You are here

Home » Content

TÜRKİYE’YE GELEN DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLARIN TÜRKİYE’NİN İHRACAT PERFORMANSINA ETKİLERİNİN VAR YÖNTEMİ İLE TAHMİNİ

THE VAR ESTIMATE OF THE EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT INFLOW TO TURKEY ON TURKEY’S EXPORT PERFORMANCE

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this article the relationship between FDI inflow to Turkey and Turkey’s export performance is analyzed. The lack of studies in Turkey about this issue constitutes the main motivation behind this study. The effect of FDI on exports was analyzed through the Granger Causality Test (GCT) (for the period of 1992:1-2009:7) and the VAR Analyses. As a result of the GCT, a unidirectional causality from FDI to exports was found. According to the results of export variance decomposition, it is observed that exports are under the influence of exports’ own lagged values. FDI plays 6 percent role in export changes. This finding corresponds to the finding that FDI causes exports. 74 percent of FDI changes arises from FDI, 10 percent from Interest Rates, and 8 percent from Exchange Rate. While Openness Ratio’s explanatory level for FDI is 2 percent, other variables are not significant in explaining FDI changes. According to these results, interest rates in the country, exchange rates, and openness ratio are main incentives behind FDI.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Makalede, Türkiye’ye gelen doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ile Türkiye’nin ihracat performansı arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. Bu konuda Türkiye ile ilgili çalışmaların azlığı, bu makalenin temel motivasyonunu oluşturmaktadır. Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların ihracat üzerindeki etkisi (1992:1-2009:7 dönemi için) Granger Nedensellik Analizi ve VAR (vektör otoregresif) Analizi yardımıyla araştırılmaktadır. Nedensellik Analizi sonucunda Türkiye’de, doğrudan yabancı yatırımdan, ihracata doğru tek yönlü bir nedenselliğe rastlanmıştır. İhracatın varyans ayrıştırması sonuçlarında ihracatın çoğunlukla kendi gecikmeli değerlerinin etkisi altında kaldığı görülmektedir. İhracatta meydana gelen değişmelerde doğrudan yabancı yatırım % 6’lık bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu bulgu, doğrudan yabancı yatırımın, ihracatın nedeni olduğu yönündeki bulgu ile de örtüşmektedir. Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım’da meydana gelen değişmenin % 74’ü kendinden, % 10’u Faiz Oranı’ndan, % 8’i Döviz Kuru’ndan kaynaklanmaktadır. Dışa Açıklık Oranı’nın Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım’ı açıklama derecesi % 2 iken, diğer değişkenlerin Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım’da ortaya çıkan değişimleri açıklamada önemsiz kaldıkları görülmektedir. Buna göre, yabancı yatırımcıları motive eden ülkedeki faiz oranı, döviz kuru ve dışa açıklık oranının derecesi olmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turkiyeye-gelen-dogrudan-yabanci-yatirimlarin-turkiyenin-ihracat-performansina-etkilerinin-var-yontemi-ile-tahmini.pdf
  • 3
39-63
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alguacil, T, Cuadros, A. and Orts, V. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment,
Exports and Domestic Performance in Mexico: A Causality Analysis. Economics
Letters, v. 77: 371-376.
Bozkurt, H. (2007). Zaman Serileri Analizi. Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi.
Chou, T.C. (1988). American and Japanese Direct Foreign Investment in
Taiwan: A Comparative Study. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 29 (2): 165-179.
Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for
Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica, 49: 1057-1072.
Enders, W. (1995). Applied Econometric Time Series. Newyork: Iowa
State University, John Wiley&Sons Inc.
Gu, W., Awokuse, T.O. and Yuan, Y. (2008). The Contribution of Foreign
Direct Investment to China’s Export Performance: Evidence from Disaggregated
Sectors. Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics
Association Annual Meeting, July, Orlando, FL.
Gunawardana, P.J. and Sharma, K. (2009). The Impact of Inward FDI,
labour Productivitiy and Industry Assistance on Manufacturing Exports of
Australia. Victoria University, Working Paper Series School of Economics and
Finance, Australia: September, WP2009.
Hood, N. and Young, S. (1979). The Economics of Multinational
Enterprise. June, London: Longman.
Jun, K.W. and Singh, H. (1996). The Determinants Of Foreign Direct
Investment in Developing Countries. Transnational Corporations, 5 (2): 67-105.
Karagöz, M. ve Karagöz, K. (2006). Türk Ekonomisinde İhracat ve
Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım İlişkisi: Bir Zaman Serisi Analizi. Abant İzzet Baysal
Üniversitesi, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3 (1): 117-126.
Katos, A., Lawler, K. and Seddighi, H. (2000). Econometrics: A Practical
Approach. December, London: Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge.
Khan, K. and Leng, K. (1997). Foreign Direct Investment, Exports and
Economic Growth. Singapore Economic Review , 42 (2): 40-60.
Leichenko, R. M. and Erickson, R. A. (1997). Foreign Direct Investment
and State Export Performance. Journal of Regional Science, 37 (2): 307-329.
Lin, A.-L. (1995). Trade Effects of For eign Direct Investment: Evidence
For Taiwan with Four ASEAN Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 131 (4):
737-747.
Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis.
Newyork: Springer-Verlag, Berlin Hiedelberg.
Menon, J. (2000). How open is Malaysia? An Analysis of Trade Capital
and Labour Flows. The World Economy, 23 (2): 235-255.
Özgen, F.B. ve Güloğlu, B. (2004). Türkiye’de İç Borçların İktisadi
Etkilerinin VAR Tekniğiyle Analizi. METU Studies in Development, 31: 93-114.
Pacheco-Lopez, P. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment, Exports and Imports
in Mexico. The World Economy, 28 (8): 1157-1172.
Pesaran H.H., and Shin, Y.,(1998). Generalized Impulse Response
Analysis In Linear Multivariate Models. Economics Letters, 58: 17-29
Seo, J. S. (1997). Dynamics Of Comparative Advantage and Foreign Direct
Investment in Korea And Taiwan: An Analysis Of The Relationship Between FDI
And Trade, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Samsu, S.H., Derus, A.M., Ooi, A-Y and Ghazali, M.F. (2008). Causal
Links Between Foreign Direct Invetsmet and Exports: Evidence from Malaysia.
International Journal of Business and Management. 3 (12): 177-183.
Sims, C.A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, (48): 1-48.
Stock , J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2001). Vector Autoregressions. Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 25 (4): 101-115.
Temiz, D. ve Gökmen, A. (2009). Foreign Direct Investment and Export in
Turkey: The Period of 1991-2008, EconAnadolu 2009: Anadolu Uluslararası İktisat
Kongresi, 17-19 Haziran 2009, Eskişehir, Türkiye (econ.anadolu.edu.tr/fullpapers/
Temiz_Gokmen_econanadolu2009.pdf) (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2009) .
Xuan, N.T. ve Xing, Y. (2006). Foreign Direct Investment and Exports:
the Experiences of Vietnam, GSIR (Graduate School of International Relations)
Working Papers, Economic Development &Policy Series, EDP06-11, Japan.
Vogelvang, B. (2003). Econometrics: Theory and Applicatioans with
Eviews, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Zhang, K.H. and Song, S. (2000). Promoting exports: the role of inward
FDI in China. China Economic Review, 11: 385-396.
Zhang, Q. and Felmingham, B. (2001). The Relationship Between Inward
Direct Foreign Investment and China’s Provincial Export Trade. China Economic
Review, 12: 82-99.
Zhang, K.H. (2005). How Does FDI Affect a Host Country’s Export
Performance? The Case of China, Paper presented to International conference of
WTO, China and the Asian Economies, 25-26 June, 3. Xi’an, China.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com