Research on the relationship of institutional innovation, organizational learning and synergistic effect: An empirical study of Chinese university spin-offs

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: At present, the Central Government of China pays more attention to the synergistic innovation, and the national strategy policy of “innovation driven development” are made to implementations. Thus, the university plays an important role in the national innovation system, so that how the university gets involved in innovative activities becomes the primary problem of innovation strategy. This paper utilizes Chinese university spin-offs survey data to identify the influence process from institutional innovation and organizational learning to synergistic effect of organization. Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, we found that following the procedural view, each one of these three elements can be divided into two parts. Then, we established structural equation modeling with the connections between these six subdivisions. Secondly, by taking 270 university Spin-offs in China as samples, we verified the fit of the model through statistical data on the questionnaire survey. Thirdly, we analyzed the relationship and influence path of the institutional innovation, organizational learning and synergistic effect. Findings: The results of empirical research show that institutional implementation process is positive correlation on both sides of synergistic effect, and, the intermediary role is obvious that external organizational learning played a regulatory role between institutional innovation synergistic effects.Research limitations/implications: A large-scale questionnaire survey showed that the influence path of “institutions -organization-innovation performance” are existed. Therefore, the system analysis framework should be introduced to the emergence and development of University spin-offs, and further explored the synergistic process of institutional change and organizational evolution. Practical implications: University spin-offs are a mode of university – industry cooperation, and it takes participation in market competition also as enterprise. This result of study pointed that. “Institutions” and “organizations” are the two important factors in synergistic innovation, so the synergy mechanism design should be followed by the interaction relationship between these two above. Originality/value: Synergistic innovation is the guidance theory which leads the development trend of university-industrial cooperation in China. In this paper, the “institution” and “organization”, as the two primary elements, are introduced to analyze the process of synergistic innovation. Then, the authors discussed the role of the “institutional innovation” and “organizational learning” in the process of synergistic innovation, aimed at study on the operational mechanism of the influence factors.



Cai, W. (2012). Co-evolution mechanism and empirical analysis of technology innovation.
Institution innovation and industry system. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences),
14(5), 401-406.
Chen, G., & Wang, X. (2012). The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism on the
Relationship Between Organizational Learning and Performance. R&D Management, 24(1),
Chen, M. (2013). Suggestions on scientific evaluation and “2011 project”. Interview the Chen
Maozhang the academician of CAE and professor of BUAA. Chinese University Technology
Transfer, 3, 4-9.
Hao, Y. (2005). A Study of Institutional Alternative for Hi-tech Industry Development of
China's Universities. PhD. Thesis. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Jia, Y., & Jia, L. (2012). Empirical study with SEM on sustainable development driving factors of
technological firms based on university. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 36(5), 143-148.
Jia, Y., & Zhang, H. (2013). Study on the Synergy Mode of University-Industry Collaboration
Based on the View of Institutional Innovation. China Higher Education Research, 1, 37-39.
Li, X. (2011). Collaborative innovation is the best form and pathway of improving the
independent innovation ability and efficiency. Science and Technology Daily.
Li, Y. & Ma, Y. (2001). The theory grasp of interactions between technology innovation and
institution innovation the comparison between Marxism economics and New institutional
economics. Economic Science, 1, 87-93.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A
comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological
Methods, 7(1), 83-104.
McKee, D. (1992). An organizational learning approach to product innovation. Journal of
Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 232-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(92)90033-9
Nelson, R., Winter, G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Massachusetts:
Harvard University Press.
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management – http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.950
Sehein, E. (1985). 0rganizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Xie, H., Ge, Z., & Wang, C. (2008). On the Relation of Social Capital, Organizational Learning
and Organizational Innovation: An Experiential Study of Companies in Pearl River Delta
Region of China. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 1, 5-10.
Xie, H., & Han, Z. (2005). Organizational learning and organizational performance: is
innovation a missing link? Science Research Management, 26(5), 1-10.
Xu, X., & Xu, Y. (2008). The study on synergy degree of Enterprise technology innovation,
system innovation and continuous growth. Dong Yue Tribune, 29(2), 80-85.
Xue, J., & Ma, H. (2013). Suggestions on scientific evaluation and "2011 project"_interview the
CHEN Maozhang the academician of CAE and professor of BUAA. Chinese University
Technology Transfer, 3, 4-9.
Wang, F., & Feirong, Y. (2013). An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between organzational
Culture and Technological Innovation Performance Based on Organization al Learning. R&D
Management, 25(1), 36-43.
Wang, Y., & Ellinger, A.D. (2011). Organizational learning: Perception of external environment
and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5/6), 512-536.
Wu, M. (2009). Structural Equation Model_the Application and Operation of Amos. Chongqing:
Chongqing University Press,
Zhou, Y., & Li, Y. (2005). Research on the relationship of organizational learning capability and
choice of innovation type. Study in Science of Science, 23(4), 525-530.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com