You are here

Home » Content

TÜRKİYE'DE BÖLGESEL GELİŞMİŞLİK FARKLARI: BİR VERİ ZARFLAMA ANALİZİ (DÜZEY-2 BÖLGELERİ)

REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT DISPARITIES IN TURKEY: A DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (LEVEL-2 REGIONS)

Journal Name:

  • Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Aim of this study is to investigate to what extend the level-2 regions (NUTS-2) could respectively benefit from scale economies and could use their resources efficiently, hence how close they could create value added with respect to their potentials in Turkey by implementing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In this respect, through impacts of along with aggregate employment, employment by main sectors, human capital, public infrastructure investments, entrepreneurship, innovations, technology levels and exports on per capita gross value added, the economic performances of the level-2 regions are evaluated. In general six regions respectively could not benefit from scale economies adequately and could use their considered inputs (particularly innovations) inefficiently. On the other hand, promoting innovations, employment, entrepreneurship, public infrastructure and technology level is an initial issue for the rapid development of six least developed regions that could use their inputs efficiently. On the other hand, innovations and public infrastructure have positive impact only on development of the poorest regions when also the linear regression estimates are considered
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de düzey-2 bölgelerinin ölçeklerini ve kaynaklarını görece ne ölçüde etkin kullanabildiklerini, dolayısıyla potansiyellerinin altında katma değer yaratıp-yaratmadıklarını Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) ile incelemektir. Bu çerçevede, istihdamın yanında, istihdamın sektörel dağılımının, beşeri sermayenin, kamu altyapı yatırımlarının, girişimciliğin, yeniliklerin, teknoloji düzeyinin ve ihracatın kişi başına gayri safi katma değer (KBGSKD) üzerindeki etkisi yoluyla düzey-2 bölgelerinin ekonomik performansı değerlendirilmektedir. Genelde altı bölgenin görece ölçek ekonomilerinden yeterince yararlanamadığı ve sözkonusu girdilerini (özellikle yenilikleri) oldukça etkinsiz kullandığı; diğer taraftan, kaynaklarını etkin kullanabilen altı en geri kalmış bölgenin kalkınmasında yenilik faaliyetlerinin, istihdamın, girişimciliğin, kamu altyapı yatırımlarının ve teknoloji düzeyinin önemli olduğu gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca, doğrusal regresyon tahminlerini de dikkate aldığımızda yenilik faaliyetlerinin ve kamu altyapı yatırımlarının sadece geri kalmış bölgeleri olumlu yönde etkiledikleri anlaşılmaktadır
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turkiyede-bolgesel-gelismislik-farklari-bir-veri-zarflama-analizi-duzey-2-bolgeleri.pdf
  • 2
77-97
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ASCHAUER, D., A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive?. Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177-200.
ASCHAUER, D., A. (1990). Why is infrastructure important?, in: Munnell, A. (Ed), Is there a shortfall in public investment?. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 21-50.
AYDEMİR, Z. C. (2002). Bölgesel rekabet edebilirlik kapsamında illerin kaynak kullanım görece verimlilikleri: Veri zarflama analizi uygulaması, Ankara: DPT Uzmanlık Tezleri, Yayın No:2664.
BERBER, M., & YAMAK, R., & ARTAN, S., (2000). "Türkiye'de yakınlaşma hipotezinin bölgeler bazında geçerliliği üzerine ampirik bir
94
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt:10, Sayı:2, Ekim 2012
çalışma:1975-1997", 9. Ulusal Bölge Bilimi ve Bölge Planlama Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 51-59.
BOR, Y. J., & CHUANG, Y. C., & LAİ, W. W., & YANG, C. Min., (2010). A dynamic general equilibrium model for public R&D investment in Taiwan. EconomicModelling, 27 (1), 171-183.
BOSMA, N., & LEVİE, J., (2009). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2009. Executive Report.
BRAUNERHJELM, P., & ACS, Z., & AUDRETSCH, D., B., & CARLSSON, B., (2010). The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34 (2),
105-125.
CHARNES, A., & COOPER W. W., & SHANLING, L., (1989). Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of chinese cities. Socio-Econ. Planning Science, 23 (6), 325-344.
DESTEFANİS, S., & SENA, V., (2005). Public capital and total factor productivity: new evidence from the Italian regions (1970-1998). Regional
Studies, 39, 603-617.
FİLİZTEKİN, A. (1998). Convergence across industries and provinces in Turkey. Koç University Working Paper, No.1998/08.
GARCİA-MİLÂ, T., & MCGUİRE, J., T., & PORTER, R., H., (1996). The effect of public capital in state-level production functions reconsidered. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 177-180.
GOLANY, B., & THORE, S., (1997). The economic and social performance of nations: efficieny and returns to scale. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 31 (3), 191-204.
GROSSMAN, G., M., & HELPMAN, E., (1992). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
HALKOS, G., & TZEMERES, N, (2005). A DEA approach to regional
development. Munich Personal RePEc Archive MPRA Paper No.3992, 2005.
HOLTZ-EAKİN, D., (1994). Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 12-21.
HOLTZ-EAKİN, D., & KAO, C., (2003). Entrepreneruship and
economic growth: the proof is in the productivity. Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University Mineo.
JARREAY, J., & PONCET, S., (2011). Export sophistication and economic growth: evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 13 April 2011.
KARACA, O., (2004). Türkiye'de bölgelerarası gelir farklılıkları: yakınsama var mı?. Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu, Tartışma Metni 2004/7, Ankara.
KARKAZİS, J., & THANASSOULİS, E., (1998). Assessing the effectiveness of regional development policies in northern greece using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 32 (2), 1998, 123¬137.
95
Celal Bayar Üniversitesi
KIRAN, B., (2008). Kalkınmada öncelikli illerin ekonomik etkinliklerinin veri zarflama yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adana.
KOO, J., & KİM, T., (2009). When R&D matters for regional growth: a tripod approach. Papers in Regional Science, 88(4), 825-840.
LAABAS, B., & RAZZAK, W., (2011). Economic growth and the quality of human capital. Unpublished, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28727/, [İndirme Tarihi: 13.02.2011].
LUCAS, R., E., (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 22, 3-32.
MUNNELL, A., H., (1990). How does public ınvestment affect regional economic performance?. In: Munnell, A. (Ed.), Is There a Shortfall in Public Investment, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston MA, 69-103.
MUNNELL, A., H., (1992). Policy watch infrastructure investment and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (4), 189-198.
OSORİO, B., B., & POSE, A. R., (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35 (4), 434-455.
PORTER, M., E., (1991). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The MacMillan Press. Ltd.
ROMER, P., M., (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.
SOUKİAZİS, E., & ANTUNES, M., (2011). Is foreign trade important for regional growth? empirical evidence from portugal. Economic Modelling, 28
(3), 1363-1373.
SUTTER, R., C., (2011). The psychology of entrepreneurship and the technological frontier - a spatial econometric analysis of regional entrepreneurship in the United States. George Mason University, USA, Dissertation, http://u2.gmu.edu:8080/handle/1920/5807, [İndirme Tarihi:
15.01.2011].
WOO, Y., J., & KİM, E., & LİM, J., (2011). The effects of education
and R&D investments on regional growth.
www.prsco2011.com/download.asp?filename=WKL_PRSCO.pdf, [İndirme Tarihi: 15.03.2011].
YOUNG, A. (1995). The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the east asian growth experience. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 641-680.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com