Systemic Assessment Framework of a Learning Organization's Competitive Positioning

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to devise an innovative feasible, replicable and comprehensive assessment framework of a learning organization's competitive positioning. Design/methodology/approach: The three characteristics listed above are approached as follows. Feasible refers to being easy and not in need of much resources (time, personnel,...). This is done through early elimination of non-important variables. Replicable is having a well structured methodology based on scientific proven methods. Following this methodology would result in good results that can be explained if needed and replicated if deemed necessary. Comprehensive translates into a holistic set of indices that measure performance as well as organizational learning. Findings: The three attributes (feasible, replicable and comprehensive) have become crucial for ensuring any kind of added value for such a methodology that hopes to tackle the modern dynamic business environment and gaining a sustainable competitive advantage. Research limitations/implications: Such a methodology would require several full contextual applications to be able to set its final design. It entails thorough internal revision of a company's structure. Therefore a great deal of transparency and self-transcendence from the individual involved is a pre-requisite for any chance of success. Originality/value: It offers a systematic way to assess a company's performance/competitive positioning while accounting for the crucial attribute of organizational learning in its makeup.



Alcantara, R.M.P., & Nobrega, G.M. (2005). Modelling for Learning Organizations and
Qualitative Reasoning: Grounding a Case Study within IT Management. IJCAI Workshop on
Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories.
Amrina, E., & Yusof, S.M. (2011). Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Manufacturing
Evaluation in Automotive Companies. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
International Conference of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Singapore.
Arias, J., & Solona, J. (2013). Information Systems Supported Organizational Learning as a
Competititve Advantage. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(3), 702-708.
Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S.F., Partovi Miran, Y., Ebrahimipour, V., & Suzuki, K. (2007). An
integrated framework for continuous assessment and improvement of manufacturing
systems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186, 1216-1233.
Beamon, B. (1998). Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Models and Methods. International
Journal of Production Economics, 55 (3), 281-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00079-6
Berns, M. Townend, A., Khayat, Z. Balagopal, B., Reeves, M., Hopkins, M.S. et al. (2009).
Sustainability and Competitive Advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1).
Bishwas, S., & Sushil. (2012). Knowledge Management and Related Emerging Issues in
Organizations: A Systems Thinking using Feedback Loop Analysis. System Dynamics Conference.
Bozbura, F., & Beskese, A. (2007). Prioritization of Organizational capital measurement
indicators using fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 44, 124-147.
Carter, C., Kaufmann, L., & Michel, A. (2007). Behavioral Supply Management: A Taxonomy of
Judgment and Decision-Making Biases. International Journal of Physical Distribution &
Logistics Management, 37(8), 631-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600030710825694
Cho, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Development of a new technology product evaluation model for
assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach.
Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 5314-5330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.038
Doyle, J.K., & Ford, D.N. (1998). Mental Models Concepts for System Dynamics Research.
System Dynamics Review, 14(1), 3-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199821)14:1<3::AIDSDR140>
Dreyer, L.K., Hauschild, M.Z., & Schierbeck, J. (2010). Characterisation of social impacts in
LCA. Part 1: Development of indicators for labour right. International Journal of Life Cycle
Assessment, 15(3), 247-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0148-7
Dyk, D., & Pretorius, L. (2012). A System Dynamics Approach to Quality Improvement
Programs in a Heavy Engineering Manufacturing Environment: A Case Study. Proceedings of
PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, p. 3287-3296.
Ford, A. (1999). Modelling the Environment: An introduction to System Dynamics Models of
Environmental Systems. United States of America, Island Press.
Ford, D. (1998). A behavioural Approach to Feedback Loop Dominance Analysis. System
Dynamics Conference.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2002). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Available at:
Haag, H., & Tilebein, M. (2012). Integrating System Dynamics in a Strategic Foresight Process
for Firms in Production Networks. International Conference on System Dynamics.
Hayward, J. (2012). Model Behaviour and the Strengths of Causal Loops: Mathematical
Insights and a Practical Method. International System Dynamics Conference, Switzerland.
Hosseini-Nasab, H., Dehghani, M., & Hosseini-Nasab, A. (2013). Analysis of Technology
Effectiveness of Lean Manufacturing Using System Dynamics. ISRN Industrial Engineering.
Jain, S., & Kibira, D. (2010). A Framework for Multi-Resolution Modeling of Sustainable
Manufacturing. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.
Kamath, N., & Roy, R. (2007). Capacity augmentation of a supply chain for a short lifecycle
product: A system dynamics framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 179,
334-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.045
Keij, R., & Ashayeri, J. (2008). Global business process re-engineering: a system
dynamics-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
18(9/10), 817-831.
Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal K., & Van Wassenhove, L.N. (2005). Sustainable Operations
Management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482-492.
Lizeo, E. (2000). The influence of Learning Behaviour on the Performance of Work Teams- A
System Dynamics Approach. Unpublished master's thesis. Massachusetts Institute of
Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2013). Ideantifying and Ranking of Strategies to
Implement Green Supply Chain Management in Indian Manufacturing Industry Using
Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4),
930-962. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.693
Magzan, M. (2012). Mental Models for Leadership Effectiveness: Building Future Different than
the Past. Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness, 2(2), 57-63.
Martin-de-Castro, G., Navas-Lopez, J., Lopez-Saez, P., & Alama-Salazar, E. (2005).
Organizational Capital as Competitive Advantage of the Firm. Journal of Intellectual Capital,
7(3), 324-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14691930610681438
Morecroft, J. (1994). Modeling for Learning Organizations. Portland, Oregon: Productivity
Nemeth, L. (1997). Measuring Organizational Learning. Unpublished master's thesis. University
of Western Ontario.
Nyikos, D., & Thal, A. (2012). To leed or not to leed: Analysis of cost premiums associated with
sustainable facility design. Engineering Management Journal, 24(4), 50-63.
O'Rourke, N., & Hatcher, L. (2013). A Step-by-Step Approach to Using SAS®for Factor Analysis
and Structural Equation Modelling. Second Edition. North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.
O'Rourke, N., Hatcher, L., & Stepanksi, E. (2005). A Step-by-Step Approach to Using SAS® for
Univariate & Multivariate Statistics. North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.
Pablos, P. de. (2003). Measuring and reporting knowledge-based resources: the intellectual
capital report. Available at:
Petroni, A., & Braglia, M. (2000). Vendor Selection Using Principal Component Analysis. The
journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply, 63-69.
RobecoSam Sustainability Investing. (2013). The Sustainability Yearbook 2013. Switzerland:
Saaty, T., & Vargas, L. (2006). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic,
Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks.
New York: Springer.
Seligman, J. (2005). Building a Systems Thinking Culture at Ford Motor Company. The society
for Organizational Learning Journal, 6(4/5).
Senge, P.M. (1990).The Fith Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New
York: Currency DoubleDay.
Soderlund, M., & Vilgon, M. (1993). Stability and Change in Decision Makers' Perceptions of the
firms's environment: An Empirical Case Study of Causal Attribution by a Top Management
Te am. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(1), 121-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-
Syed, N. & Xiaoyan, L. (2013). The Linkage Between Knowledge Management Practices and
Company Performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(1), 1-7.
Tahriri, F., Rasid Osman, M., Ali, A., Yusuff, R.M., & Esfandiary, A. (2008). AHP approach for
supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company. Journal of Industrial
Engineering and Management, 1(2), 54-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2008.v1n2.p54-76
Vachon, S. (2007). Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental
technologies. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4357-4379.
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2010) Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management and
Intellectual Capital: An Integrative Conceptual Model. Available at:
Wang, C., & Ahmed, P. (2002). A Review of the Concept of Organisational Learning. Working
paper series. University of Wolverhampton, ISSN 1363-6839.
Yoshida, H., Takahashi, K., & Takeda, N. (2009). Japan’s waste management policies for dioxins
and polychlorinated biphenyls. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 11(3),
229-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10163-008-0235-z
Yu, M., Chu, J., & Yang, J. (2012). Green building and real estate industry sustainable
development. Management & Engineering, 9, 107-111.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com