Buradasınız

The Effect of Visual Mapping on Attitude toward Organizational Strategy: Scale Development and Application in Europe and China

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Visual representations of information can offer several benefits compared to text communication. This study examines the effect of knowledge visualization, compared to a text control condition, on attitude toward the content, specifically an organizational strategy.Companies operating across borders face great challenges in ensuring compliance with the strategy in different cultural contexts. Recent research evidence showcases the cognitive and emotional benefits of utilizing visual representations of knowledge in organizations. An experiment is conducted comparing two knowledge maps to a textual version of the same corporate strategy. In order to measure attitudes toward the strategy, a scale is developed and tested in Europe and China. The study outcome provides a parsimonious and effective tripartite scale of attitude toward strategy with cognitive, affective and behavioral components. The scale is then applied to a different sample to test the effect of mapping the strategy visually on attitudes toward the strategy, and to test whether the effect is persistent in Europe and China. The results of the experiment show that subjects exposed to the visual conditions had a significant more positive affective and cognitive attitude toward the content.
23
41

REFERENCES

References: 

Adler, N. J. (1983). Cross-cultural management research: The ostrich and the trend.
Academy of management Review, 8(2), 226-232.
Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 50: 179-211.
Alexander, L. D. 1985. Successfully Implementing Strategic Decisions.Long Range
Planning, 18: 91-97.
Allport, G. W. 1935. Attitudes. In C. Murchinson (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology:
798–844. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Bertschi, S., Bresciani, S., Crawford, T., Goebel, R., Kienreich, W., Lindner, M., Sabol, V.,
& Vande Moere, A. 2012. What is Knowledge Visualization? Perspectives on an
Emerging Discipline. In: Francis T. Marchese and Ebad Banissi (eds.), Knowledge
Visualization Currents: from Text to Art to Culture (pp. 13-34). London: Springer.
Bresciani S. 2014.Do you see what I see? The effect of culture on the reception of visual
communication.In: S. Poutiainen (Ed.), Theoretical Turbolence in Intercultural
Communication Studies (pp. 81-100). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars
Publishing.
Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL, U.S.: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Eppler, M. J., & Burkhard, R. 2005. Knowledge Visualization. In D. G. Schwartz (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management: IGI.
Eppler, M. J., & Ge, J. 2008. Communicating with Diagrams: How Intuitive and Crosscultural
are Business Graphics? Euro Asia Journal of Management, 18: 3-22.
Fenton, E. M. (2007). Visualising Strategic Change: The Role and Impact of Process Maps
as Boundary Objects in Reorganisation. European Management Journal, 25(2), 104-
117.
Godet, M. 1998. Internal motivation and external strategy: The same challenge! Long
Range Planning, 31: 319-324.
Harkness, J. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Mohler, P.P. 2003. Cross-cultural Survey
Methods. Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, N.J.
Messaris, P. 1997. Visual persuasion: the role of images in advertising. Thousand Oaks,
Calif.: SAGE Publications.
Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 2, issue 4, 2014
40
Mitchell, A. A. 1986. The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on
brand attitude and attitude toward the advertisement. The Journal of Consumer
Research, 3 (1): 12-25.
Nisbett, R. E. 2005. The Geography of Thought. Finland: Bookwel.
O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. 2002. Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for
Cognitive Processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14 (1): 71-86.
Paivio, A. 1969. Mental Imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological
Review, 76 (3): 241-263.
Peng, W., & Litteljohn, D. 2001. Organisational Communication and Strategy
Implementation-A Primary Inquiry. International Journal of Contemporary
Hospitality, 13: 360-363.
Platts, K. W, & Tan, K. H. 2004. Strategy visualisation: knowing, understanding, and
formulating. Management Decision, 42 (5/6): 667-676.
Ray, M. L., & Batra, R. 1982. Emotion and Persuasion in Advertising. Research Paper No.
661, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, CA.
Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. 1960. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components
of attitudes. In C.I. Hovland, & M.J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and
change: 1-14. New Heaven, C.T.: Yale University Press.
Samovar, L., Porter, R., & McDaniel, E. (2011). Intercultural communication: A reader.
Cengage Learning.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. 1980. A Standardized Set of 260 Pictures: Norms for
Name Agreement, Image Agreement, Familiarity, and Visual Complexity. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6 (2): 174-215.
Sojka, J. Z., & Giese, J. L. 2006. Communicating Through Pictures and Words:
Understanding the Role of Affect and Cognition in Processing Visual and Verbal
Information. Psychology & Marketing, 23 (12): 995-1014.
Suthers, D.D. 2005. Collaborative Knowledge Construction through Shared
Representations. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on
System Sciences, (HICSS’05), Big Island, HI, USA.
Tversky, B. 2005. Visuospatial reasoning. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), Handbook
of Reasoning (pg. 209-249). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Zhao, X., Li, H., & Rauch, A. (2012). Cross-Country Differences in Entrepreneurial
Activity: The Role of Cultural Practice and National Wealth. Frontiers of Business
Research in China, 6(4), 447-474.
Yakura, E.K. 2002. Timelines as Temporal Boundary Objects. Academy of Management
Journal, (45) 5: 956-970.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com