Buradasınız

Mathematical Expressions for Estimation of Errors in the Formulas which are used to obtaining intermediate values of Biological Activity in QSAR

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) attempts to find consistent relationships between the variations in the values of molecular properties and the biological activity for a series of compounds. These physicochemical descriptors, which include parameters to account for hydrophobicity, topology, electronic properties, and steric effects, are determined empirically or, more recently, by computational methods. Quantitative structure -activity relationships (QSAR) generally take the form of a linear equation where the biological activity is dependent variable. Biological activity is depended on the parameters and the coefficients. Parameters are computed for each molecule in the series. Coefficients are calculated by fitting variations in the parameters. Intermediate values of the biological activity are obtained by some formulas. These formulas are worked in tabulated values of biological activity in Quantitative structure - activity relationships. These formulas are worked in the conditions and all conditions are based on the position of the point lies in the table. Derived formulas using Newton’s method for interpolation are worked in conditions which are depending on the point lies. If the point lies in the upper half then used Newton’s forward interpolation formula. If the point lies in the lower half then we used Newton’s backward interpolation formula. And when the interval is not equally spaced then used Newton’s divide difference interpolation formula. When the tabulated values of the function are not equidistant then used Lagrangian polynomial. Mathematical expressions are derived for estimation of errors using intermediate values and formulas.
272-279

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Nizam Uddin, “Formulas for Obtaining Intermediate Values of Biological Activity in QSAR using Lagrangian polynomial
and Newton’s method”, Science Insights: An International Journal, 2(4), 21-23, 2012.
[2] John G. Topliss, “Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Drugs,” Academic Press, New York, 1983.
[3] Franke, R., “Theoretical Drug Design Methods,” Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984.
[4] Robert F. Gould (ed.), “Biological Correlations -- The Hansch Approach,” Advances in Chemistry Series, No. 114,
American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1972.
[5] Hansch, C., Leo, A., and Taft, R.W., “A Survey of Hammett Substituent Constants and Resonance and Field
Parameters,” Chem. Rev., 91: 165-195, 1991.
[6] Nizam Uddin, “Interpolate the Rate of Enzymatic Reaction: Temperature, Substrate Concentration and Enzyme
Concentration based Formulas using Newton’s Method”, International Journal of Research in Biochemistry and
Biophysics, 2(2), 5-9, 2012.
[7] Nizam Uddin, “Estimation of Errors: Mathematical Expressions of Temperature, Substrate Concentration and Enzyme
Concentration based Formulas for obtaining intermediate values of the Rate of Enzymatic Reaction,” International
Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 153–172, 2013.
[8] Nizam Uddin, “Enzyme Concentration, Substrate Concentration and Temperature based Formulas for obtaining
intermediate values of the rate of enzymatic reaction using Lagrangian polynomial,” International Journal of Basic
And Applied Sciences, 1(3), 299-302, 2012.
[9] Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (Eds.). “Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and
Mathematical Tables,” 9th printing. New York: Dover, p. 880, 1972.
[10] Beyer, W. H., “CRC Standard Mathematical Tables,” 28th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, p. 432, 1987.
[11] Graham, R. L.; Knuth, D. E., and Patashnik, O., “Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science,” 2nd ed.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994.
[12] Jordan, C., “Calculus of Finite Differences,” 3rd ed. New York: Chelsea, 1965.
[13] Nörlund, N. E., “Vorlesungen über Differenzenrechnung,” New York: Chelsea, 1954.
[14] Riordan, J., “An Introduction to Combinatorial Analysis,” New York: Wiley, 1980.
[15] Whittaker, E. T. and Robinson, G., “The Gregory-Newton Formula of Interpolation” and “An Alternative Form of the
Gregory-Newton Formula.” §8-9 in The Calculus of Observations: A Treatise on Numerical Mathematics, 4th ed. New
York: Dover, pp. 10-15, 1967.
[16] Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (Eds.), “Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and
Mathematical Tables,” 9th printing. New York: Dover, p. 880, 1972.
[17] Hildebrand, F. B., “Introduction to Numerical Analysis,” New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 43-44 and 62-63, 1956.
[18] Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (Eds.), “Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and
Mathematical Tables,” 9th printing. New York: Dover, pp. 878-879 and 883, 1972.
[19] Beyer, W. H. (Ed.)., “CRC Standard Mathematical Tables,” 28th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, p. 439, 1987.
[20] Jeffreys, H. and Jeffreys, B. S. “Lagrange's Interpolation Formula.” §9.011 in Methods of Mathematical Physics, 3rd
ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, p. 260, 1988.
[21] Pearson, K. Tracts for Computers 2, 1920.
[22] Anton, H. “Rolle's Theorem, Mean Value Theorem.” §4.9 in Calculus: A New Horizon, 6th ed. New York: Wiley,
pp. 260-266, 1999.
[23] Apostol, T. M. Calculus, “One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra,” 2nd ed. Waltham, MA:
Blaisdell, Vol. 1, p. 184, 1967.
[24] Dehn, M. and Hellinger, D., “Certain Mathematical Achievements of James Gregory,” Amer. Math. Monthly 50, 149-
163, 1943.
[25] Jeffreys, H. and Jeffreys, B. S., “Taylor's Theorem,” §1.133 in Methods of Mathematical Physics, 3rd ed. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 50-51, 1988.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com