You are here

Formative assessments as pedagogic tools

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article aims at presenting a state of the art status of formative assessment as a pedagogic tool. To this end, a brief developmental account of different modes of assessment over the last decades will be presented first. Then, formative assessment will be discussed in its constructivist guise. The present literature on assessment suggests that assessment for learning (formative assessment) not only represents an assessment tool but it also serves as a pedagogic tool to enhance learning and thinking. It has also gone to lengths to affect the design of classroom tasks and activities. Attempts have been made to delineate the underlying principles of formative assessment which can be used to picture the formation process of learners‟ knowledge and development. Subsequently, alternative assessment techniques of which the present article will give an account have been suggested by scholars to operationalize these principles.
750-759

REFERENCES

References: 

Mitchell, C., & Vandal, K. (2001). Weighing the Ways of the Flow: Twentieth Century Language
Instruction. Modern Language Journal, 85, 26-38. Theory and Practice. Florida: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Noonan, B., & Duncan, C. R. (2005). Peer and Self-Assessment in High School s. Practical
Assessm ent, Research & Education, 10 (17). Retrieved January 12, 2013 from http://
www. PAREonline.net/getvn.asp
Mantero, M. (2002). Evaluating Classroom Communication: In Support of Emergent and
Authentic Frameworks in Second Language Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research &
Education, 8 (8). Retrieved January 12, from http:// www. PAREonline.net/getvn.asp
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5
(1), 7–74.
Kumar, A. (2013). Formative assessments as pedagogic tools. International Journal of Human Sciences. 10(1), 750-759.
759
Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A Critical Review of Research on Formative Assessment:
The Limited Scientific Evidence of the Impact of Formative Assessment in Education.
Practical Assessment, Research & Education, 14 (7). Retrieved June 6, 2011 from http://
www. PAREonline. net/getvn.asp.
CCSSO. (2008). Attributes of Effective Formative Assessment. Retrieved June 24, 2011 from
http://www.ccsso.org/ Resources/Publications
Assessment Reform Group (ARG). (2002). Assessment For Learning: 10 Principles. Retrieved June
26, 2011 from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org/CIE3.PDF
Schafer, W. D., & Moody, M. (2004). Designing Accountability Assessments for Teaching, Practical
Assessment. Research & Education, 9 (14). Retrieved June 12, 2011 from http:// www.
PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?
Boston, C. (2002). The Concept of Formative Assessment, Practical Assessment. Research &
Education, 8(9). Retrieved June 26, 2011 from http://www. PAREonline.net/ getvn.asp?
Ross, J. A. (2006). The Reliability, Validity, and Utility of Self- Assessment. Practical Assessment,
Research & Education, 11 ( 1 0 ) . R e t r i e v e d J u n e 6 , 2 0 11 f r o m h t t p : / / w
w w. PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?
Rea-Dickens, P. (2000). Classroom Assessment. In T. Hedge (Ed.), Teaching and Learning in the
Language Classroom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Yurdabakan, I., & Erdogan, T. (2009). The Effects of Portfolio Assessment on Reading, Listening
and Writing Skills of Secondary School Prep Class Students. The Journal of International
5'ocial Research, 2(9), 528-538.
Wang, Y H, & Liao, H C. (2008). The Application of Learning Portfolio Assessment for Students
in the Technological and Vocational Education System. Asian Efi Joumal, 1 0(2), 132-
154.
Chen, Y. rvt (2006). EFL Instruction and Assessment with Portfolios: A Case Study in Taiwan.
The Asian EFL Joumal Quarteiiy; 8(1), 69-96.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com