Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Eğitim Fakültesi Öğretim Elemanlarının BT Yeterlilikleri, Kullanımlarıve Algıları

Teacher Educators’ ICT Competencies, Usage, and Perceptions

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study presents survey findings about teacher educators’ perceptions about ICT integration into teacher education programs, their perceived ICT competencies and their ICT usage in their courses. The data were collected through a questionnaire from 111 teacher educators in 18 schools of teacher education (STE) and through interview with 6 teacher educators in 3 STE. The results indicated that most of the participants expressed positive perceptions about the integration of ICT into teacher education programs. Generally, their ICT competency was completely sufficient. They use the Internet as a supportive tool to their courses, and particularly search engines used by them.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma; eğitim fakültesi öğretim elemanlarının Bilişim Teknolojilerinin (BT) eğitim fakültelerine bütünleştirilmesi konusundaki algılarını, BT konusundaki yeterliliklerini ve BT’yi derslerinde ne şekilde kullandıklarınıincelemektedir. Veriler; 18 eğitim fakültesindeki 111 öğretim elemanından anketler yoluyla, 3 eğitim fakültesindeki 6 öğretim elemanından da görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar göstermektedir ki, çalışmaya katılanların büyük bir kısmının BT’nin eğitim fakültelerine bütünleştirilmesi konusundaki algılarıolumludur. Sonuçlar, çalışmaya katılanların BT konusunda gerekli yeterliliklere sahip olduklarınıgöstermektedir. İnternet’i derslerine destek amaçlıolarak kullanan öğretim elemanlarının, en fazla da arama motorlarından yararlandıklarıgörülmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-egitim-fakultesi-ogretim-elemanlarinin-bt-yeterlilikleri-kullanimlarive-algilari.pdf
  • 1
109-125
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bai, H., & Ertmer, P. (2006). Teacher educators’ beliefs and technology uses in relation
to preservice teachers’ beliefs and technology attitudes. In M. Simonson & M.
Crawford (Eds.), 29
th
Annual Proceedings Volume #2 on the Practice of
Educational Communications and Technology(pp.73-80). Dallas, TX: AECT.
Baron, L. C., & Goldman, E. S. (1994). Integrating technology with teacher preparation.
In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform(pp. 81-110). SF: Jossey-Bass Publ.
Göktaş, Y. (2006). The current status of information and communication technologies
integration into schools of teacher education and K-12 in Turkey. Unpublished
PhD. Thesis, METU, Ankara, Turkey.
Goktas, Y., Yildirim, Z., & Yildirim, S. (2008). A Review of ICT related courses in
preservice teacher education programs. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(2), 81-92.
Glenn, A.D. (2002). Emergence of technology standards for preservice teacher
education.North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, NCREL’s Educational
Technology. (2005, December 20)
Gülbahar, Y. (2008). ICT usage in higher education: A case study on preservice
teachers and instructors. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 7
(1).
HEC. (1998). Egitim fakulteleri ogretmen yetistirme programlarinin yeniden
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 29, Sayı1 (2009) 109-125 124
duzenlenmesi. Ankara: T.C. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Baskanligi.
Imer, G. (2000). Egitim fakultelerinde ogretmen adaylarinin bilgisayara ve bilgisayari
egitimde kullanmaya yonelik nitelikleri.Eskisehir: Anadolu University
Publications.
Kariuki, M., Franklin, T., & Duran, M. (2001). A technology partnership: lessons
learned by mentors. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (3), 407-417.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). An expendad sourcebook: Qualitative data
analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
NVIGM. (2006). Nufus istatistikleri: Isim istatistikleri.
(2006,
March 17)
Odabasi, H. F. (2000). Faculty use oftechnological resources in Turkey. Innovations in
Education and Training International, 37(2), 103-107.
Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use
computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in
Education, 31(4), 402-417.
Rosenfeld, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (2005). Promoting classroom technology use. The
Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(2), 145–153.
SEIRTEC. (1998). Technology and preservice teacher education program survey.
(2005, February 5)
Turkmen, H. (2006). Exploring Turkish science education faculties’ understanding of
educational technology and use. International Journal of Education and
Development using ICT [Online],2(2). (2006, August
10)
Vannatta, R. A., & O’Bannon, B. (2002). Beginning to put the pieces together: A
technology infusion model for teacher education. Journal of Computing in
Teacher Education, 18(4), 112-123.
Willis, E. M., & Tucker, G. R. (2001). Using constructionism to teach
constructivism: Modeling hands-on technology integration in a preservice
teacher technology course. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education,17(2),
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 29, Sayı1 (2009) 109-125 125
4-37.
Yildirim, S. (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and
inservice teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of
Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 479- 495.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com