You are here

Home » Content

DÖNÜT BEKLENTİSİ VE EFL ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN İNGİLİZCE BAŞARISI

FEEDBACK EXPECTANCY AND EFL LEARNERS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN ENGLISH

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aims to explore the relationship between feedback expectancy of Iranian learners of English and their level of education, achievement in English, and attitude toward peer and teacher feedback. To fulfil the purpose of this study, a sixty-item questionnaire focusing on issues related to feedback expectancy, peer feedback, teacher feedback, and cultural factors was developed. 533 junior and high school students participated in the study. The results showed that (1) feedback expectancy in higher levels of education is stronger; (2) a positive and moderate correlation exists between feedback expectancy and learners’ English achievements; high achievers of English expect more feedback; (3) feedback received from teachers is more expected than from peers; (4) female learners sought more feedback from their peers and teachers than male learners. As providing language learners with clear feedback plays a crucial role in developing learners’ language abilities and helping them direct their learning, this study suggests language program developers and teachers to motivate learners to seek feedback from several sources.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalısma 1ran’da 1ngilizce ögrenen ögrencilerin dönüt beklentisi ile egitim düzeyleri, 1ngilizce ögrenmedeki basarıları ve akran ve ögretmen dönütüne karsı tutumları arasındaki iliskiyi arastırmayı hedeflemektedir. Çalısmanın amacına uygun olarak dönüt beklentisi, akran dönütü, ögretmen dönütü ve kültürel etkenlere odaklanmıs 60 soruluk bir anket gelistirilmis ve bu anket ortaokul ve lise düzeyindeki ögretim kurumlarında 1ngilizce ögrenen 533 ögrenci üzerinde uygulanmıstır. Elde edilen bulgular göstermistir ki: 1) Daha üst egitim düzeylerinde dönüt beklentisi daha güçlü olmaktadır 2) Ögrencilerin dönüt beklentileri ile 1ngilizce ögrenmedeki basarı düzeyleri arasında dogru orantılı bir iliski vardır. Yüksek basarı gösteren ögrenciler daha büyük bir dönüt beklentisi içerisindedirler 3) Ögretmen dönütü beklentisi akran dönütü beklentisinden daha fazladır 4) Bayan ögrenciler erkek ögrencilere kıyasla ögretmen ve akranlarından daha fazla dönüt beklentisi içerisindedirler. Yabancı dil egitimi alan ögrencilere açıklıkla dönüt vermek onların dil yetilerini gelistirmelerinde ve dil ögrenme süreçlerini yönlendirmelerinde yasamsal öneme sahip oldugu için bu çalısma dil programı gelistiricileri ve yabancı dil ögretmenlerinin, ögrencileri dönüt beklentisi içinde olmaya güdülemesini önermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 86-408-1-pb.pdf
  • 2
181-196
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahmadizadeh, Z. (2001). On the use of Metacognitive strategies by Iranian EFL
learners in different educational settings. Unpublished master’s thesis.
University of Tehran.
Barnes, R. (1999). Positive teaching positive learning. London: Routledge.
Brown, D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. New Jersy:
Prentice hall Regents.
Butler, D. & Winne, P. (1995). Review of Educational Research, 65 (3) ,
245-281.
Carnell, E. (2000) Dialogue, discussion and secondary school students on how
others help their learning (pp. 46-61). In Askew (Ed.), Feedback for
Learning (pp. 46- 61). London: Routledge .
Chaudron, G. (1988). Second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Craven, R. , Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. (1991). Effects of internally focused
feedback and attributional feedback on enhancement of academic selfconcept.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (1), 17- 27.
Ellis, R. (1991). Instructed second langage acquisition. Oxford : Blackwell
Publishers.
Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment.
London: The Falmer Press.
Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1991). Looking in classrooms. New York:
HarperCollins Publishers.
Griffee, D. T. (1997). Using goals and feedback to improve student performance
on vocabulary homework. The Language Teacher, 21 (7), 19-25.
Jacobs, G. , Curtis, A. Braine, G. & Huang, S. (1998). Feedback on student writing:
taking the middle path. Journal of second language writing, 7(3). 307-317.
Kessler, C. Quinn, M.E. & Fathman, A. k. (1992). Science and cooperative learning
for LEP students. In Carolyn Kessler(ed.) Cooperative learning: a teacher’s
resource book. (pp. 65-83). NJ: prentice Hall.
Murphy, D. F. (1986). Communication and correction in the classroom. ELT
Journal, 40 (2), 146-151.
Pica, T. , Lincoln-Porter, F., Panions, D. , & Linnell, J. (1996). Language
Learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs
of L2 learners? TESOL QUARTERLY, 30 (1), 59-69.
Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (1990). Second language teacher education.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Dictionary of language teaching and
applied linguistics. (2nd ed.). Essex: Longman.
Roskams, T. (1999). Chinese EFL students’ attitudes to peer feedback and peer
assessment in an extended pairwork setting. RELC Journal, 30 (1), 79-109.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com