You are here

Home » Content

Konjenital Nonsendromik Dentofasiyal Deformitelerde Distraksiyon Osteogenezi

Distraction Osteogenesis in Congenital Nonsyndromic Dentofacial Deformities

Journal Name:

  • Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016
DOI: 
10.17954/amj.2016.55

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Congenital deformities in the face occur due to accompanying congenital facial deformity or developmental problems secondary to deformities. Scar formation after surgery or soft tissue deficiencies around the deformity may enhance the developmental problems. The most common congenital facial deformities requiring skeletal correction are deformities secondary to cleft lip and palate, Pierre-Robin Sequence, and craniofacial microsomia. All these deformities can be treated with bony advancement with classical orthognathic surgery or distraction osteogenesis and soft tissue augmentation procedures. The treatment planning for these deformities is complex and difficult, because the required amount of bony advancement is generally quite large and there is inadequate soft tissue coverage of the area. Orthognathic surgery is more difficult to perform in cleft lip and palate cases and impossible for the micrognathic newborn. Due to longer and more stable advancement opportunities, distraction osteogenesis has become more popular in bony restoration of congenital facial deformities.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Konjenital fasiyal deformiteler gerek mevcut deformite, gerekse deformitenin gelişim sürecindeki yansıması olarak görülebilmektedir. Gelişimsel sorunlar sıklıkla mandibula veya orta yüz bölgesinde maksilla gelişiminde beliren yetersizlik ve buna bağlı olarak çevre dokularda oluşan orantı problemleri ile kendisini göstermektedir. Gelişim geriliğinin en önemli nedenleri arasında yapılan onarım sonrası ortaya çıkan skarın kemik gelişimini engellemesi , kemiğin gelişim odağının deforme olması ve çevre yumuşak doku eksiklikleri sayılabilmektedir. Kemik augmentasyonunu gerektiren fasiyal konjenital deformiteler arasında; Pierre-Robin sekansı, dudak damak yarıklarına sekonder orta yüz gerilikleri, kraniofasiyal mikrozomi sayılabilir. Sözü edilen deformite spektrumu, klasik ortognatik cerrahi veya distraksiyon osteogenezi ile kemik yapının restorasyonu ve bunlara ek olarak yumuşak doku augmentasyonları ile rekonstrükte edilebilmektedir. Kemik doku restorasyonunda ilerletme olanaklarının daha fazla olması,yeni kemik elde edilebilmesi, serbest doku nakli gereksinimini azaltması ve daha stabil bir onarım imkanı sağlaması nedenleri ile distraksiyon osteogenezi son yılarda daha etkin bir tedavi yöntemi olarak görülmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-konjenital-nonsendromik-dentofasiyal-deformitelerde-distraksiyon-osteogenezi.pdf
  • 3
119
126
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Li Y, Shi B, Song Q-G, Zuo H, Zheng Q. Effect of lip repair
on maxillary growth and facial soft tissue development in
patients with a complete unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus
and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34:355–61.
2. Mars M, Houston WJ. A preliminary study of facial
growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral
cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age. Cleft
Palate J 1990; 27:7–10.
3. Sommerlad BC, Henley M, Birch M, Harland K,
Moiemen N, Boorman JG. Cleft palate re-repair e a
clinical and radiographic study of 32 consecutive cases.
Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47:406-10.
4. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in
unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 4: Repair of the cleft
lip. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24:45-53.
125
Konjenital Nonsendromik Dentofasiyal Deformitelerde Distraksiyon Osteogenezi
Akd Tıp D / Akd Med J / 2016; 3: 119-126
5. Rohrich RJ, Rowsell AR, Johns DF, Drury MA, Grieg
MA, Watson DJ, Godfrey AM, Poole MD. Timing of
hard palatal closure: A critical long-term analysis. Plast
Reconstr Surg 1996; 98:236–42.
6. Ysunza A, Pamplona MC, Quiroz J, Yudovich M, Molina
F, González S, Chavelas K. Maxillary growth in patients
with complete cleft lip and palate, operated on around 4-
6 months of age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolog 2010; 74:482-
5.
7. Kulewicz M, Dudkiewicz Z. Craniofacial morphological
outcome following treatment with three different surgical
protocols for complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: A
preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39:
122-8.
8. Linder-Aronson S, Woodside DG, Hellsing E, Emerson
W. Normalization of incisor position after adenoidectomy.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 5:412-27.
9. Koželj V, Drevenšek M. Correlation between skeletal
development and oral posture in UCLP children. In:
Guiliani R, Galliani E, eds. 7th European Craniofacial
Congress. Medimond: Bologna, 2003:53–6.
10. Cheung LK, Chua HDP. A meta-analysis of cleft
maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35:14–24.
11. Shetye PR. Facial growth of adults with unoperated clefts.
Clin Plast Surg 2004; 31:361-71.
12. Chaisrisookumporn N, Stella JP, Epker BN.
Anthropometric profile evaluation of the midface in
patients with cleft lip and palate. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80:127-36.
13. Li Y, Shi B, Song QG, Zuo H, Zheng Q. Effects of
lip repair on maxillary growth and facial soft tissue
development in patients with a complete unilateral cleft
of lip, alveolus and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;
34:355-61 (Epub 2006 Jul 21).
14. Smahel Z, Polivková H, Skvarilová B, Horák I.
Configuration of facial profile in adults with cleft lip with
or without cleft palate. Acta Chir Plast 1992; 34:190-203.
15. Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Phillips JH. Comparison of the
morphology of the “cleft face” and the normal face:
Defining the anthropometric differences. J Craniofac Surg
2000;11:76-82.
16. Bralley RC, Schoeny ZG. Effects of maxillary advancement
on the speech of a sub-mucous cleft patient. Cleft
Palate J 1977; 14:98–101.
17. Freihofer HPM. Changes in nasal profile after maxillary
advancement in cleft and non-cleft patients. J Maxillofac
Surg 1977; 5:20–7.
18. Witzel MA, Munro IR. Velopharyngeal insufficiency after
maxillary advancement. Cleft Palate J 1977; 14:176–80.
19. Erbe M, Stoelinga PJ, Leenen RJ. Long-term results of
segmental repositioning of the maxilla in cleft palate
patients without previously grafted alveolo-palatal clefts.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996; 24:109.
20. Posnick JC, Dagys AP. Skeletal stability and relapse
patterns after Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy fixed with
miniplates: The unilateral cleft lip and palate deformity.
Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94:924.
21. Heliövaara A, Ranta R, Hukki J, Rintala A. Skeletal
stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with unilateral
cleft lip and palate. Scand J PlastReconstr Surg Hand
Surg 2001; 35:43-9.
22. Heliövaara A, Ranta R, Hukki J, Rintala A. Skeletal
stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with isolated
cleft palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31:358-63.
23. Cheung LK, Chua HD, Hägg MB. Cleft maxillary distraction
versus orthognathic surgery: Clinical morbidities
and surgical relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:996-
1008; discussion 1009.
24. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson
BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual
distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89:1-8.
25. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Rigid external distraction: Its
application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr
Surg 1998; 102:1360–74.
26. Gürsoy S, Hukki J, Hurmerinta K. Five-year follow-up
of maxillary distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial
structures of children with cleft lip and palate. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:744-50 (Epub 2010 Jan 15).
27. Chua HD, Hägg MB, Cheung LK. Cleft maxillary
distraction versus orthognathic surgery-which one is more
stable in 5 years? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Radiol Endod 2010; 109:803-14.
28. Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Friede H, Ko EW. Long-term
skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with
distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction
device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg
2004; 114:1382-92; discussion 1393-4.
29. Aksu M, Saglam-Aydinatay B, Akcan CA, El H, Taner
T, Kocadereli I, Tuncbilek G, Mavili ME. Skeletal and
dental stability after maxillary distraction with a rigid
external device in adult cleft lip and palate patients. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:25.
30. Randall P, Krogman WM, Jahina S. Pierre Robin and
the syndrome that bears his name. Cleft Palate J 1965;
2:237–44.
31. Wagener S, Rayatt SS, Tatman A, Gornall P, Slator R.
Management of infants with Pierre Robin sequence. Cleft
Palate Craniofac J 2003; 40:180–5.
126
Konaş E ve Tunçbilek G.
Akd Tıp D / Akd Med J / 2016; 3: 119-126
32. Monasterio FO, Molina F, Berlanga F, López ME,
Ahumada H, Takenaga RH, Ysunza A. Swallowing
disorders in Pierre Robin sequence: Its correction by
distraction. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:934-41.
33. Genecov DG, Barceló CR, Steinberg D, Trone T, Sperry
E. Clinical experience with the application of distraction
osteogenesis for airway obstruction. J Craniofac Surg
2009; 20 Suppl 2:1817-21.
34. Caoutte-Laberge L, Bayet B, Larocque Y. The Pierre
Robin sequence: Review of 125 cases and evolution of
treatment modalities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93:934-
42.
35. Tomaski S, Zalzal G, Saal H. Airway obstruction in the
Pierre Robin sequence. Laryngoscope 1995; 105:111-4.
36. McCarthy JG, Grayson B, Coccaro PJ, Wood-Smith D.
In: McCarthy JG, ed. Craniofacial microsomia in plastic
surgery. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1990.
37. Gorlin RJ, Pindburg JJ, Cohen MM: Syndromes of the
Head and Neck, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
38. Converse JM, Wood-Smith D, McCarthy JG, Coccaro
PJ, Becker M. Bilateral facial microsomia: Diagnosis,
classification, treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974;
54:413.
39. Murray JE, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Evans CA. Analysis
and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. In: Caronni EP,
ed. Craniofacial surgery. Boston: Little Brown, 1985:377–
90.
40. Grabb WC. The first and second branchial arch syndrome.
Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36:485–508.
41. Poswillo D. Otomandibular deformity: Pathogenesis as a
guide to reconstruction. J Maxillofac Surg 1974; 2:64–72.
42. Grabb WC. The first and second branchial arch syndrome.
Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36:485.
43. Converse JM, Coccaro PJ, Becker H, Wood-Smith D. On
hemifacial microsomia: The first and second branchial
arch syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51:268.
44. Mathes SJ. Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Sounders,
2006.
45. Kaban LB, Moses MH, Mulliken JB. Surgical correction
of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child. Plast
Reconstr Surg 1988; 82:9-19.
46. Mulliken JB, Ferraro NF, Vento AR. A retrospective
analysis of growth of the constructed condyle-ramus in
children with hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate J 1989;
26:312-7.
47. Converse JM, Shapiro HH. Treatment of developmental
malformations of the jaws. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946)
1952; 10:473-510.
48. Converse JM, Shapiro HH. Treatment of developmental
malformations of the jaws. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946)
1952;10:316-53.
49. Stark RB, Saunders DE. The first branchial syndrome.
The oral-mandibular-auricular syndrome. Plast Reconstr
Surg Transplant Bull 1962; 29:229-39.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com