You are here

Home » Content

Katlı Öğretim Yönteminin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarı Puanları, Öğrenme Yaklaşımları ve Öğrenmenin Kalıcılığı Üzerindeki Etkisi

The Effect of Tiered Insruction on Students’ Achiviments, Learning Retainment

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aims to determine the effect of tiered instruction of differenciated instruction on students’ achiviements, learning approaches and learning retainment. The research was applied on the 5th grade students using pre, post and delayed test model. Both the experiment and the control group composed of 84 students. An academic achievement test was tested in terms of validity and reliability. The test was applied before, after and eight weeks later than the instruction.To determine the students’ approaches, Learning Approaches Inventory was applied. As a result of the research, in terms of academic achievement post-test and in terms of academic achievement delayed-test significant difference is detected in favor of the group on which Tiered techniques are applied. The third thypothesis was formulated to determine the differences between the experiment and the control group.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırma farklılaştırılmış öğretim yöntemlerinden Katlı Öğretim yönteminin uygulanmasının öğrencilerin akademik başarı puanları, öğrenme yaklaşımları ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığı değişkenleri üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeyi hedeflemiştir. Kontrol gruplu öntestsontest- tekrartest modeline göre gerçekleştirilen araştırma Beşiktaş Cumhuriyet İlköğretim Okulu 5.sınıf öğrencileri üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Deney ve kontrol grupları toplam 84 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada, geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışmaları yapılmış akademik başarı testi ve öğrenme yaklaşımı envanteri, uygulamadan önce, uygulamadan hemen sonra ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığını belirlemek amacıyla da akademik başarı iki ay sonra tekrar uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, “Katlı Öğretim ve geleneksel öğretim yöntemleri uygulanan öğrencilerin akademik başarı sontest puanları, kalıcılık testi puanları ve derin öğrenme puanları arasında anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-katli-ogretim-yonteminin-ogrencilerin-akademik-basari-puanlari-ogrenme-yaklasimlari-ogrenmenin-kaliciligi-uzerindeki-etkisi.pdf
  • 4
1589
1602
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, K., M. (2007). Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing school Failure,
51 (3), 49-54
Chen, Y.H. (2007). Exploring the assessment aspect of differentiated instruction: college EFL learners’
perspectives on tiered performance tasks. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,The University
of New Orleans.
Çoban, G., Ergin,Ö. (2008). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Feni Öğrenme Yaklaşımları. Uludağ Üniversitesi,
Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi XXI (2), 271-293
Daniels, H., Bizar, M. (1998). Methods that matter. Siz structures for best practice classrooms. York,
ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Dreeszen, J. L. (2009). The impact of differentiation on the critical thinking of gifted readers and
the evolving perspective of the fifth grade classroom teacher. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,
College of Education Kansas State Universiy. 09.02.2013 tarihinde http://krex.k-state.edu/
dspace/handle/2097/2063 internet sayfasından elde edilmiştir.
Erden, M., Altun, S. (2006). Öğrenme Stilleri. İstanbul:Morpa Kültür Yayınları.
Geisler, J. L, Hessler, T. Gardner,. Temple. S. (2009). Differentiated Writing İnterventions for High-Achieving
Urban African American Elementary Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20 (2), pp. 214-247.
Gregory, Gayle H, Carolyn Chapman. (2002). Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size
Doesn’t Fit All. ABD: Corwin Press, Inc.
Ham,J.A.(2001). The impact of differentiated instructional practices upon South Korean elementary
students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Bridgeport.
Heacox, Diane. (2002). Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom: How to Reach and
Teach All Learners, Grades 3-12. ABD: Free Spirit Publishing.
Kapusnick, R.A.,Hauslein, C.M. (2001). The silver cup of differentiated instruction. Kappa Delta
Pi Record, 37 (4), 156-159
Keck, S., Kinney, S. C. (2005). Creating a differentiated classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology,
33 (1), 12-15
McCartney, K. Scarr, S., Rocheleau, A. Philiphs, D., Abbout-Shim, M.,Keefe, N.Rosenthal,S.,
Ruh,J. (1997). Teacher-child interaction and chil-care auspices as predictors of social outcomes
in infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 43.
Morgil, İ.,Yılmaz, A.,Yörük, N. (2002). Fen Eğitimde İstasyonlarla İlgili Bir Uygulama. 17.03.2013
tarihinde http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek-5/ozetler/ internet sayfasından elde edilmiştir
Nunley, K.F. (2004). Layered curriculum: The practical solution for teachers with more than one
student in their classroom (2nd ed.)Kearney, NE:Morris
Oliva, P. F. (2005). Devoloping The Curriculum. 6. Basım. ABD: Pearson
Pierce, R.L., Adams, C.M. (2004). Tiered lessons: One way to differentiate mathematics instruction.
Gifted Child Today, 27(2), p58-65.
Richards M.R.E., Stuart N Omdal. (2007). Effects of Tiered Instruction on Academic Performance
in a Secondary Science Course. Journal of Advanced Academics. c. 18. s. 3: 424-456
Smutny,J.F.(2003).Differentated instruction. Phi Delta Kappa Fastbacks, 506,7-47
Katlı Öğretim Yönteminin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarı Puanları... 1601
September 2016 Vol:24 No:4 Kastamonu Education Journal
Sondergeld, T.A., Schultz R. (2008). Science, Standards, and Differentiation:It realy can be fun!.
Gifted child today. 31(1), 34-40.
Suarez D. (2007). Differentiation By Challange: Using a tiered program of instruction in mathmatics.
Making The difference: Differentitation in international schools. Eds: William Powel.
Ochan Kusuma Powel. Kuala Lumpur.
Stager, A. (2007). Differentiated Instruction in Mathematics. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Caldwell College.
Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal
for he Education of the Gifted, 29, 60-89
Tomlinson, C. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: One school’s journey
. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 77-87
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping A Route Toward Differentiated Instruction Educational Leadership,
37-1, 12-16
Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of AlL Learners.
ABD: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Tomlinson, C. A., McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by
Design. ABD: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Turville, J., Allen L., Nickelsen L. (2010). Differentiating by readiness: Strategies and lesson plans
for tiered instruction grades K-8. NY: Eye On Education Larchmont

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com