Buradasınız

DİŞHEKİMLİĞİ PRATİĞİNDE HEKİM-HASTA İLİŞKİLERİ

PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP OF THE DENTISTRY PRACTICAL

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
During the last years or so, there has been a struggle over the patient's role in medical decision making that is often characterized as a conflict between autonomy and health, between the values of the patient and the values of the physician. .Seeking to curtail physician dominance, many have advocated an ideal of greater patient control. Others question this ideal because it fails to acknowledge the potentially imbalanced nature of this interaction whenonc party is sick and searchingfor security, and when judgments entail the interpretation of technical information. Still others are trying todclineate a more mutual relationship. This struggle forces us to ask:"'What should be the ideal physician-patient relationship?"
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sağlık alanında hastalara uygulanacak tedavi yönteminin seçiminde, hasta isteklerinin mi yoksa hekim kararının mı daha etkili olması gerektiği son yıllarda giderek artan bir tartışma konusu olmuştur. Pek çok kişi hekimin karar verme yetkisinin dalıa a/, hastanın ise daha fazla kontrole sahip olması gerektiğini savunmuştur. Bazı kişiler ise bu fikri, bir şahıs, hasta olarak yardım ararken ve bu yardımın teknik bilgiye gereksinimi varken doktorun daha etkin olması gerektiğini belirtmişlerdir. Bazıları da daha ortak bir nokta bulmaya çalışmışlardır. Bu tartışmalar, ideal hekim-hasta ilişkisinin nasıl olması gerektiği sorusunu ortaya çıkarmaktadır.
7
12

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Belknap M. Blau R, Grossman R. Case studies and methods in humanistic medical care. San Francisco: Institute for the Study of Humanistic Medicine 1975; 27-28.
2. Comstock 1-. Hooper E. Goodwin JM. Goodwin JS. Physician behaviors that correlate with patient satifaction. J Med Educ 1982; 57: 105-12.
3. Eddy DM. Anatomy of a decision. JAMA 1990;263:441-43.
4. Forest L. The evolving roles of the patient and physician. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9: 57-64.
5. Johnson D, Marvyama G, Johnson R, Nelson D, Skon L. Effects of cooperative, copetitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta - analysis. Psychol Bull 1981; 89: 47-67.
6. Ley P. Communication with patients. New York: Croom Helm, 1988.
7. Korsch B. Negrete V. Doktor - patient communication. Sci Amer 1972; 227: 66-74.
8. Lester G, Smith S. Listening and talking lo patients - a remedy for malpractice suits? West J Med 1993; 158: 268-72.
9. Waitzkin H. Doctor - patient communication: Clinical implications of social scientific reserach. JAMA 1984; 252: 2441-46.
10. Levy D, White doctors and black patients: Influence of race on the doktor - patient relationship. Pediatrics 1985; 75: 4; 639-43.
11. Ingelfinger FJ. Ethics of the experiments on children. N Eng J Med 1973; 288: 791-92.
12. Miller S. Introduction: The present cultural crisis and the need for a humanistic medicine. Dimensions of humanistic medicine. San Francisico: Institute for the Study of HumanisticMedicine 1975; 11-28.
13. Quill T. Recodnizing and adjusting to barriers in doktor - patient communication. Ann Int Med 1989: 111: 51-57.
14. Di Matteo M. Physician - patient communication promoting a positive health -care setting. Ed: Rosen J, Solomon . Prevention in health psycology. Hanover NH: University Press of New England 1985; 9-111.
15. Emanuel EJ. Emanuel LI.. Four models of the physician - patient relationship. JAMA 1992; 267: 2221-26.
16. Quill T. Partnership in patient care: A contractual approach. Ann hit Med 1983; 98: 228-34.
17. Roter D, Hall J. Katz N. Patient - physician communication: A descriptive summary of the literature. Parent Ed and counseling 1988; 12: 99-119.
\2
Ayşegül APAYDİN. Byashmyrat VAZDURDİVEV
18. Roter D, Hall J. Doctors talking with patients / Patients talking with doctors. Westport, Conn: Auburn Hous 1992; 26-55.
19. Shapiro R. Simpson D. Lawrence S. A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients. Arch Int Med 1989; 149: 2190-96.
20. Remen N. The masculine principle, the feminine principle and humanistic medicine.
21. San Francisco: Institute for the Study of Humanistic Medicine 1975; 17-90.
22. Gordon T, Edwards WS. Making the your partner communication skils for doctors and other carigiver. Auburn Hous London, 1995; 43-82.
23. Spencer F. The vital role in medicine of commitment to the patient. Am Coll Surg Bull 1990; 75: 6-19.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com