You are here

Home » Content

ÖRGÜTLERDE MOBBİNGİN GÖRÜNMEYEN YÜZÜ: TERS MOBBİNG

THE UNSEEN FACE OF MOBBING IN ORGANIZATIONS: REVERSE MOBBING

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Studies

Publication Year:

  • 2013
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.5076

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Mobbing is an act seen in the organizations where interaction among the individuals is rich and one that is prevalent but cannot be spotted externally. Although the common sense is that it is used by the strong against the week, in the organizations that have a hierarchical and autocratic structure it can be seen as the reverse mobbing that is done by the subordinate against the superior. Mobbing, that emerges with the combination of hierarchy with autocracy even more, is an important agent for the organization atmosphere. The purpose of this study is to improve the concept of reverse mobbing and propound its interaction with mobbing. Accordingly, research has been conducted with the subordinate and the superior working in the X state agency. Differently from the mobbing research in the literature, this study focuses on the reverse mobbing by the subordinate against the superior, and emphasizes the significance of mobbing from the point of organizations, and puts forth the interaction of mobbing with reverse mobbing. Due to the fact that mobbing differs in organizations, sampling volume has been limited to the state agency chosen for the research. In the research the mobbing variable consisting of 5 factors in Leymann’s mobbing typology has been associated with the reverse mobbing variable consisting of three factors in the same typology. The four main hypothesis and eight sub hypothesis generated by this method have been analysed by correlation, regression, and chi-square independence test analyses. The analyses have identified a significant relationship between mobbing and reverse mobbing. According to the findings, ‘attacks to quality of life profession status’ factor, among all mobbing factors, affects reverse mobbing the most.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Mobbing, bireyler arası etkileşimin yoğun olduğu örgütlerde görülen, yaygın ancak genellikle dışarıdan farkedilemeyen bir eylemdir. Daha çok güçlünün zayıfa uyguladığı bir eylem gibi düşünülse de hiyerarşik ve otokratik yapıya sahip örgütlerde astların üstlerine karşı uyguladığı ters mobbing şeklinde de görülebilmektedir. Hiyerarşinin otokratik yapıyla birleşmesiyle birlikte daha da çok ortaya çıkan mobbing, örgüt atmosferi için önemli bir etkendir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ters mobbing kavramını geliştirerek, bu kavramın mobbing ile etkileşimini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaca bağlı olarak, X kamu dairesinde çalışan astlara ve üstlere yönelik bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Literatürde yer alan mobbing araştırmalarından farklı olarak bu çalışmada, astın üste uyguladığı ters mobbing üzerinde durulmuş, mobbingin örgütler açısından önemi vurgulanarak, mobbingin ters mobbing ile olan etkileşimi ortaya konulmuştur. Mobbingin örgütlere göre farklılık göstermesinden dolayı örneklem hacmi, araştırma için seçilen kamu dairesi ile kısıtlanmıştır. Araştırmada Leymann’ın mobbing tipolojisindeki beş faktörden oluşan mobbing değişkeni ile yine bu tipolojideki üç faktörden oluşan ters mobbing değişkeni ilişkilendirilmiştir. Bu yönteme göre oluşturulan dört ana hipotez ve sekiz alt hipotez; korelasyon, regresyon ve ki-kare bağımsızlık testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda mobbing ile ters mobbing arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Elde edilen bulgulara göre ters mobbingi, mobbing faktörleri arasında en fazla “yaşam kalitesine ve meslek durumuna yönelik saldırılar” faktörü etkilemektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-orgutlerde-mobbingin-gorunmeyen-yuzu-ters-mobbing.pdf
  • 8
2167
2183
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

AKGÜL, Aziz ve Osman Çevik (2005). İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri, 2. Baskı, Emek Yayınları, Ankara. BURTSCHER, Klaudia und Gerhard Pusnik (2003). Mobbıng in Vorarlberg: Ursachen, Auswirkungen und vorhandene Hilfestellungen für Betroffene, Auftrag des Beschäftigungspaktes Vorarlberg, Wolfern. ÇOBANOĞLU, Şaban (2005). Mobbing ve Başa Çıkma Yöntemleri, Timaş Yayıncılık, İstanbul. DAVENPORT, Noa, Ruth Distler Schwartz and Gail Pursell Elliott (2003). Mobbing: İşyerinde Duygusal Taciz, Çev: Osman Cem Önortay, Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul. DUFFY, Maurenn and Len Sperry (2012). Mobbing: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions, Oxford University Press, United States. HALAC, D. Seçkin ve Çağrı Bulut . “ReMobbing: A Review of Turkish Literature”, Social Responsibility, Professional Ethics, and Management Proceedings of the 11th International Conference, 24-27 November 2010, Ankara. HANLEY, Glennis. “Don't Do What I Do – Just Bloody Well Do What I Say! The Workplace Bullying Experiences of Australian Academics”, Working Paper Series - Department of Business Management, 63(3) (2003), p.1-10. KEASHLY, Loraleigh. “A Researcher Speaks to Ombudsmen About Workplace Bullying”, Journal of the International Ombudsman Association, (3)2 (2010), p.10-24. KLEIMBAUM, David. G, Lawrence L. Kupper, Keith E. Muller and Azhar Nizam (2008). Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariable Methods, Thomson Higher Education, USA. KOIV, Kristi. “Bullying in a School Context: Teachers as Victims”, Psicologia e Educação, 1-2 (2011), p.95-106. LEYMANN, Heinz and Annelie Gustafsson. “Mobbing at Work and The Development of Post-traumatic Stress Disorders.”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5 (1996), p.251-275. LEYMANN, Heinz. “Mobbing and Psychological Terror at Workplaces”, Violence and Victims, 5(2) (1990), p.119-126. LYNCH, Jessica (2002). Workplace Bullying: Implications for Police Organisations, Critical Issues in Policing Paper 8. MCNAMARA, Mannix. “Workplace Bullying: Critical Reflections and The Problematic of Culture”, Adelaide International Workplace Conflict Conference, 21-23 April 2004, Australia. MEERE, Michael (2002). “Employee Engagement: Leadership Styles and Dysfunctional Management Practices”, The College for Adult Learning, (2002), p: 1-11. MINIBAŞ, Jale ve Meltem İdiğ (2009). Psikolojik Taciz – İş Yerinde Kabus, 1. Baskı, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara. NAMIE, Gary and Ruth Namie (2000). The Bully at Work, Sourcebooks, Naperville. ÖZLER, D. Ergun ve Nuray Mercan (2009). Yönetsel ve Örgütsel Açıdan Psikolojik Terör, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
The Unseen Face Of Mobbing In Organizations: Reverse Mobbing 2183
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/8 Summer 2013
PAOLI, Pascal and Damien Merllie (2000). Third European Survey on Working Conditions 2000, European Foundation, Dublin. PRANJIC, Nurka, Ljiljana Maleš-Bilić, Azijada Beganlić and Jadranka Mustajbegović. “Mobbing, Stress, and Work Ability Index Among Physicians in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Survey Study”, Croat Med Journal, 47(5) (2006), p.750-758. QUINE, Lyn. “Workplace Bullying in Nurses”, Journal of Health Psychology, 6(1) (2001), p.73-84. TUTAR, Hasan (2004). İşyerinde Psikolojik Şiddet, 3.Baskı, Platin Yayıncılık, Ankara. ZAPF, Dieter. “Organizational, Work Group Related and Personel Causes of Mobbing / Bullying at Work”, International Journal Manpower, 20(1/2) (1996), p.70-85. ZAPF, Dieter and Stale Einarsen. “Individual Antecedents of Bullying Victims and Perpetrators”, Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace, (2003), p: 165-184. ZENGER, John and Joseph Folkman (2002). The Extraordinary Leader: Turning Good Managers into Great Leaders, McGraw-Hill, United States.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com