You are here

KİMLİK, KÜLTÜREL DEĞİŞİM ve DİN EĞİTİMİ

IDENTITY, CULTURAL CHANGE and RELIGIOUS EDUCATION

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article examines the religious education as contemporary problem and desciribes the effects of secularism and pluralism in religious education. In recent years, religious education, was badly affected due to wrong interpretation of secularism and pluralism by moving of the cultural elements. Religious education are ineffective in point of create a new identity and in making sense of the world. At this point for religious education been advised two new educational models concept that based on 'transfer of knowledge' and 'the transformation of knowledge'. The approach of transfer’s information basic concept of student-centered and in this approach teachers are location transmitting information only. In understanding the transformation of knowledge fundamental aspects of the learning process is teaching the content can be transferred either knowledge, skills, values and norms is not the issue but rather these elements is converted to an intuitive basis for the behavior. The cultural elements and religious experience has an essential place in reflect of both understanding to the religious education. The formation of personal identity in religious education should include encouraging the attitude of the student's criticism and evaluation. This process of identity formation of students not understand that they identified with the thought system of teachers. Religious education must be clear; should not be prim, coercive and should give students the possible opportunity to engage in creative experimentation. In this way, religious education will play an active and successful role in the formation of individual identity.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale, çağdaş bir problem olarak din eğitimini ele almakta, sekülarizm ve çoğulculuğun din eğitimine etkilerini konu edinmektedir. Son dönemlerde din eğitimi, sekülarizm ve kültürel unsurlardan hareketle çoğulculuğun yanlış yorumlanması sebebiyle olumsuz etkilendi. Yeni bir kimlik oluşturma ve dünyayı anlamlandırma noktasında din eğitimi etkisiz kalmaktadır. Bu noktada din eğitimi için ‘bilginin aktarılması’ ve ‘bilginin dönüştürülmesi’ anlayışını esas alan iki yeni eğitim modeli önerilebilir. Bilginin aktarılması anlayışı temelde öğrenci merkezli olup bu anlayışta öğretmen sadece bilgiyi aktarıcı konumdadır. Bilginin dönüştürülmesi anlayışında ise öğrenme sürecinin temel yönü, öğretilebilen içeriklerin aktarılması ya da bilgi, yetenekler, değerler ve normlar konusu olmayıp daha ziyade bu unsurların davranışta bulunmak için sezgisel bir temele dönüştürülmesidir. Her iki anlayışın din eğitimine yansıtılabilmesinde kültürün unsurları ve dini tecrübe vazgeçilmez bir yere sahiptir. Din eğitiminde kişisel kimliğin oluşumu, öğrencinin eleştirme-değerlendirme tutumunu teşvik etmeyi içermelidir. Öğrencilerdeki bu kimlik oluşum sürecini, öğretmenin düşünce sistemi ile özdeşleşmeleri biçiminde anlamamak gerekir. Din eğitimi açık olmalı; kuralcı, zorlayıcı olmamalı ve öğrencilere yaratıcı denemelerde bulunmaları için mümkün olan fırsatı vermelidir. Bu sayede din eğitimi bireylerde kimlik oluşumunda aktif ve başarılı bir şekilde rol oynayacaktır.
561
580

REFERENCES

References: 

COBB, Paul. Bowers, Janet. Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28 (2), 4-15.
DEWEY, John. (1980). Later works (ed. J. A. Boydston). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. LW9, 1-58.
DEWEY, John. (1980). The Quest for certainty. New York: Perigee Books.
DRONKERS, Jaap. (1996). Dutch public and religious schools between state and market. Beiheft: 51-66.
GERGEN, Keneth, J. (1985). The Social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist: 50, 266-275.
Kimlik, Kültürel Değişim ve Din Eğitimi
|579|
bilimname
düşünce platformu
XXX, 2016/1
GERGEN, Keneth, J. (1991). The Saturated self: dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
GÖTZ, Bernhard. (1970). John Dewey’s philosophie der erfahrung. John Dewey’s Philosophy of Experience. Dissertation: Üniversitat Tübingen.
GRIMMITT, Michael. (1987). Religious education and human development. Great Wakering: Mc Crimmons.
HERMANS., Hubert., & KEMPEN J. M.., & HARRY. J. G., & VAN Loon., & RENS. J. P. (1992). The Dialogical Self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist: 47, 23-33.
JACKSON, Philip, W. (1986). The Practice of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
JOAS, Hans. (1992). Die kreativitat des handelns. The Creativity of action. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
LAVE, Jean., & WENGER, Etienne. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MEAD, George, H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MIEDEMA, Siebren. (1995). The Beyond in the midst: The Relevance of Dewey’s philosophy of religion for education. in J Garrison (ed), The New Scholarship on Dewey. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 61-73.
MIEDEMA, Siebren. (1996). John Dewey and William James on religious experience. in C W Tolman, F Cherry, R van Hazewijk and I Lubek (eds), Problems of theoretical psychology. North York: Captus Press, 350-358.
MIEDEMA, Siebren. (1997). 'Institutionele en persoonlijke identiteit in pluralistisch perspectief [Institutional and Personal Identity from a Pluralistic Perspective] in C A M Hermans and J P A van Vugt (eds), Identiteit door de tijd [Identity across Time] (Den Haag/Nijmegen: ABKO/KSC), 150-168.
MIEDEMA, Siebren. (2002). James's metaphysics of experience and religious education. New York: Teachers College Press.
PENUEL, William, R., & WERTSCH, James, V., (1995). Vgotsky and identity formation: A Sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist. 30 (2), 83-92.
Willem L. WARDEKKER & Siebren MIEDEMA / Çev: Ramazan GÜREL
|580|
bilimname
düşünce platformu
XXX, 2016/1
THOMAS, Alexander. (1987). John Dewey’s theory of art. Experience and nature: The Horizons of feeling. Albany. NY: Suny Press.
WARDEKKER, Willem, L., & BIESTA, Gert, J. J., & MIEDEMA, Siebren. (1998). 'Heeft de school een pedagogische opdracht? [Does the School Have a Pedagogical Task?] in N de Bekker-Ketelaars, S Miedema and W L Wardekker (eds), Vormende lerarenopleidingen [Pedagogical Teacher Education] (Utrecht: SWP), 11-21.
WARDEKKER, Willem, L., (1994). Vorming als pedagogische opdracht van de school. The Liberal Education Concept in the Schooling Discussion. Nederlands: Tijdschrift voor Opvoeding, Vorming en Onderwijs 10, 75-90.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com