You are here

HALEF VE SELEF DENETÇİLER ARASINDAKİ İLETİŞİM

Communications Between Successor And Predecessor Auditors

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Globalization, technological improvements, juristic regulations, economic and political policies, diversifications in management perceptions have affected business functions as well as business environment. The said changes in business environment caused operations and structure of auditing profession also to change. Consequently, a reviewing of the relations between auditor and client, and between predecessor and successor auditors became necessary. As a firm changes it’s auditor, old and new auditors of that firm have to communicate with each other. SAS (Statement on Auditing Standards) No. 84, SAS No. 93 and other Practice Alerts are formed to coordinate these communications. Before accepting an engagement, successor auditor must review working papers and reports of predecessor auditor in order to make a decision about the engagement. Reviewing of predecessor’s working papers by the successor, affects the timing, extent and structure of procedures as to the opening balances and compatibility to the accounting principles. It’s the successor’s responsibility to determine the timing, extent and structure of the audit work, and to inform both sides as to the consequences of reviews. In this paper, it is attempted to determine the cores of communication between predecessor and successor auditors based on SAS No. 84. First, regulations as to the said communication are detected and some related concepts are revealed. Later, initiating and conducting of such communications are argued. Furthermore, practical studies in literature as to the subject are reviewed.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Küreselleşme, teknolojik gelişmeler, hukuki düzenlemeler, ekonomik ve siyasi politikalar, yönetim anlayışlarındaki farklılaşmalar işletmelerin çevreleriyle birlikte işletme fonksiyonlarını da etkilemiştir. Değişen iş çevreleri denetim mesleğinin işleyişinin ve yapısının da değişmesine neden olmuştur. Dolayısıyla, denetçimüşteri ve halef-selef denetçi ilişkilerinin yeniden gözden geçirilmesi gerekli hale gelmiştir. İşletme denetçi değiştirdiği takdirde, eski ve yeni denetçiler arasında mutlaka bir iletişim kurulması gerekmektedir. SAS (Statement on Auditing Standards) No.84, SAS No. 93 ve ilgili tebliğler bu iletişimi düzenlemek amacıyla oluşturulmuşlardır. Halef denetçi, denetim sözleşmesini kabul etmeden önce, sözleşme ile ilgili karar vermek amacı ile selef denetçinin çalışma kağıtlarını ve raporlarını gözden geçirmelidir. Halef denetçinin selef denetçinin çalışma kağıtlarını incelemesi, açılış bilançosu ve muhasebe ilkelerine uygunluk ile ilgili olarak izlenecek prosedürlerin yapısını, zamanlamasını ve kapsamını etkileyecektir. Denetim işinin yapısının, zamanlamasının ve kapsamının düzenlenmesi ve sonuçların her iki tarafa da ulaştırılması halef denetçinin sorumluluğundadır. Çalışmada SAS No. 84 esas alınarak halef-selef denetçi arasındaki iletişimin esasları belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Öncelikle söz konusu iletişime ilişkin düzenlemeler incelenmiş ve konu ile ilgili bazı kavramlar açıklanmıştır. Daha sonra da söz konusu iletişimin başlatılması ve yürütülmesi ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca, konuyla ilgili literatürde yer alan uygulamalı çalışmalar da gözden geçirilmiştir
2-14

REFERENCES

References: 

BEATTIE, Vivien ve FEARNLEY, Stealla (1995), The Importance of Audit Firm Characteristics
and the Drivers of Auditor Change in UK Listed Companies, Accounting and Business Research, 25:100,
s. 227-239.
BEATTIE, Vivien ve FEARNLEY, Stealla (1998), Audit Market Competition: Auditor Changes
and Impact of Tendering, The British Accounting Review, 30:3, s. 261-289.
CARMICHAEL, D.R. ve WILLINGHAM, John J. (1986), Perspectives in Auditing, 4. Edition,
Singapore: Mc Graw-Hill International Editions, Accounting Series, s.396.
DUNN, John (1991), Auditing Theory and Practice, HertfordShire: Prentice Hall International
(UK) Ltd., s. 117.
GLEZEN, G. William (1996), The Auditors Change Process, Journal of Accountancy,
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m6280/is_n6_181/ai_18383431 (29.01.2007).
GIBSON, Kim M. ve McEACHERN, Stephen M. (1998), The Once and Future Auditors,
http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/Feb98/gibson.htm (04.03.1999).
HOLLOMAN, T. Vance (2003), Contract to audit accounts and Approval of Interim and Final
Invoices, http://ncdst-webt.treasurer.state.nc.us/lgc/memos/ Memo862.doc (05.02.2003).
JOHNSON, Hubbard (1991), Auditing, 4. Edition, Houston: Dame Publications, Inc., s.94.
LUONG, Thanh (2003), AICPA Audit and Attest Standards, Statement on Auditing Standards
Communications Between Predecessor and Successor Auditors,
http://www.vbbuslnx1.tc.cc.va.us/̃~tcdailj/sasno84.pdf (05.02.2003).
PANY, Kurt (1998), ASB Update as of December 31,
http://www.mhhe.com/business/accounting/pany/asbupdates.html (05.02.2003).
PORTER, Gary A (2003), AICPA Issues New Standard on Communications Between Predecessor
and Successor Auditors, http://www.porterandcompany.com/Articles/sas84.pdf (05.02.2003).
ROBERTSON, J.C. (1996), Auditing, 8.Edition, Richard D. Irwin Inc., s. 103.
TATUM, Kay W. ve MUNTER, Paul (1998), The New Standard on Predecessor – Successor
Communications,
http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/1998/0498/Features/F460498.htm (05.02.2003).
TAYLOR, Donald H. ve G.William GLEZEN (1997), Auditing:An Assertions Approach,
7.Edition, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons Inc., s. 212.
WILLINGHAM, John J. ve CARMICHAEL ,D.R. (1979), Auditing Concepts and Methods,
3.Edition, NewYork: McGraw-Hill Book Company, s. 176.
WITTINGTON, O. R. ve PANY, Kurt (1995), Principles of Auditing, 11. Edition, Chicago:
Richard D. Irwin Inc., s. 145-146.
http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/practmon/recover/appenda.htm (05.02.2003)
http://www.ppc.net.com/news/articles/AandA/2000/article256.htm (05.02.2003)
http://www.gfp.wya.com/features_benefits/newsletter_sample.htm (05.02.2003)
http://www.nasact.org/techupdates/downloads/AICPA/IOP/10_00-IOP.pdf (05.02.2003).
Practice Alert No.2003-03. “Acceptance and Continuance of Audit Clients and Engagement”,
http://www.aicpa.org/download/secps/palert_03_03.pdf (26.01.2007)
http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/secps/lit/ptactice/pralert_02_03.htm.
Practice Alert No.2003-03. “Acceptance and Continuance of Audit Clients and Engagement”,
http://www.aicpa.org/download/secps/palert_03_03.pdf (26.01.2007).
http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/auditstd/anounce/interpsas58.htm
http://www.nysscpa.org/prof_library/Briefingbook/Spring98/accountingserv...
(05.02.2003).
http://www.nysscpa.org/prof_library/Briefingbook/Spring98/accountingserv...
(05.02.2003).
Practice Alert No. 94-3. “Acceptance and Continuance of Audit Clients”,
http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/secps/iit/practice/943 (02.12.1999).
Practice Alert No. 94-3. “Acceptance and Continuance of Audit Clients”,
http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/secps/iit/practice/943 (02.12.1999).
http://www.cpaboard.state.nc.us/8-2001.pdf (05.02.2003)
Practice Alert 97-3. http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/cpaltr/nov97/suppl/ pub.htm (05.02.2003).
http://www.cpaboard.state.nc.us/8-2001.pdf (05.02.2003)

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com