You are here

Analysis of similarities and differences between on-line and face-to-face learning group dynamics

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Organizing in groups does not represent an objective definition, but rather a way to better understand the meaning of plurality. At the same time modern technologies modify perceptive and cognitive transformation. This research shows that on-line groups develop objective dynamics in face-to-face groups; it evaluates the quality of the University student services and studies the dynamics of the creation of face-to-face and on-line groups. Students were divided into experimental on-line (forum, chat, newsgroup) and face-to-face encounters (seminars, laboratories). The two level analyses show the defence mechanisms, the lack of socialization attitudes and the tolerance of differences that characterized on-line groups. The new technologies open new horizons and cognitive functions.
124-141

REFERENCES

References: 

Abruzzese A. (2003) Lessico della comunicazione, (a cura di Giordano V.), Meltemi, Roma.
Allen, W.R., Comerford, R.A. e Ruhe, J.A. (1989). Factor analytic study of Bales' interaction process
analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 701-707.
Ambrosini M., Benini S. (2000) Virtual Groups and Group Dynamics in Innovative Theories, Tools, and
Practises in Work and Organizational Psychology. Vartiainen, Avallone, Anderson, Hogrefe &
Huber Publishers, Toronto.
Asch S.E., (1952), Social Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York.
Bales R.F. (1950) Interaction Process Analysis: a method for the study of small groups. University of
Chicago Press, Chicago.
Barcellona P., De Giorgi R., Natoli S., (2003) Fine della storia e mondo come sistema, Tesi sulla Postmodernità.
Dedalo, Bari.
Bauman Z. (2002) Modernità liquida, Laterza, Bari.
Boca S., Pace U., Severino S., (2009), Apprendimento, relazioni sociali e nuove tecnologie. Edizioni
Unicopoli, Milano.
Bouas K.S., Arrow H. (1996), “The Development of group Identity of Group Identity in Computer and
Face-to-face Groups with Membership Change”. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, pp.
156-178.
Butler, R.B. e Cureton, E.E. (1973). Factor analysis of small group leadership behaviour. The Journal
of Social Psychology, 89, 85-89.
Bruner J. S., La ricerca del significato, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, pp. 104-105.
Cooley C. H. (1909), Social Organization. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.
Dubrovsky V.J., Kiesler S., Sethna B.N. (1991) The Equalization Phenomenon: status effects in
computer mediated and face-to-face Decision making Groups, Human Computer Interaction.
Durkheim, 1893, De la division du travail social, Alcan, Paris; tr. it. La divisione del lavoro sociale,
Sergio Severino & Roberta Messina / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 124-141
140
Comunità, Milano, 1971.
Federici R., (2003) Elementi sociologici della comunicazione nella società post-moderna. Morlacchi,
Perugia.
Giddens A., (1994) Le conseguenze della modernità, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Green A. S., McKenna K.Y.A. (2002) The internet attentuates. The effect of social anxiety, Manuscript
submitted for pubblication, New York University.
Katelyn Y.A. McKenna, Amie S. Green (2002) Virtual group dynamics group. Dynamics: theory,
research and practice, vol. 6, No. 1, 116 –127.
LeaM., Spears R. (1992), “Paralanguage and Social Perception in Computer-mediated
Communication”. Journal of Organization Computing, 2, pp. 321-342.
Lewin K. (1951) Field theory in social science, Harper & Row, New York 1951. tr. it. Teoria e
sperimentazione in psicologia sociale, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1972.
Lipoma M., Severino S. (2008) Metodologia e tecnica del lavoro di gruppo e del gruppo in lavoro. La
Moderna, Enna.
Luhmann N. (1984) Stato di diritto e sistema sociale. trad. italiana Spalla F., Guida, Napoli.
Lyotard J.F. (1981) La condizione postmoderna. Rapporto sul sapere, Feltrinelli, Milano.
Mead G. H. (1967) Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviourist, University of
Chicago.
Michinov N., Michinov E., Toczek-Capelle E. (2004) “Social Identity, Group Processes, and
Performance in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication” Groups Dynamics : Theory,
Research, and Practise, 8, 1, pp. 27-39.
Pignato S., Severino S. (2009) Apprendimento a distanza: la costruzione di un LOM (Learning Object
Metadata), in Boca S., Pace U., Severino S. (2009) Apprendimento, relazioni sociali e nuove
tecnologie. Edizioni Unicopoli, Milano.
Roversi A., (2004) La comunicazione mediata dal computer. Il mulino, Bologna.
Ruggieri S., Pace U. (2009) Il funzionamento psicosociale dei gruppi on line, in Boca S., Pace U.,
Severino S. (a cura di), (2009) Apprendimento, relazioni sociali e nuove tecnologie. Edizioni
Unicopoli, Milano.
Severino S. (2008) La comunicazione del sapere a distanza, La Moderna, Enna.
Severino S. , Lipoma M. (2008), Metodologia e tecnica del lavoro di gruppo e del gruppo in lavoro,
materiali di conoscenza e per la formazione. Enna, La Moderna editori.
Shaw M. E. (1976) Group dynamics (2nd ed.), Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi.
Trujillo, N. (1986). Toward a taxonomy of small group interaction-coding systems. Small Group
Behavior, 17, 371-394.
Turkle S. (1995) Life on the screen. Identity in the age of the internet, New York: Simon & Shuster.
Trad. it. (1997) La vita sullo schermo, Apogeo, Milano.
Sergio Severino & Roberta Messina / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 124-141
141
Turner J. C. (1982) Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group, in Tajfel H. (1982) Social
Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tajifel H. (1976), Psicologia sociale e processi sociali, in Palmonari A. (a cura di), Problemi attuali
della psicologia sociale. Il Mulino, Bologna, 1985.
Zimbardo P., Haney P., Banks c. (1973), Interpersonal Dynamics in simulated prisons, in International
Journal of Criminologies and penoloiy, p.1. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com