96 M. Mehrani/English teachers’ research …
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28 (7), 15-25.
Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics 14 (2), 130-144.
Donato, R. (2003). Action research. Center for applied linguistics online resources. Retrieved November 9, 2012, from www.cal.org/resources/digest/digest_pdfs/0308donato.pdf
Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2000). Teachers’ perspectives on educational research: Knowledge and context. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26 (2), 167-182.
Gao, X., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. (2010). 'Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient': Understanding primary school English teachers’ conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research, 15 (1), 61-81.
Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. (2004). [RE]Visioning the academic-teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching, 10 (1), 35-58.
Gurney, M. (1989). Implementer or innovator: A teacher’s challenge to the restrictive paradigm of traditional research. In P. Lomax, (Ed.), The Management of Change (pp. 13-28). New York: Multilingual Matters.
Hemsley-Brown, J. (2005). Using research to support management decision making within the field of education. Management Decision, 43, 691-705.
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education 29, 449-470.
Lankshear, C., & M. Knobel (2004). A handbook for teacher research: From design to implementation. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Macaro, E. (2003). Teaching and learning a second language: A guide to recent research and its applications. London: Continuum.
Mehrani, M. B. (In press). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Voice of mediators. TELL.
Mehrani, M. B., & Khodi, A. (2014). An appraisal of the Iranian academic research on English language teaching. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6 (3) 89-97.
Mehrani, M. B., Samar, R. G., & Behzadnia, A. (2012, May). Research on language teaching and learning in Iran: 2005 to 2010. Paper presented at The1st National Conference on ELT in Iran, Islamic Azad University, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3(1), (Jan., 2015) 83-97 97
Mirhosseini, A. (2013). Ideologies of English Language Teaching Research in Iran: An ethnomethodological and autoethnographic inquiry. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Nassaji, H. (2012). The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives, Language Teaching Research, 13 (2), 337-365.
Roberts, J. R. (1993). Evaluating the impacts of teacher research. System 21 (1), 1-19.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Samar, R. G., Mehrani, M. B., & Kiyani G. (2012). An investigation into the generalizability of quantitative research studies in Iranian ELT contecxt. Comparative Language & Literature Research, 3 (4), 193-213.
Samar, R. G., & Mehrani, M. B. (2012, October). Does the supply meet the demands? The mismatch between researchers’ interests and practitioners’ needs. Paper presented at The 10th International TELLSI Conference, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Watkins, A. (2006). So what exactly do teacher-researchers think about doing research? Support for Learning, 21 (1), 12-18.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com