AYTÜRK, G. (2005). Foucauldian Panopticon in the Public Discourse on Youth in Turkey. MSc Dissertation in Social Policy and Planning in Developing Countries, School of Economics and Political Science Unıversity of London.
BESSANT, J. (2005). “Prıncıples for Developıng Youth Policy: Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Developmental Ethics”. Policy Studies, Vol. 26, No 1. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
CANADIAN COUNCIL ON SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (2002). The Progress of Canada’s Children 2002, Canadian Council on Social Development. Akt: Bessant, J. (2005). “Prıncıples for Developıng Youth Policy: Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Developmental Ethics”. Policy Studies, Vol. 26, No 1. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
CARLSON, C. (2004). “A Rightful Place: Expanding the Role of Young People in a Democratic Society”. The Good Society, Volume 13, No. 2: 39-43.
CF. REPORT (2001). Presented by researchers at the Umea seminar in March. Akt: Commission of the European Communities. European Commission White Paper: A New Impetus for European Youth. 2001.
COLEBATCH, H.K. (2002) Concepts in Social Sciences: Policy, 2nd Edition, Philadelphia: Open University Press. Akt: AYTÜRK, G. (2005). Foucauldian Panopticon in the Public Discourse on Youth in Turkey. MSc Dissertation in Social Policy and Planning in Developing Countries, School of Economics and Political Science Unıversity of London.
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. (2001). European Commission White Paper: A New Impetus for European Youth.
Acar, H. (2008). Türkiye’nin ulusal gençlik politikası nasıl yapılandırılmalıdır? Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri
Dergisi [Bağlantıda]. 5:1. Erişim: http://www.insanbilimleri.com
19
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (2003). Expert on Youth Policy Indicators: Third and Concluding Meeting, Final Report. 26-27 March. Strasbourg.
DEĞİRMENCİOĞLU, S. ve ACAR, H. (2006). Institutional Analysis of Youth Participation, Inclusion and Empowerment in Turkey. Unpublished report presented to World Bank Turkey Branch.
DEMİRÖZ F, Acar, H. (2004) “Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türkiye’de Genç Olmak: Politikalar, Yasal Düzenlemeler ve Kurumsal Hizmetler”. 6. Ulusal Sosyal Hizmetler Konferansı, Küreselleşme, Sosyal Adalet ve Sosyal Hizmetler. 20–22 Mayıs 2004. Yayına Hazırlayan: Acar Hakan ve Diğerleri. Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Derneği Genel Merkezi. Yayın No: 9.
DEVLET İSTATİSTİK ENSTİTÜSÜ. (2005). Nüfus ve Kalkınma İstatistikleri. DİE WEB Sayfası, www.die.gov.tr
DEVLET İSTATİSTİK ENSTİTÜSÜ. 2000 Yılı Genel Nüfus Sayımı.
DOĞAN, O., KENAR, C., DİKER, D., KAMAN, M., DOĞAN, K., DENİZ, O. (2003). “Gençliğe Bakış" Çalışması Final Raporu. Dünya Bankası Türkiye Bürosu. Ankara.
DPT. 5. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1985–1989.
DPT. 6. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1990–1994, Ankara.
DPT. 7. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1996–2000, Ankara.
DPT. 8. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 2001–2005, Ankara.
EUROPEAN YOUTH FORUM (1998). “Resolution on European Youth Policy”, Adopted by the Executive Committee, 3–5 Nisan, Vilnius, Lithuania.
FURLONG, A. (2000). Introduction: Youth in a Changing World, UNESCO, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Akt: AYTÜRK, G. (2005). Foucauldian Panopticon in the Public Discourse on Youth in Turkey. MSc Dissertation in Social Policy and Planning in Developing Countries, School of Economics and Political Science Unıversity of London.
JEUNESSE, LE DEVOIR D’AVENIR, Commissariat Général du Plan, (2001), Report From The Committee Chaired By Dominique Charvet, Mart, s: 33–35. Akt: Commission of the European Communities. European Commission White Paper: A New Impetus for European Youth. 2001.
LANZİERİ, G. ve CORSINI, V. (2006). First Demographic Estimates for 2005. Population and Social Conditions, EUROSTAT.
MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI, Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri 2005–2006: Örgün Eğitim. Ankara.
MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI, Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri 2006–2007: Örgün Eğitim. Ankara.
MUNGER, M.C. (2000) ‘Analysing Policy: Choices, Conflicts and Practices’, New York: W.W. Norton and Company Ltd. Akt: AYTÜRK, G. (2005). Foucauldian Panopticon in the Public Discourse on Youth in Turkey. MSc Dissertation in Social Policy and Planning in Developing Countries, School of Economics and Political Science Unıversity of London.
NEYZİ, L. (2001). ‘Object or Subject? The Paradox of Youth in Turkey’ International Journal of Middle East Studies, 33, s: 411– 432. Akt: AYTÜRK, G. (2005).
Acar, H. (2008). Türkiye’nin ulusal gençlik politikası nasıl yapılandırılmalıdır? Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri
Dergisi [Bağlantıda]. 5:1. Erişim: http://www.insanbilimleri.com
20
Foucauldian Panopticon in the Public Discourse on Youth in Turkey. MSc Dissertation in Social Policy and Planning in Developing Countries, School of Economics and Political Science Unıversity of London.
OZBUDUN, E. (2000). Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Akt: AYTÜRK, G. (2005). Foucauldian Panopticon in the Public Discourse on Youth in Turkey. MSc Dissertation in Social Policy and Planning in Developing Countries, School of Economics and Political Science Unıversity of London.
SIRIANNI, C. ve Friedland, L. (2001). Civic Innovation in America: Community Empowerment, Public Policy, and the Movement for Civic Renewal. University of California Press. Akt: CARLSON, C. (2004). “A Rightful Place: Expanding the Role of Young People in a Democratic Society”. The Good Society, Volume 13, No. 2: 39-43.
SIURALA, L. (tarihsiz). “European Framework of Youth Policy”. Yayınlanmamış Rapor.
SOARES, C. (2000). ‘Aspects of Youth, Transitions, and the End of Certainties’, UNESCO,Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Akt: AYTÜRK, G. (2005). Foucauldian Panopticon in the Public Discourse on Youth in Turkey. MSc Dissertation in Social Policy and Planning in Developing Countries, School of Economics and Political Science Unıversity of London.
TUNALI, İ. (2003). Türkiye’de İşgücü Piyasası ve İstihdam Araştırması. Türkiye İş Kurumu.
TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ, 55. Dönem Hükümet Programı
TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ, 56. Dönem Hükümet Programı
TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ, 57. Dönem Hükümet Programı
TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ, 58. Dönem Hükümet Programı
TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ, 59. Dönem Hükümet Programı
TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANAYASASI. 1982.
TÜRKİYE İŞ KURUMU (2005). Kasım Ayı İstihdam Verileri. www.iskur.gov.tr
UNITED NATIONS. (1995). Background Note, Children’s Rights, The United Nations Department of Public Information, DPI/1765/HR*/December. Akt: Bessant, J. (2005). “Principles for Developing Youth Policy: Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Developmental Ethics”. Policy Studies, Vol. 26, No 1. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
WILLIAMSON H. (2002). Supporting Young People in Europe, Principles, Policy and Practice, Council of Europe.
WILLIAMSON, H. (2003). “The Idea of ‘Youth Policy’, Principles and Practices”. Unpublished Presentation, Riga, Latvia, November.
WOYCICKA, I. (2001). Polonya'daki Sosyal Politika ve İş Gücü Piyasası. Türkiye ve Polonya Değişim Sürecinde İki AB Aday Ülkesi.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
