You are here

SINAV HAZIRLIKLARI VE SINAV SÜRECİNDE YAŞANAN BAZI OLUMSUZLUKLARIN ÖĞRENCİ BAŞARISINA ETKİSİ

THE EFFECTS OF SOME NEGATIVITIES ENCOUNTERED DURING AND GETTING READY TO EXAMINATIONS ON THE STUDENT’S SUCCESS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study has been carried out Kâzım Karabekir and Erzincan Educational Faculties of Atatürk University. A questionnaire has been administered to 456 students to appreciate theirs views on the negativities encountered during and getting ready examination to student’s success. The results have been evaluated by using the X2 test and theirs significancy degrees have been given (p<0,05). When reviewed the answers with respect to the sexuality “I don’t success because I believe that unnecessary some courses” , “My success is prevented due to insufficient course material and resources” were significant. The answers about class levels such as “My success is prevented due to disorder in exam programme and exams frequency”, “My success is prevented because I get excited the exam” were found as significant.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Araştırma Atatürk Üniversitesi Kâzım Karabekir Eğitim fakültesi ve Erzincan Eğitim fakültesinde yapılmıştır. Her iki fakültede öğrenim gören 456 öğrenciye anket uygulanarak sınava hazırlanırken ve sınav sırasında yaşanan olumsuzlukların öğrenci başarısına etkisi ile ilgili görüşler alınmıştır. Elde edilen verilere X2 “uyum kontrol testi” uygulanarak önemlilik dereceleri tespit edilmiştir (p<0,05). Neticede, istatistiki olarak (p<0,05’e göre) verilen cevapların cinsiyet ile ilişkisinde “Gerekliliğine inanmadığım derslerden başarısız oluyorum” , “Ders dokümanları ve kaynakların yetersizliği başarımı olumsuz etkiliyor” ifadelerinde; sınıf düzeylerine göre ise, “Sınav programındaki düzensizlikler ve sınavların üst üste gelmesi başarımı düşürüyor” ve “Sınavlarda çok heyecanlanmam, başarımı düşürüyor” ifadelerinde %5 seviyesinde anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur.
55-67

REFERENCES

References: 

Anon. Anadolu Üniversitesi ÖğrencilerininSosyo Kültürel ve Sosyo Ekonomik Özellikleri
ile Beklenti ve Sorunları. T.C.Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
No: 1097. Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayınları. No: 602,Eskişehir, 1999
Aschbacher, P.M., (1994). Helping Educators to Develop and Use Alternative Assessments:
Barriers And Facilitators, Educational Policy, 8 (2), 202-224.
Başar A., Oktay E., (1998). Uygulamalı İstatistik-1,2. Erzurum: Şafak Yayınevi.
Baume, D., Yorke, M., (2002). The reliability of assessment by Portfolio on a
Course to Develop and Accredit Teachers in Higher Education, Studies
in Higher Education, 27 (1), 8-25.
Bell, B., Cowie, B., (2001). The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in Science
Education, Sci.Ed., 85, 536-553.
Biggs, J., (1998). Assessment And Classroom Learning: A Role For Summative
Assessment?, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,
5 (1),103- 111.
Black, P., (1995). Assessment and Feedback in Science Education, Studies in Educational
Evaluation, 21, 257-279.
Butler, A., Phillmann, K.-B., Smart, L., (2001). Active Learning Within A Lecture:
Assessing The Impact Of Short, In-Class Writing Exercises, Methods and
Techniques, 28 (4), 257-259.
Columba, L., (2001). Daily classroom assessment, Education, 122 (2), 372-375.
Dochy, F., Moerkerke, G., (1997). The Present, The Past and The Future of
Achievement Testing and Performance Assessment, International Journal
of Educational Research, 27 (5), 415-432.
Dochy, F., (2001). A New Assessment Era: Different Needs, New Challenges, Research
Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 2, 11-20.
Holliday, W. G.,Yore, L.D., Alvermann, D. E., (1994). The Reading-
Science Learning-Writing Connection: Breakthroughs, Barriers and Promises,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 877-894.
Klecker, B. M., (2000). Assessing Students in A Graduate Tests and Measurement
Course: Changing The Classroom Climate, College Student Journal,
34 (1),155- 161.
Linn, R.L., Gronlund, N.E., (1995). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 7th
ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, USA.
Rivard, L. P., (1994). A Review of Writing To Learn In Science: Implications
of Practice And Research, Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
31, 969- 984.
Russell, N., Willinsky, J., (1997). Fourth Generation Educational Evaluation: The
Impact of A Post-Modern Paradigm on School Based Evaluation, Studies
in Educational Evaluation, 23 (3), 187-199.
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., Brown, S., (1997). ”But is it fair”: An exploratory study
of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment, Studies
in Educational Evaluation, 23 (4), 349-371.
Stiggins, R.J., (2002). Assessment Crisis; The Absence of Assessment For Learning,
Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (10), 758-766.
Tillema, H.H., Smith, K., (2000). Learning From Portfolios: Differential Use
of Feedback in Portfolio Construction, Studies in Educational Evaluation,
26,193- 210.
Treagust, D.F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallager, J.J., Parker, J., (2001). Using Assessment
As A Guide in Teaching For Understanding: A Case Study of A Middle
School Science Class Learning About Sound, Sci.Edu., 85, 137-157.
Towns, M.H., Grant E.R., (1997). ”I Believe I Will Go Out of This Class Actually
Knowing Something”: Cooperative Learning Activities In Physical
Chemistry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (8), 819-835.
Turgut, M.F., (1997). Eğitimde Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme, Onuncu Baskı, Tıpkı
Basım, Ankara.
Wiske, M.S., Sick, M., Wirsig, S., (2001). New Technologies to support teaching
for understanding, International Journal of Educational research,35,483-
501.
Yalçın, M., (2003). Sürekli Değerlendirmenin Fizikokimya Öğretiminde Rehber
Olarak Kullanımı: Bir Durum Çalışması, Basılmamış doktora tezi , Atatürk
Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
Zeichner, K., Wray S., (2001). The Teaching Portfolio In US Teacher Education
Programs: What We Know And What We Need To Know, Teaching
and Teacher Education, 17, 613-621.
()
().

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com