Buradasınız

Okul Yöneticileri ve Öğretmenlerin Bilgi Yönetimi Tutumları ile Öğrenen Okul Algıları Arasındaki İlişki

Relationship between Information Management Attitudes and Learning School Perceptions of School Administrators and Teachers

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Strong societies are, today, the societies that have and use knowledge (Muratoğlu 2005). Thus, it is essential to produce information and even to share knowledge from other organizations in order to produce intellectual value in organizations (Dowling vd. 2008). When analysing the existing literature, it is possible to say that organizational learning is closely related to knowledge management. In organizations, knowledge the acquisition, knowledge sharing, knowledge interpretation and knowledge storage into the organizational memory have, at the same time, the characteristic of organizational learning. Thus, it would be a correct statement to say that the concepts of knowledge management and organizational learning are complements of each other (Spender 2008). King et al.'s (2008) study which explains organizational knowledge management with organizational learning model clearly specifies that organizational learning stages and knowledge management concepts interact with each other and have complementary features. In addition, Lyes & Easterby-Smith (2003) have emphasized that the relationships between learning organization and knowledge management should be identified and these two concepts should be discussed together. The aim of this study is to analyse the regression level for learning school perceptions of teachers and administrators' knowledge management attitudes. In this context, the study is structured as a descriptive study based on the screening model. According to Karasar (2003), the event, subject or individual that is subject to the study is tried to be identified within its own conditions and the way it is. Within this framework, in the study, the regression level for learning school perceptions of the knowledge management attitudes of the teachers and the administrators working in educational institutions is evaluated the way it exists. Population of the study; school administrators and teachers working in primary and secondary education institutions under the Ministry of Education in Zara, Hafik, Ġmranlı districts of Sivas. As of September 2012, the total number of the teachers and administrators who work in the said districts is 367. Sampling was not applied in this study. Reaching the population was aimed. However, since the participation was based on a voluntary basis and due to the incomplete filling, in September 2012, 336 people on duty were reached in Sivas, 55 of whom were school administrators and 281 of whom were teachers. Data collection phase; in the study, the Knowledge Management Attitudes Scale developed by Demir (2005) and Learning Organization (School) scale developed by the studyers Uğurlu, Doğan and Yiğit. Accordingly, by combining two scales developed, a data collection tool was created composed of two parts. In the first part, Learning School Perceptions Scale consisting of 20 clauses was included while the "Knowledge Management Attitudes Scale" consisting of 22 clauses was included in the second part. The package program SPSS for Windows 17.0 was used in the analysis of the data obtained during the study. Simple Regression and Multiple Regression techniques were used in order to determine whether there was a relationship or not between Knowledge Management Attitudes and Learning Organization (school) perceptions of the teachers and school administrators. In the study, since the number of administrators was inadequate, teachers and administrators were evaluated together and the analysis was done through the total number of teachers and administrators. According to the findings of the study, Knowledge Management Attitudes with its subdimensions "Self-Improvement, Communication, Commitment Attitudes" is in the position of the precursor of "Shared Vision" behaviours, the sub-dimension of Learning Organization (School) (R=0,394, R²=0,155, p< .05) and they together states approximately 16% of the "Shared Vision" behaviour; Knowledge Management Attitudes with its sub-dimensions "Self- Improvement, Communication, Commitment Attitudes" is in the position of the precursor of "Personal Dominance" behaviours, the sub-dimension of Learning Organization (School), (R=0,569, R²=0,324, p< .05) and they together states approximately 32% of the "Personal Dominance" behaviour; Knowledge Management Attitudes with its sub-dimensions "Self- Improvement, Communication, Commitment Attitudes" is in the position of the precursor of "Intellectual Models" behaviours, the sub-dimension of Learning Organization (School), (R=0,220, R²=0,048, p< .05) and they together states approximately 5% of the "Intellectual Models" behaviour; Knowledge Management Attitudes with its sub-dimensions "Self- Improvement, Communication, Commitment Attitudes" is in the position of the precursor of "Learning as a Team" behaviours, the sub-dimension of Learning Organization (School), (R=0,427, R²=0,182, p< .005) and they together states approximately 18% of the "Learning as a Team" behaviour. Based on the findings of the study, the following suggestions can be made: Starting from the relationship between knowledge management and learning organization (school), besides training teachers and administrators for acquisition and use of knowledge, schools should be converted to learning organizations.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, Öğrenen Okul ve Bilgi Yönetimi Yaklaşımları temel alınarak yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın amacı, öğretmenlerin ve okul yöneticilerinin Bilgi Yönetim Tutumları ile Öğrenen Okul algıları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Araştırma, tarama modelinde desenlenmiştir. Bulguların elde edilmesinde Demir (2003) tarafından geliştirilen Bilgi Yönetim Tutumu Ölçeği ve Uğurlu, Doğan ve Yiğit tarafından geliştirilen Öğrenen Okul Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemi Sivas iline bağlı Zara, İmranlı, Hafik ilçelerindeki tüm okullarda çalışmakta olan 281‟ i öğretmen ve 55‟ i okul yöneticisi olmak üzere toplam 336 eğitim çalışanından oluşmaktadır. Bilgi Yönetimi ve Öğrenen Okul arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesinde basit ve çoklu regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda bilgi yönetimi ile öğrenen okul arasında anlamlı ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. Buna göre Bilgi Yönetimi Tutumu “Kendini Geliştirme”, “İletişim” ve “Bağlılık” alt boyutları ile birlikte Öğrenen Okul alt boyutları olan “Paylaşılan Vizyon” davranışının yaklaşık % 16‟sını; Kişisel Hâkimiyet” davranışının yaklaşık % 32‟sini; “Zihni Modeller” davranışının yaklaşık % 5‟ini; “Takım Halinde Öğrenme” davranışının yaklaşık% 18‟ini açıklamaktadır.
159
171

REFERENCES

References: 

AĞIR Ahmet (2005). Bilgi Yönetim Sistemleri ve Eğitimde Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi Uygulaması,
Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.d.t., Ġstanbul.
AKGÜN Ali Ekber, KESKĠN Halit ve GÜNSEL AyĢe (2009). Bilgi Yönetimi ve Öğrenen
Örgütler, Ankara: Eflatun Yayınevi.
AKKOÇ Hasan (2008). Öğrenen Örgüt OluĢumunda Bilgi Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Rolü:
Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Ġktisadi Ġdari Bilimler Fakültesi Uygulaması, Kocatepe
Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.yl.t., Afyon.
AKHTAR Naveed ve KHAN Rashed Ahmed (2011). ―Exploring the Paradox of Organizational
Learning and Learning Organization‖, Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary
ResearchIn Business, C:2,S: 9, s. 257-270.
ALĠPOUR Farhad ve KARĠMĠ Roohangiz (2011). ―Mediation Role of Ġnnovationand Knowledge
Transfer in the Relationship Between Learning Organization and Organizational
Performance‖, International Journal of Business and Social Science, C: 2, S:19, s. 144-147.
168 | S. Doğan & Y. Yiğit
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2014, 33(1), 159-171
BAKAN Ġsmail (2011). ÇağdaĢ Yönetim YaklaĢımları Ġlkeler, Kavramlar ve YaklaĢımlar,
Ġstanbul: Beta Yayın Dağıtım A.ġ.
BAL Özgü (2011). Ġlköğretim Okullarında Görev Yapan Okul Yöneticisi ve Öğretmenlerin
Öğrenen Örgüt Olarak Okullarına ĠliĢkin Algıları (BaĢakĢehir Örneği), Yıldız Teknik
Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.yl.t., Ġstanbul.
BEJĠNARU Ruxandra ve LORDACHE Stefan (2011). ―Intellectual Capital Dynamics Within the
Learning Organization‖, The 3rd European Conference On Intellectual Capital Held at
University of Nicosia. April 2011, Cyprus.
BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK ġener (2007). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi, Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
CALDWELL Raymond (2012). ―Leadership and Learning: A Critical Reexamination of Senge‘s
Learning Organization‖, Systemic Practice and Action Research, C: 25, S: 1, s. 39–55.
DEMĠR Kamile (2003). ―Bilgi Yönetimi Tutum Ölçeği‖, Eğitim AraĢtırmaları Dergisi, S: 20, s.
113-121.
DEMĠR Kamile (2005). ―Ġl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü Yönetim Bilgi Sistemlerinin Ġncelenmesi‖,
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi. S: 36, s. 558-581.
DOWLĠNG Beth vd. (2004). ―Knowledge Management: Enablers And Barriers To Knowledge
Sharing Ġn Organizations‖, Management Review, C: 41, S: 2, s. 79-94.
FOROZANDEH Lotfallah vd. (2011). ―Studying the Relationship Between Components of the
Learning Organization and Organizational Commitment‖, Interdisciplinary Journal of
Contemporary Research In Business, C:3, S: 6, s. 497-509.
GÜÇLÜ Nezahat ve SOTIROFSKI Kseanela (2006). ―Bilgi Yönetimi‖, Türk Eğitim Bilimleri
Dergisi, C: 4, S: 4, s. 351-371.
HAWAMDEH Basem ve JARADAT Mohammed H. (2012). ―Basics of the Learning
Organization at Jordanian Schools: A Case Study‖, Education, C: 132, S: 3, s. 689-696.
KARASAR Niyazi (2003). Bilimsel AraĢtırma, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
KILIÇ Ferdi (2009). Ortaöğretim Kurumlarında Görev Yapan Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerin
Öğrenen Örgüte ĠliĢkin Algı Düzeyler (Bolu Ġli Örneği), EskiĢehir Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimleri Enstitüsü, y.yl.t., EskiĢehir.
KĠNG William R. CHUNG Rachel T. ve HANEY Mark H. (2008). "Knowledge Management and
Organizationl Learning", Omega, C: 36, S: 2, s. 167-172.
KOÇEL Tamer (2001). ĠĢletme Yöneticiliği- Yönetim ve Organizasyon, Ġstanbul: Beta Basım.
LYLES Marjorie ve EASTERBY-SMĠTH Mark (2003). ―Organizational Learning and Knowledge
Management: Agendas for Future Research", The Black well Handbook of Organizational
Learning and Knowledge Management, s. 639-652.
MEMDUHOĞLU Hasan Basri ve YILMAZ KürĢad (2010). Yönetimde Yeni YaklaĢımlar,
Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
MURATOĞLU Vecihe (2005). Eğitim Örgütlerinde Bilgi Yönetimi Stratejileri, Fırat Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, y.yl.t.,Elazığ.
SPENDER J.-C. (2008). ―Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Whence and
Whither?‖ Management Learning, C:39, S: 2, s. 159-176.
TEE Ng Pak (2004). ―The Learning Organisation and the Ġnnovative Organisation‖, Human
Systems Management, S: 23, s. 93-100.
Bilgi Yönetimi Tutumu ve Öğrenen Okul Algısı | 169
ISSN: 1300-302X © 2014 OMÜ EĞĠTĠM FAKÜLTESĠ
TĠLTAY Mehmet Ali (2009). Anadolu Üniversitesi‘nin Öğrenen Örgüt Olma Özelliklerine
ĠliĢkin Öğretim Elemanlarının GörüĢleri, EskiĢehir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
y.yl.t.,EskiĢehir.
ÜZÜM Sefa (2009). Resmi Ġlköğretim Okullarında Örgütsel Öğrenme Aracı Olarak Bilgi
Yönetimi, Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, y.yl.t.,Ġstanbul.
TURAN Selahattin ve KARADAĞ Engin (2011). ―Üniversite Yapısı Ġçerisinde Öğrenen Örgüt ve
Örgütsel Bağlılık ĠliĢkisi Üzerine Bir AraĢtırma‖, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi
Dergisi, C: 17, S: 4, s. 627-638.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com