Buradasınız

Ekonomik Büyüme ve Demokratikleşme Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi: Ampirik Bir Uygulama (Türkiye Örneği)

An Analysis of Relation Between Economic Growth and Democratization: An Empiric Application (A Sample of Turkey)

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de demokratikleşme ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nasıl bir ilişki olduğunu incelemektir. Bu amaç çerçevesinde öncelikle literatürde yapılmış olan çalışmalar titizlikle irdelenmiştir. Türkiye için eşbütünleşme analizi ve granger nedensellik testlerinin uygulandığı ekonometrik bir çalışma yapılmış ve bu uygulamada sivil hak ve özgürlükler, politik özgürlükler ve nüfus artışı bağımsız değişken, ekonomik büyümeyi temsil eden GSYİH büyüme hızı ise bağımlı değişken olarak modelde yer almıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda sivil haklar, nüfus büyüme hızı, politik özgürlükler ve ekonomik büyüme arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca sivil haklar ve politik özgürlüklerden ekonomik büyümeye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisinin olduğu gözlenmiştir.
Abstract (Original Language): 
The aim of this study is to analyze the relation between democratization and economic growth in Turkey, using time series data from 1980 to 2006. In the scope of this aim, an econometric application was held by using co-integration analyses and causality test in which the civil rights and liberties, politic liberties, and growth of population are added the model as an independent variables, and Gross Domestic Production (GDP) as a dependent variable. Results show that there is a long run relationship between civil rights liberties, political liberties, population growth rate and GDP growth rate. It is also found out that there is a unidirectional causality from civil rights and political liberties to GDP growth rate.
123
132

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

ALESINA, A., Özler, S., Roubini, N., Swagel, P. (1996), “Political Instability and Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 189-211.
ARAT, Z. F. (1988), “Democracy and Economic Development: Modernization Theory Revisite”, Comparative Politics, 21 (1), 21–36.
BARRO, ROBERT J. (1996), “Democracy and Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1 (1), 1-27.
BAŞAR, S ve Yıldız, Ş. (2009), “The Effects of Economic Growth on Democratization”, Balıkesir University SSE Journal, 12 (21).
BESLEY, T., S. Coate ve T.W. Guinnane (2004), “Incentives, Information, and Welfare: England’s New Poor Law and the Workhouse Test”, Edt. T.W. Guinnane, W.A. Sundstrom ve W.C. Whatley, in History Matters Essays on Economic Growth, Technology, and Demographic Change, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
BOIX, C., Stokes, S. C. (2003), “Endogenous Democratization”, World Politics, 55, 517-49.
BURKHART, R. E., Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1994), “Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis”, American Political Science Review, 88 (4), 903–10.
Civil Rights and Politic Liberties, http://www.freedomhouse.org/ template.cfm?page= 439 (05.01.2012).
COLARESI, M., Thompson, W. R. (2003), “The Economic Development – Democratization Relationship”, Coparative Political Studies, (36),4, 381–94.
COLEMAN, J. S. (1960), “Conclusion: The Political Systems of The Developing Area”, in Almond, G. A., Coleman, J. S., eds., The Politics of Developing Areas, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 532-81’den aktaran Arat, Z. F. (1988) “Democracy and Development: Modernization Theory Revisited”, Comparative Politics, Vol.21, No.1, 22.
CUTRIGHT, P. (1963), “National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis”, American Sociological Review, 28, 253–64.
ERRSON,S, and Jane-E. Lane (1996), “Democracy and Development: Statistical Exploration”, in A. Leftwich, Democracy and Development, 45-73.
GASIOROWSKI, M.J. (2000), “Democracy and Macroeconomic Performance in Underdeveloped Countries: An Empirical Analysis”, Comparative Political Studies, 33 (3), 59-75.
GHALI, B., vd, (2003), The Interaction Between Democracy and Development, UNESCO, Paris.
HELLIWELL, J. F. (1992), “Empirical Linkages Between Democracy and Economic Growth”, NBER Working Paper, No: 4066.
JACKMAN, R. W. (1973), “On the Relation of Economic Development to Democratic Performance”, American Journal of Political Science, 17 (3), 611–21.
KIM, C. L. (1971) “Socio-Economic Development and Political Democracy in Japanese Prefectures”, The American Political Science Review, 65 (1), 184–6.
LIPSET, S. M. (1959), “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy”, American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105.
LONDRAGEN, J. B., Poole, K. T. (1996) ,“Does High Income Promote Democracy”, World Politics, 49, 1-30.
MINIER, J.A. (1998), “Democracy and Growth: Alternative Approaches”, Journal of Economic Growth, 3 (2), 241–266.
MOHTADI, H. and Terry L. Roe (2003), “Democracy, Rent Seeking, Public Spending And Growth”, Journal of Public Economics, 87, 445-466.
MULLER, E. N. (1995), “Economic Determinants of Democracy”, American Sociological Review, 60 (6), 966–82.
NEUBAUER, D. E. (1967), “Some Conditions of Democracy”, The American Political Science Review, 6 (4), 2–9.
PERSSON, T. ve G. Tabellini (1994), “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence”, American Economic Review, 84 (3), 600–621.
PRZEWORKSI, A. and et al. (2002), Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990, Cambridge University Pres, 321.
E. Demirkan & M. V. Kaya / An Analysis of Relation Between Economic Growth and Democratization:
An Empiric Application (A Sample of Turkey)
132
TAVARES, J. ve R. Wacziarg (2001), “How Democracy Affects Growth”, European Economic Review, 45 (8), 1341–1378.
TÜİK, Population Statistics, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?tb_id=39&ust_id=11 (20.01.2012).
Turkish Ministry of Development, “Economic and Social Indicators, GNP Data”, http://www.dptgov.tr/PortalDesign/PortalControls/WebIcerikGosterim.aspx?... 83D5A6F F03 C 7B4FCA4781AFB16189036083F239D24768693A2F910AC7 6 4 FA886 (02.01.2012).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com