Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

BİR SAVUNMA SANAYİ FİRMASINDA ÇOK KRİTERLİ ALT YÜKLENİCİ SEÇİM PROBLEMİ VE ÇÖZÜMÜ

MULTI CRITERIA SUBCONTRACTOR SELECTION PROBLEM AND ITS SOLUTION FOR A DEFENCE INDUSTRY FIRM

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aims to solve the problem of selecting and evaluating a subcontractor firm for a company that performs research and development activities in defense industry. Subcontractoring means that part of the work is transferred from another company that has special skills or resources that allow it to perform tasks clearly specified in better conditions. During the selection process, considering multiple criteria such as technical requirements of the work, experience of the suncontractor firm, warranty conditions, delivery time, as well as costs is crucial to obtain a realistic and implementable solution. In this study, the solution of the problem is gathered by utilizing the integration of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Promethee II method which are multi-criteria decision making methods. Decision Maker’s criteria weights are determined by AHP. The ranking of alternatives are obtained Promethee II. The evaluation of the selected alternative on the basis of each criterion is utilized which provides feedback to impove the subcontractor firm. Weight Stability Interval Analysis is performed to investigate impacts of the changes in the weights of criteria determined by AHP on the ranking. As a result, this study provides the most efective selection and evaluation of a subcontractor which is critically important for a national defense research & development project.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, savunma sanayi sektöründe ARGE çalışmaları gerçekleştiren bir firmanın, yatırımlarında birlikte çalışacağı alt yüklenici firmayı seçim ve değerlendirme problemine çözüm getirilmesi hedeflenmiştir. Alt yüklenicilik, bir işin bir parçasının önceden belirlenen şartlara uygun olarak, özel yeteneklerini ve kaynaklarını kullanarak daha iyi yapabilecek bir başka firmadan transfer edilmesidir. Alt yüklenici seçim probleminde, maliyetin yanı sıra; teknik gereksinimler, deneyim, garanti süresi, teslim zamanı gibi birden çok kriterin dikkate alınması, elde edilecek çözümün gerçekçi ve uygulanabilir olması açısından zaruri öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışmada problemin çözümü, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses (AHP) ve Promethee II yöntemlerinin bütünleşik kullanımı ile elde edilmiştir. Karar verici için uygun kriter ağırlıkları AHP ile belirlenmiş ve alternatif alt yüklenicilerin en iyiden en kötüye doğru sıralaması Promethee II ile elde edilmiştir. Aynı zamanda seçilen alternatifin her bir kriter bazında değerlendirilmesi yapılarak firmanın alt yüklenici firma için geri besleme yapabileceği bilgiler elde edilmiştir. AHP yöntemi ile elde edilen kriter ağırlıklarındaki değişimin sıralamaya etkilerini araştırmak amacıyla duyarlılık analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma ile bir milli savunma bir projesinin gerçekleştirilmesinde ve yürütülmesinde kritik öneme sahip alt yüklenicinin en etkin şekilde seçimi ve değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-bir-savunma-sanayi-firmasinda-cok-kriterli-alt-yuklenici-secim-problemi-cozumu.pdf
  • 4
645
654
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Dolgui, A. ve Proth, J.M., “Outsourcing:
definitions and analysis”, International Journal
of Production Research, Cilt 51, No 23–24,
6769–6777, 2013.
2. Kumaraswamy, M.M. ve Matthews, J.D.,
“Improved Subcontractor Selection Employing
Partnering Principles”, Journal Of Management
in Engineering, Cilt 16 No 3, 47-57, 2000.
3. El-Mashaleh, M.S., “A Construction Subcontractor
Selection Model”, Jordan Journal of Civil
Engineering, Cilt 3, No 4, 375-383, 2009.
4. Ulubeyli, S., Manisalı, E., Kazaz, A.,
“Subcontractor Selection Practices In
International Construction Projects”, Journal Of
Civil Engineering and Management, Cilt 16,
No 1, 47-56, 2010.
5. Can, Ş., “Bir Savunma Sanayi Firmasında Çok
Kriterli Alt Yüklenici Seçim Problemi Ve
Çözümü”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi
Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2012.
6. Rahman, M.M., Kumaraswamy, M.M.,
“Relational Selection for Collaborative Working
Arrangements”, Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, Cilt 131, No 10,
1087-1098, 2005.
7. Hartmann, A., Ling, F.Y.Y., Tan, J.S.H.,
“Relative Importance of Subcontractor Selection
Criteria: Evidence from Singapore”, Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management,
Cilt 135, No 9, 826-832, 2009.
8. Park, S.H., “Whole Life Performance
Assessment: Critical Success Factors”, Journal
of Construction Engineering and
Management, Cilt 135, No 11, 1146-1161, 2009.
9. Perng, Y.H., Chen, S.J., Lu, H.J., “Potential
Benefits for Collaborating Formwork
Subcontractors Based on Co-Operative Game
Theory”, Building and Environment, Cilt 40,
No 2, 239-244, 2005.
10. Ko, C.H., Cheng, M.Y., Wu, T.K., “Evaluating
Sub-Contractor Performance Using EFNIM”,
Automation in Construction, Cilt 16, No 4,
525-530, 2007.
11. Assmann, D., Punter, T., “Towards Partnership in
Software Subcontracting”, Computers in
Industry, Cilt 54, No 2, 137-150, 2004.
12. Tatsiopoulos, I.P., Ponis, S.T., Hadzilias, E.A.,
Panayiotou, N.A., “Realization of The Virtual
Enterprise Paradigm in The Clothing Industry
Through E-Business Technology”, Production
and Operations Management, Cilt 11, No 4,
516-530, 2002.
13. Ünsal, H. I. ve Taylor, J. E., “Modeling Interfirm
Dependency: Game Theoretic Simulation to
Examine the Hodup Problem in Project
Networks”, Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, Cilt 137, No 4,
284-293, 2011.
14. Wang, D.W., Yung, K.L., Ip, W.H., “A Heuristic
Genetic Algorithm for Subcontractor Selection In
A Global Manufacturing Environment”, IEEE
Transactions On Systems Man and
Cybernetics Part C-Applications and Reviews,
Cilt 31, No 2, 189-198, 2001.
15. Salo, A. ve Punkka, A., “Rank Inclusion in
Criteria Hierarchies”, European Journal of
Operational Research, Cilt 163, No 2, 338-356,
2005. .
16. Lin, Y.H., Lee, P.C., Ting, H.I., “Dynamic Multi-
Attribute Desicion Making Model Grey Number
Ş. Can, F. Arıkan Bir Savunma Sanayi Firmasinda Çok Kriterli Alt Yüklenici Seçim Problemi …
654 Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. Cilt 29, No 4, 2014
Evaluations”, Expert Systems with
Applications, Cilt 35, No 4, 1638-1644, 2008a.
17. Lin, Y.H., Lee, P.C., Chang, T.P., Ting, H.I.,
“Multi-Attribute Group Desicion Making Under
The Condition of Uncertain Information”,
Automation in Construction, Cilt 17, No 6,
792-797, 2008b.
18. Radziszewska-Zielina, E., “Methods for Selecting
The Best Partner Construction Enterprise in
Terms of Partnering Relations”, Journal of Civil
Engineering, Cilt 16, No 4, 510-520, 2010.
19. Hwang, C.L. ve Yoon, K., Multi Attribute
Decision Making Methods and Applications A
State of The Art Survey, Springer-Verlag, New
York, 253, 1981.
20. Tabucanon, M. T., Multiple Criteria Decision
Making In Industry, 2nd Edition, Elsevier, New
York, 12-107, 1988.
21. Hwang, C.L. ve Lin, M.J., Group Decision
Making Under Multiple Criteria : Methods
and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York,
1987.
22. Brans, J.P. ve Vincke, P., “A Preference Ranking
Organizastion Method: The PROMETHEE
Method For MCDM”, Management Science,
Cilt 31, No 3, 647-656, 1985.
23. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Multiple
Criteria Decision Analysis: State Of The Art
Surveys: Edited Book, Springer, Boston USA,
2005.
24. Macharis C., Springael J., De Brucker K.,
Verbeke A., PROMETHEE and AHP: The design
of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis-
Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP,
European Journal of Operational Research,
Cilt 153, 307–317, 2004.
25. Wang, J.J., Yang, D.L., “ Using a hybrid multicriteria
decision aid methodfor information
systems outsourcing”, Computers & Operations
Research, Cilt 34, 3691–3700, 2007.
26. Dağdeviren, M., “Decision Making In Equipment
Selection: An Integrated Approach With AHP
and PROMETHEE”, Journal of Intelligent
Manufacturing, Cilt 4 No 2, 397- 406, 2008.
27. Caliskan, H; Kursuncu, B; Kurbanoglu, C, Güven
Ş.Y., “Material selection for the tool holder
working under hard milling conditions using
different multi criteria decision making methods”
Materials & Design, Cilt 45, 473-479, 2013.
28. Akincilar, A., Dagdeviren, M., “A hybrid multicriteria
decision making model to evaluate hotel
websites” International Journal Of Hospitality
Management, Cilt 36, 263-271, 2014.
29. Saaty T., The analytic hierarchy process,
McGraw-Hill International Book Company,
USA, 1980.
30. Brans J.P., Vincke, B.H., Mareschal, B., “How to
select and how to rank projects: the Promethee
method”, European Journal of Operational
Research, 24, 228–38, 1986.
31. Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R.B., Albadvi, A.,
Aghdasi, M., “Promethee: A comprehensive
literature review on methodologies and
applications”, European Journal of Operations
Research, Cilt 200, No 4, 198-215, 2010.
32. Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., “PROMETHEE
Sıralama Yöntemi İle Tedarikçi Seçimi”, Journal
of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture
of Gazi University, Cilt 21, No 2, 48-52, 2007.
33. Belair, D., Eagan, M., “Engineering Off-The-
Shelf Solutions: A Life Cycle View”, Naval
Engineering Journal, Cilt 108, No 3, 181-190,
1996.
34. Wolters, W.T.M., Mareschal, B., “Novel types of
sensitivity analysis for additive MCDM
methods”, European Journal of Operational
Research, Cilt 81, No 2, 281–290, 1995.
35.Mareschal, B., “Weight stability intervals in multicriteria
decision aid”, European Journal of
Operational Research, Cilt 33, No 1, 54–64,
1988.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com