Buradasınız

BİYOLOJİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ “BAĞIŞIKLIK” KONUSUNDAKİ BİLİŞSEL YAPILARI

Biology Student Teachers’ Cognitive Structure on the Concept of “Immunity”

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The current study aims to determine biology student teachers’ cognitive structure on the concept of immunity. Qualitative research method was applied in this study. The data were collected from 40 biology student teachers. The free word-association test and the drawing-writing technique were used as data collection instruments. The data collected were subject to content analysis. Based on the categories, frequency was provided. The data collected through the study were divided into 8 categories, which were stated as follows: structures are involved in immunity, artificial immunity, the response of immunity, the definition of immunity, the organism response of end of the immunity, relationship between immunity and species, the nature of immunity and ways to destroy in the immunity. Moreover, it was determined that they had some alternative concepts about immunity.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının bağışıklıkla ilgili kavramsal çatılarını belirleyerek bilişsel yapılarını tespit etmektir. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Toplam 40 biyoloji öğretmen adayının katılımıyla hazırlanmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında bağımsız kelime ilişkilendirme testi ve çizme-yazma tekniği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler içerik analizine göre analiz edilerek, kategoriler frekans değerlerine göre verilmiştir. Araştırma verileri toplam 8 kategori altında toplanmıştır: bunlar bağışıklıkta rol alan yapılar, yapay bağışıklık, bağışıklığın cevabı, bağışıklığın tanımı, bağışıklık sonucunda organizmanın verdiği tepkiler, bağışıklık tür ilişkisi, bağışıklığın doğası ve bağışıklıkta rol alan yok etme yollarıdır. Ayrıca bağışıklıkla ilgili bazı alternatif kavramlara sahip oldukları da belirlenmiştir.
242
264

REFERENCES

References: 

Ad, V.N.K. ve Demirci, N. (2012). Prospective Teachers’ Levels of Associating Environmental
Problems with Science Fields and Thermodynamics Laws. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi
Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (3), 19-46
Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen Öğrenimi ve Öğretimi. Ankara: Asil Yayınevi.
Aydın, F. ve Taşar, M.F. (2010). An Investigation of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Cognitive
Structures and Ideas about the Nature of Technology. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir
Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(4), 209-221.
Backett-Milburn, K. & McKie, L. (1999). A Critical Appraisal of the Draw and Write
Technique. Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 14 (3), 387–398.
Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H. & Hansell, M. H. (1999a). Revisiting Learning Difficulties in
Biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 84–86.
Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H. & Sutcliffe, R.G. (1999b). Investigation of Students’ Cognitive
Structure in Elementary Genetics through Word Association Tests. Journal of Biological
Education, 33, 134-141.
Bahar, M. ve Kılıçlı, F. (2001).Kelime İlişkilendirme Testi Yöntemi ile Atatürk İlkeleri
Arasındaki Bağların Araştırılması. X. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi. Abant İzzet
Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
Bahar, M. (2003). Biyoloji Eğitiminde Kavram Yanılgıları ve Kavram Değişim Stratejileri.
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 3 (1), 27- 64.
Bahar, M. ve Özatlı, N.S. (2003). Kelime İletişim Test Yöntemi İle Lise 1. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin
Canlıların Temel Bileşenleri Konusundaki Bilişsel Yapılarının Araştırılması. Balıkesir
Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5 (1), 75- 85.
Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Durmuş, S. ve Bıçak, B. (2006). Geleneksel ve Alternatif Ölçme ve
Değerlendirme Öğretmen El-Kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Bahar, M., Özel, M., Prokop, P. & Uşak, M. (2008). Science Student Teachers’ Ideas of the
Heart. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2), 1648 -3898.
Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi 262 Dergisi, 21 (2013) 242-264
Cardellini, L. & Bahar, M. (2000). Monitoring the Learning of Chemistry through Word
Association Tests. Australian Chemistry Research Book, 19, 59- 69.
Cetin, G., Ozarslan, M., Isik, E. & Eser, H. (2013). Students’ views About Health Concept by
Drawing and Writing Technique. Energy Education Science and Technology, Part B, 5
(1), 597-606.
CUSE (Committee on Undergraduate Science Education) (1997). Misconceptions as Barriers to
Understanding Science. Science Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook. Washington, D.
C.: National Academy Press.
Çiftçi, S. (2009). Kelime Çağrışımlarının Cinsiyet Değişkenine Göre Gösterdiği Temel
Nitelikler Üzerine Bir Deneme. Turkish Studies, 4 (3), 633-654.
Çimer, A. (2012). What Makes Biology Learning Difficult and Effective: Students’ Views?
Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71.
Daskolia, M., Flogaitis, E. & Papageorgiou, E. (2006). Kindergarten Teachers' Conceptual
Framework on the Ozone Layer Depletion. Exploring the Associative Meanings of a
Global Environmental Issue. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 168-
178.
De Souza-Hart, J. (2011). Creative Ideas for Biology Podcasts: The Immune System as an
Example. The American Biology Teacher, 73 (3), 171-175.
Donovan, M. S. & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom.
National Academies Press.
Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A. & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a Hydrological Concept Though
Children’s Drawings.International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485-497.
Enginar, İ., Saka, A. ve Sesli, E. (2002). Lise 2 Öğrencilerinin Biyoloji Dersinde Kazandıkları
Bilgileri Güncel Olaylarla İlişkilendirebilme Düzeyleri. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve
Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara.
Ercan, F., Taşdere, A. ve Ercan, N. (2010). Kelime Ilişkilendirme Testi Aracılığıyla Bilişsel
Yapının ve Kavramsal Değişimin Gözlenmesi. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7 (2), 136-154.
Gellin, B., Maibach, E. & Marcuse, E. (2000). Do Parents Understand Immunizations? A
National Telephone Survey. Pediatrics, 106 (5), 1097-1102.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. & Rutherford, M. (1998a). Models in Explanations, part 1, Horses for
courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 83-97.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. & Rutherford, M. (1998b). Models in Explanations, part 2, Whose
voice? Whose ears? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 187–203.
Gilbert, J. K. & Boulter, C. J. (1998) Learning Science through Models and Modeling. In K
Tobin and B Frazer (Eds). The International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 53-
66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gussarsky, E. & Gorodetsky, M. (1990). On the Concept “Chemical Equilibrium: The
Associative Framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (3), 197-204.
Hovardas, T. & Korfiatis, K.J. (2006). Word Associations as a Tool for Assessing Conceptual
Change in Science Education. Learning and Instruction, 16, 416-432.
Hruschka, D.J., Schwartz, D., St.John, D.C., Picone-Decaro, E., Jenkins, R.A. & Carey, J.W.
(2004). Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral
Research. Field Methods, 16 (3), 307-331.
Işıklı, M., Taşdere, A. ve Göz, N. L. (2011). Kelime İlişkilendirme Testi Aracılığıyla Öğretmen
Adaylarının Atatürk İlkelerine Yönelik Bilişsel Yapılarının İncelenmesi. Uşak
Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (1), 50–72.
Jones, M. G. & Rua, M. J. (2006). Conceptual Representations of Flu and Microbial Illness Held
by Students, Teachers, and Medical Professionals. School Science and Mathematics, 108
(6), 263-278.
Jones, M.G. & Rua, M.J. (2008). Conceptual representations of flu and microbial illness held by
students, teachers, and medical professionals. School Science and Mathematics, 108 (6),
263–278.
Jones, G., Gardner, G. E., Lee, T., Poland, K. & Robert, S. (2012).The Impact of Microbiology
Instruction on Students’ Perceptions of Risks Related to Microbial Illness. International
Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2012, 1–15
H.Kurt / Biyoloji Öğretmen Adaylarının “Bağışıklık” Konusundaki Bilişsel… 263
Kostova, Z. & Radoynovska, B. (2008). Word Association Test for Studying Conceptual
Structures of Teachers and Students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education
Policy, 2 (2), 209-231.
Kostova, Z. & Radoynovska, B. (2010). Motivating Students’ Learning Using Word Association
Test and Concept Maps. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 4 (1), 62-
98.
Köseoğlu, F. ve Bayır, E. (2011). Examining Cognitive Structures of Chemistry Teacher
Candidates about Gravimetric Analysis through Word Association Test Method. Trakya
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 107-125.
Kurt, H., Kaya, B., Ateş, A. ve Kılıç, S. (2009). Biyoloji Öğretmen Adaylarının Biyolojik
Okuryazarlığı. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 17 -
30.
Lazarowitz, R. & Penso, S. (1992). High School Students’ Difficulties in Learning Biology
Concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 215-224.
Lukin, K. (2013). Exciting Middle and High School Students about Immunology: An Easy,
Inquiry-Based Lesson. Immunologic Research, 55(1-3), 201-209.
Martin, E. (1992). The End of the Body? American Ethnologist, 19, 121-141.
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
Mosothwane, M. (2009).A Study of Science Teacher Trainees’ Conceptualization of
Immunological Processes. International Journal of Educational Policies, 3(1), 67-80.
Nakiboğlu, C. (2008).Using Word Associations for Assessing Nonmajor Science Students’
Knowledge Structure Before and After General Chemistry Instructions: The Case of
Atomic Structure. Chemical Educational Research Practice, 9, 309–322.
Nartgün, Z. (2006). Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretiminde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. M. Bahar (Edt.).
Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretimi. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
Nyachwayaa, J. M., Mohameda, A-R., Roehriga, G. H. Woodb, N. B., Kernc, A. L. &
Schneiderd, J.L. (2011). The Development of an Open-Ended Drawing Tool: An
Alternative Diagnostic Tool for Assessing Students’ Understanding of the Particulate
Nature of Matter. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12 (2), 121-132.
Özatlı, N. S. ve Bahar, M. (2010).Öğrencilerin Boşaltım Sistemi Konusundaki Bilişsel
Yapılarının Yeni Teknikler İle Ortaya Konulması. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi
Dergisi, 10 (2), 9-26.
Özmen, H. (2003). Kimya Öğretmen Adaylarının Asit ve Baz Kavramlarıyla İlgili İlgilerini
Günlük Olaylarla İlişkilendirebilme Düzeyleri.Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 11 (2), 317-
324.
Palmer, D. H. (1999) Exploring the Link between Students’ Scientific and Nonscientific
Conceptions. Science Education, 83, 639-653.
Pluhar, Z. F., Piko, B. F., Kovacs, S. & Uzzoli, A. (2009). Air Pollution is bad for My Health:
Hungarian Children’s Knowledge of the Role of Environment in Health and Disease.
Health & Place, 15, 239-246.
Pines, A. & West, L. (1986). Conceptual Understanding and Science Learning: An
Interpretation of Research within Sources-of Knowledge Framework. Science
Education, 70 (5), 583-604.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P. & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific
Conception. Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
Pridmore, P. & Bendelow, G. (1995). Images of Health: Exploring Beliefs of Children Using the
‘Draw-And-Write’ Technique. Health Education Journal, 54 (4), 473–88.
Prokop, P., Fancovicová, J. & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2009). The Effect of Type of Instruction on
Expression of Children’s Knowledge: How Do Children See the Endocrine and Urinary
System? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4 (1), 75-93.
Rennie, L. J. & Jarvis, T. (1995). English and Australian Children’s Perceptions about
Technology. Research Science Technology Education, 13(1), 37-52.
Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi 264 Dergisi, 21 (2013) 242-264
Romine, W., Siegel, M. & Roberts, T. (2009, April). Analyzing Secondary Science Teachers’
Alternative Conceptions Related to Avian Influenza. Paper Presentation at the National
Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting, Garden Grove, CA.
Sato, M. & James, P. (1999). "Nature" and "Environment" as Perceived by University Students
and Their Supervisors. International Journal of Environmental Education and
Information, 18 (2), 165-172.
Seymour, J. & Longdon, B. (1991). Respiration-That's Breathing Isn't It? Journal of Biological
Education, 23(3), 177-184.
Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M. & Harbor, J. (2007). Students’ Mental Models of the
Environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (2), 327–348.
Simonneaux, L. (2000). A Study of Pupils’ Conceptions and Reasoning in Connection With
‘Microbes’ As a Contribution to Research in Biotechnology Education. International
Journal of Science Education, 22 (6), 619–644.
Stafstrom, C, E., Rostasy, K. & Minster, A. (2002). The Usefulness of Children's Drawings in
the Diagnosis of Headache. Pediatrics, 109 (3), 460-472.
Taşçı, G. ve Soran, H. (2012).Yükseköğretim Biyoloji Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stratejileri ve
Bilişsel Yapılarının İncelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42,
394-405.
Taşdemir, A. ve Demirbaş, M. (2010). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Fen ve Teknoloji Dersinde
Gördükleri Konulardaki Kavramları Günlük Yaşamla İlişkilendirebilme Düzeyleri.
Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1),125-148.
Timur, B. & Taşar, M.F. (2011). Developing Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Cognitive
Structures about Technology: Word Association Test (WAT). Western Anatolia Journal
of Educational Sciences, 2011, 131-138.
Torkar, G. & Bajd, B. (2006).Trainee Teachers’ Ideas about Endangered Birds. Journal of
Biological Education, 41(1), 5-8.
Tsai, C. C. & Huang, C. M. (2002).Exploring Students’ Cognitive Structures in Learning
Science: A Review of Relevant Methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 163-169.
Vance, K., Miller, K. & Hand, B. (1995). Two Examples of Using Constructivist Approaches to
Teach Ecology at the Middle School Level. The American Biology Teacher, 37 (4), 244-
249.
Wandersee J. H., Mintzes J. J. & Novak J.D. (1994). Research on Alternative Conceptions in
Science. In: Gabel DL (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning
(pp. 177-210). Simon & Schuster and Prentice Hall International, New York.
White, R. T. & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing Understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
Yayla, R. G. ve Eyceyurt, G. (2011). Mental Models of Pre-Service Science Teachers about
Basic Concepts in Chemistry. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 2011,
285-294.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2000). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yiğit, N., Devecioğlu, Y. ve Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2002) İlköğretim Fen Bilgisi Öğrencilerinin Fen
Kavramlarını Günlük Yaşamdaki Olgu ve Olaylarla İlişkilendirme Düzeyleri. V. Ulusal
Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara.
Yip, D. Y. (1998). Identification of Misconceptions in Novice Biology Teachers and Remedial
Strategies for Improving Biology Learning. International Journal of Science Education,
20 (4), 461-477.
Yorek, N., Sahin, M. & Ugulu, I. (2010). Students’ Representations of the Cell Concept from 6
to 11 Grades: Persistence of the “Fried-Egg Model”. International Journal of Physical
Sciences, 5 (1), 15-24.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com