You are here

Home » Content

Assessment of self-efficacy levels of Toros University students

Journal Name:

  • Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
This study aimed to examine the self-efficacy levels of Toros University students according to some demographic characteristics between 2012-2013 academic year. The sample group includes 325 students studying in different departments in Toros University. Besides the questionnaire that contains demographic information, the self-efficacy scale was used in order to gather the data. The scale was developed Yıldırım and İlhan (2010). One way ANOVA for more than two groups and t test analysis were used. The results showed that there was not any significant difference for selfefficacy levels of students according to their gender, age and families’ income level (p>0.05). As a result it could be said that self-efficacy levels of students did not differ according to the demographic variables which were examined in this research.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-assessment-self-efficacy-levels-toros-university-students.pdf
  • 2
462
466
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Akbaş, A., & Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2006). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının fen öğretimi özyeterlik inançlarının
cinsiyet, öğrenim türü ve üniversitelerine göre incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi
Dergisi, 2(1), 98-110.
Akkoyunlu, S., Kurbanoğlu, S. (2003). Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilgi Okuryazarlığı ve Bilgisayar Öz-
Yeterlik Algıları Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, (24), 1-10
Aydıner,Berent Burcu. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam amaçlarının alt boyutlarının genelyeterlik
yaşam doyumu ve çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans
tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi
Bandura A (1986) Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs,
Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Bandura A (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9): 1175-1184.
Bandura A (1994) Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, cilt 4, VS Ramachaudran (Ed), New
York. Academic Press, 71-81.
Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York Freeman
Bandura A, Adams NE (1977) Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive therapy
and research, 1(4): 287-310.
Gürsel F (2003) Ortopedik Engelli Olmayan Çocuklarda Farklı Hedef Belirleme Türlerinin Dart
Performansına Etkisi ve Aynı Dönemdeki Psisik Süreçlerinin Karsılastırılması, H.Ü. Sağlık
Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamıs Doktora Tezi. Ankara.
Stajkovic, AD. Luthans F. (1998). Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: going beyond traditional
motivational and behavioral approaches. Organizational Dynamics. 26(4), 62-74.
Meece & ark.,(1990). Predictors of Math Anxiety and Its Influence on Young Adolescents Course
Enrollment Intentions and Performance in Mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology.82:1,
60-70.
Morris T., Summeres J. (1995) Sport Psychology, John Willey- Sons, Melbourne.
Sarı, İ., Yenigün, Ö., Altıncı, E.E., Öztürk, A. (2011). Temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların tatmininin genel
öz yeterlik ve sürekli kaygı üzerine etkisi (Sakarya Üniversitesi Spor Yöneticiliği Bölümü
örneği). Spormetre, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(4), 149-156.
Yıldırım F., İlhan İ.Ö., (2010). Genel Özyeterlilik Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve
Güvenilirlik Çalışması, Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2010; 21(4): 301
Zimmerman, B.J. ve Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). “Student differences in self-regulated learning:
Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use”, Journal of Educational
Psychology, 82, 51-59.
Zimmermann, B.J., (1995). “Self-efficacy and educational development”, Self-efficacy in Changing Societies (Ed.
A. Bandura) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com