Buradasınız

EXPLORING ADULT LEARNING PRINCIPLES BY KNOWLES AND GENDER DIFFERENCES OF USM DISTANCE LEARNERS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study is aimed at identifying the differences on the adult learning principles by Knowles based on gender with the use of videoconferencing technology. The theoretical foundation for this study is the andragogy theory by Knowles (1980) that holds a set of adult learning principles such as learners’ self concept; motivation to learn, readiness to learn, role of learners’ experience, learners’ need to know and learning orientation. A total of 394 respondents answered the questionnaire distributed to them and collected data were analyzed using chi-square test, t-test and descriptive analysis (mean and standard deviations). The SPSS software version 17 was utilized for data analysis. This study showed that significance differences existed between the adult learning principles by Knowles (1980) with the use of videoconferencing technology based on gender. The researchers recommend that further studies explore other adult learning theories looking at the gender differences besides including a larger sample from different institutions. Male and female students need to have the same opportunities in education with the use of technology to support teaching and learning process.
1
10

REFERENCES

References: 

Abdul, R. H., Mohd, Z. A. N., Mohammad, F. N., Hafiz, M. S., Mohd, S. Z., Yazrina, Y. & Mohd, Z. M. (2004). Information communication & technology. Second Edition. Kuala Lumpur: MzGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Atan, H., Jaafar, I, Guan, S. K., Azli, N. A. & Abd Rahman, Z, Idrus, R. M. (2003). Selftransitional characteristic of distance education learnes: A case study of three Malaysian Universities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 44. Retrived on March 19, 2004]. Available from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde12/articles/Jaafar.htm
Belanger, F. & Jordan, D. H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning:
Technologies, tools and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing Group.
Bray, E., Kumiko, A. & Larry, D. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9 (3), 1-24.
Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and academic performance among students of Business administration. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 311-318.
Carville, S. & Mitchell, D. R. (2001). It's a bit like star trek: The effectiveness of videoconferencing. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37 (1), 42-49.
Dimmick, J., Sikand, J., & Patterson, S. (1994). The gratification of the household telephone: Sociability, instrumentality and reassurance. Communication Research, 21, 643-663.
Demiray, E. & Sensu, C. (2000). Distance education for women’s development: a case study at Anadolu University, Turkey. Jurnal Pendidikan Jarak Jauh, [Online]. 2 (2), retrieved on 19 February 2004. Available from http://www.freewebs.com/mjdisted/pastissues.htm
Fischer, C. S. (1992). American calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
International Women Online Journal of Distance Education
July, 2014 Volume: 3 Issue: 3 Article: 01 ISSN: 2147-0367
9
Copyright © International Women Online Journal of Distance Education / www.wojde.org
W. & Sadatul, M. (2005). 8 basics declaration draft in Putrajaya. Kuala Lumpur: Mingguan, Malaysia.
Holden, G. (1994). Multipoint videoconferencing. Epistolodidaktika, 1, 72-83.
Houtz, L.E., & Gupta, U.G. (2001). Nebraska high school students computer skills and attitudes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), p. 316-328.
Idrus, R. M., Azli, N. A., Rahman, Z. A., Atan, H., Awang, N. M., Jaafar, I. , Saw, K. G., & Laiff, Z. A. (2001). Educational transition characteristics of female distance learners. In: A. Hamzah, N. A. Wahab, F. H. Shah and T. Pham (eds.). Women in the New ICT Era: Challenges and Opportunities. Kuala Lumpur: United Nation Development Programme.
Katz, Y. J. (2002). Attitudes affecting college students’ preferences for distance learning. Journal of Computer assisted Learning, 18, 2-9.
Kear, K., Williams, J., Seaton, R. & Einon, G. (2004). Using information and communication technology in a modular distance learning course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29 (1),17-25.
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge Books.
Kramarae, C. (2001). The third shift: Women learning online. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
Latchem, C., & Rapley, P. (1992) Trial by satellite videoconferencing for continuing education for rural area nurses. Distance Education, 13 (1), 118 – 130.
Lee, I-S. (2002) Gender differences in self-regulated on-line learning strategies within Korea’s University context. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50 (1), p.101-109.
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
Martin, M. (2005). Seeing is believing: The role of videoconferencing in distance learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (3), 397 - 405.
Majid, M. K. (2000). Education research methodology. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Md Noor Saleh. (2001). Distance education. Universiti Sains Malaysia: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
Masood, M. (2004). A ten-year analysis: trends in traditional educational technology literature. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1 (2). Online]. Retrieved on 13 April 2004. Available from http://pppjj.usm.my/mojit/articles/V1N2-final/MOJIT-Mona.htm
Perraton, H. (1993). Distance education for teacher training. New York: Routledge.
International Women Online Journal of Distance Education
July, 2014 Volume: 3 Issue: 3 Article: 01 ISSN: 2147-0367
10
Copyright © International Women Online Journal of Distance Education / www.wojde.org
Richardson, J. T. E. & King, E. (1991). Gender differences in the experience of higher education: Quantitative and qualititative approaches. Educational Psychology, 11, 363-822.
Rooney, P., Hussar, W., Planty, M., Choy, S., Hampden-Thompson, G., Provasnik, S., Fox, M. A., Kridl, B., Livingston, A., & Synder, T. (2006). The condition of education 2006. NCES 2006-071. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. (In ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 491909).
Rose, D. A. D., Furner, S., Hall, A., Montgomery, K., Katsavras, E., & Clarke, P. (2000).
Videoconferencing for speech and language therapy in schools. BT Technology Journal, 18, 101-105.
Santovec, M. (2002). Balancing act: Online learning becomes the “third shift” for women. Distance Education Report, 6 (2), 1-2.
Shaffe Mohd Daud. (2000). Research on the effectiveness of teaching and learning process via videoconferencing in SDE-USM. Doctoral thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Simpson, H. (1991). An experimental two-way video teletraining system: design, development and evaluation. Distance Education, 12 (2), 209 - 231.
Sorenson, C. K. (1995). Evaluation of interactive television instruction: Assessing attitudes of community college students. [Online]. {Accessed 13 April 2004}.
Available from http://www.ed.psu.edu/acsde/deosnews5_9.htm
Thompson Learning. (2002). Blended learning is superior. [Online]. {Accessed 23 August 2006}. Available from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/mar2002/newsbytes.html#mar1
Townes-Young, K. L., & Ewing, V. R. (2005). Creating a global classroom. T.H.E. Journal, 33 (4), 43-5.
Visser, L. (2002). The role of the instructor in helping students to be successful and the role of students in helping the institution to be successful. Open Praxis. 1, 5-9.
Waldeck, J., Kearney, P. & Plax, T. (2001). Teacher e-mail message strategies and students’ willingness to communicate online. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29 (1), 54-70.
West, G. B. (1999). Teaching and technology in higher education: Changes and challenges. Adult Learning, 10 (4), 16 - 18.
Wheeler, S. (2002). User reactions to video-conferencing: Which students cope best?. Education Media International, 37, 31 - 38.
Yocom, D. J., & Whitson, D. (1995). Compressed video delivery of a coaching/mentoring modul for teacher/education Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 23 (3), 265-275.
Yu, B., Kim, K. & Roh, S. (2001). A user analysis for web-based distance education. Proceedings of The annual topics on distance learning conference, USA. [Online]. Retrieved on 13 April 2004. Available from http://www.calumet.purdue.edu/todl/proceedings

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com