You are here

Home » Content

Okuma Uzmanlığının Türkiye’deki Üniversitelerde Lisansüstü Bir Program Olarak Yapılandırılması

Organizing Reading Specialization as a Graduate Program in Universities in Turkey

Journal Name:

  • Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
It is not expected that children having reading difficulties would be successful in different content areas and acquiring their native language skills. Thus it is aimed to increase children’s reading skills in elementary grades. Researchers show that children with reading difficulties keep having the same problems in upper grades and the children also encounter problems including the other subject matters as long as required measures are taken. These facts give great importance to both classroom teachers’ who are responsible for making students acquire literacy skills in Turkey and content area teachers’ beliefs, efficacy, awareness, and teaching and learning process concerning being acquired and improved reading skills. So, the aim of this study was twofold. One of them was to present an approach regarding how to be organized reading specialization in Turkish universities and also was to give some recommendations for Ministry of National Education and the Council of Turkish Higher Education how to organize similar programs in Turkey. In that regard, the contents of similar programs were investigated and more detailed information were given about how to be opened similar programs in Turkey.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Okuma becerilerini yeterli düzeyde geliştiremeyen öğrencilerin diğer disiplinlerde ve kendi ana dillerinde başarılı olmaları beklenemez. Bu sebeple okula başlayan öğrencilerin öncelikle ilköğretim birinci kademede okuma becerilerindeki yeterliklerinin artırılması hedeflenmelidir. Yapılan araştırmalar okumaya ilişkin becerileri yeteri düzeyde kazanamayan öğrencilerin okumadaki problemlerini daha üst sınıflarda da devam ettirdiklerini ve tüm disiplinleri kapsayacak şekilde farklı öğrenme güçlükleri ile karşılaştıklarını ortaya koymuştur. Bu durum gerek temel okuryazarlık becerilerinin kazandırılmasından sorumlu sınıf öğretmenlerinin gerekse de konu alanı öğretmenlerinin okuma becerilerinin kazandırılması ve geliştirilmesine ilişkin inançlarını, yeterliliklerini, farkındalıklarını ve öğretmen eğitim süreçleri ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bundan dolayı bu araştırmanın amacı okuma uzmanlığının üniversitelerde bir lisansüstü eğitim programı olarak yapılandırılmasına yönelik bir yaklaşım ortaya koymak, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı ve Yüksek Öğretim Kurumuna bu alanda ihtiyaç duyulan böyle bir programın nasıl yapılandırılacağına ilişkin önerilerde bulunmaktır. Bu bağlamda uluslararası düzeyde okuma uzmanlığı programlarının içeriği incelenmiş ve programların Türkiye’de nasıl yapılandırılabileceği detaylı bir şekilde açıklanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-okuma-uzmanliginin-turkiyedeki-universitelerde-lisansustu-bir-program-olarak-yapilandirilmasi.pdf
  • 1
132-149
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Allington, R. L., & Broikou, K. A. (1988). Development of shared
knowledge: A new role for classroom and specialist teachers. The
Reading Teacher, 41, 806-811.
Ates, S., & Yıldırım, K. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının ilk okuma ve
yazma sürecinde karşılaşılan öğrenme güçlüklerine ilişkin görüşleri.
İlköğretim Kongresi(15-17 Kasım), Ankara. (Sözlü Bildiri).
Ateş, S., Yıldırım, K., & Yıldız, M. (2010). Opinions of classroom teachers
and prospective classroom teachers about the learning difficulties
encountered in the teaching process of reading and writing.
Elementary Education Online, 9, 44-51.
Bean, R. M., Swan, A. L., & Knaub, R. (2011). Reading specialists in
schools with exemplary reading programs: Functional, versatile,
and prepared. The Reading Teacher, 56, 4446-455.
Coonor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Giuliani, S., Luck, M.,
Underwood, P. S., et al. (2011). Testing the impact of child
characteristics on third graders’ reading comprehension by
differentiating literacy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46,
189-221.
Dole, J. A. (2004). The Changing role of the reading specialist in school
reform. The Reading Teacher, 57, 462-471.
Grittter, K. (2010). Insert student here: Why content area constructions of
literacy matter for pre-service teachers. Reading Horizons, 50, 147-
168.
Growing and learning together. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://kenny.mpls.k12.mn.us/
Hall, L. A. (2005). Teachers and content area reading: Attitudes, beliefs
and change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 403-414.
International Reading Association. (2004). The role and qualifications of the
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 148
reading coach in the United States. Newark, De: Author.
International Reading Association. (2006). Standards for middle and high
school literacy coaches. Newark, DE: Author.
International Reading Association. (2007). Teaching reading well: A
synthesis of the international reading association’s research on teacher
preparation for reading instruction. Newark, DE: Author.
International Reading Association. (2010). Standards for reading
professionals: Revised 2010. Newark, DE: Author.
Jaeger, E. L. (1996). The reading as collaborative consultant. The Reading
Teacher, 49, 622-629.
Johnston, P., Allington, R. L., & Afflerbach, P. (1985). The congruence of
classroom and remedial reading instruction. Elementary School
Journal, 85, 465-78.
Kasten, W. C., & Yıldırım, K. (2011). Türk öğrencilerin iyi birer okuryazar
olmalarına yönelik öneriler. Ankara: Maya Akademi.
McKay, J. (2006). Intertextuality and social construction of meaning.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Oklahoma,
Oklahoma.
Milli eğitim bakanının konuşması. (2011). www.memurlar.net web
sitesinden ulaşılmıştır.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2005). Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Program Kılavuzu (1-5.
Sınıflar). Ankara: Yazar.
Neufeld, P. (2005-2006). Comprehension instruction in content area
classes. The Reading Teacher, 59, 302-312.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000).
Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An
evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading
Yusuf UYAR-Kasım YILDIRIM-Seyit ATEŞ 149
and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–
4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Pikulski, J. J., & Ross, E. (1979). Classroom Teacher’s perceptions of the
role of the reading specialist. Journal of Reading, 23, 126-135
Quaroche, D. J, Bean, R. M., & Hamilton, R. L. (2001). The role of the
reading specialist: A review of research. The Reading Teacher, 55,
282-294.
Risko, V. J., Roller, C. M. Cummins, C., Bean, R. M., Block, C. C. Anders,
P. L., et al. (2008). A critical analysis of research on reading teacher
education. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 252-288.
Shaw, M. L., Smith, W. E., Chesler, B. J., & Romeo, L. (2005). Moving
forward: The reading specialist as literacy coach. Reading Today, 6.
Stagliano, C., & Boon, R. T. (2009). The effects of a story-mapping
procedure to improve the comprehension skills of expository text
passages for elementary students with learning disabilities.
Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 7, 35-58.
Yıldırım, K., & Ateş, S. (2007). Learning disabilities faced during the period of
learning to read write and the necessary measures to be taken. Affective
Education in Action. Conference at Cukurova University (28-30
June), Adana. (Oral Presentation).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com