Buradasınız

Game Analysis of the Knowledge Sharing Mechanism for the Supply Chain Collaborative Innovation

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1368
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: In information economy era, innovation is the key to improve the competitiveness of enterprises. The traditional way of enterprise innovation is outdated and supply chain collaborative innovation has becoming popular. This paper aims to analyze the mechanism of knowledge sharing between enterprises in supply chain collaborative innovation. Design/methodology/approach: This paper analyzes the supply chain members’ willingness to share knowledge by using the game theory. The result of knowledge sharing between two companies is analyzed by using the evolutionary game. Findings: We broke the knowledge sharing process in supply chain collaborative innovation into knowledge mining and knowledge transferring. We got the best knowledge sharing strategy of each supply chain member. We gave the influencing factors of knowledge sharing between members for the knowledge sharing mechanisms in supply chain collaborative innovation. Research limitations/implications: We didn’t study the willingness of more than two supply chain members to share knowledge and the result of knowledge sharing between them. And this situation is more realistic. Practical implications: Our findings can help to improve the effect of knowledge sharing in supply chain collaborative innovation. Originality/value: The paper introduces the game theory to knowledge sharing between members in supply chain collaborative innovation, deepens the understanding of knowledge sharing in supply chain collaborative innovation, and gives some interesting findings.
152
169

REFERENCES

References: 

Batrol, K.M., & Srivastave, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of
organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900105
Bello, D.C., Lohtia, R., & Sangtani, V. (2004). An institutional analysis of supply chain
innovations in global marketing channels. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 57-64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.011
Choi, T.Y., & Krause, D.R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity implications for
transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management,
24(5), 637-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.07.002
Connelly, C.E., & Kelloway, E.K. (2003). Predictors of employee’ perceptions of knowledge
sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5), 294-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730310485815
Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L. (1999). Operation knowledge. Nan Chang: Jiang Xi Education
Press.
Dixon, N.M. (2000). Common knowledge: how companies thrive on sharing what they know.
New York: Harvard University Press.
Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for
knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6, 91-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/
(SICI)1099-1441(199906)6:2<91::AID-KPM54>3.0.CO;2-M
Holthouse, D. (2006). Knowledge research issue. California Management Review, 43(3),
277-280.
Jin, H., Yang, Z., Huang, Y.T., & Wu, J. (2013). Exploring how organizational incentives and
organizational culture affect knowledge sharing based on modified SIT. Studies in Science of
Science, 31, 1697-1707.
Lee, J.N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership
quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & Management, 38(5), 323-335.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00074-4
Li, W.D., & Liu, H . (2014). An empirical study on relationship of mutual trust and R&D
professionals’ knowledge sharing intentions: the mediating effects of knowledge power loss
and reciprocity. Management Review, 26, 128-138.
O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C.J. (1998). If only we knew what we know: the transfer of internal
knowledge and best practice. New York: New York Free Press.
Ruggles, R. (1998). The state of notion: Knowledge management in practice. California
Management Review, 40, 80-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165944
Senge, P.M. (2006). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New
York: Random House Business.
Tan, M. (1994). Establishing mutual understanding in systems design: an empirical study.
Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 159-182.
Wang, J.R., & Yang, J. (2012). Relationship of trust, team interaction and knowledge sharing
behavior. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 33, 31-39.
Wang, L.L., & Zhang, Y.J. (2008). The interaction between implicit knowledge protection and
knowledge sharing in science research team of college. Science and Technology Management
Research, 7, 242-243.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com