A Case Study on Use of One-to-One Laptops in English as Second Language Classrooms

American Library Association. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/standards.pdf
Baker, E., Gerhardt, M., & Herman, J. (1994). Evaluating the apple classrooms of tomorrow. In E. Baker, & H. O'Neil, Jr. (Eds), Technology Assessment in Education and Training (pp. 173-
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2012, 3(4)
44
198). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395–414.
Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to One Computing: A Summary of the Quantitative Results
from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2).
Bebell, D., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1).
Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222-247.
Donovan, L., Green, T., & Hartley, K. (2010). An Examination of One-to-One Computing in the Middle School: Does Increased Access Bring About Increased Student Engagement? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(4), 423-441.
Drayton, B., Falk, J. K., Stroud, R., Hobbs, K., & Hammerman, J. (2010). After Installation: Ubiquitous Computing and High School Science in Three Experienced, High-Technology Schools. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(3), 1-57.
Education Week (2004). Global links: Lessons from the world. Technology Counts 2004, 23(35), 8-98. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/media/ew/tc/archives/TC04full.pdf
Franklin, C. A., & Bolick, C. M. (2007). Technology Integration: A Review of the Literature. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (San Antonio, TX, Mar 2007. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED504169.pdf
Garthwait, A., & Weller, H. G. (2005). A year in the life: Two seventh grade teachers implement one-to-one computing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 361- 377.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Greaves, T. (2008, November 18). 1:1 computing large-scale 1:1 implementations are alive and well. K-12 Computing Blueprint. Retrieved from http://www.k12blueprint.com/k12/blueprint/cd/ResultsWebinarArchive.pdf
Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Learning with laptops: A multimethod case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 305–332.
Gulek, J. C., & Demirtas, H. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2), 1-38.
Hernandez-Ramos, P. (2005). If not here, where? Understanding teachers’ use of technology in Silicon Valley schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 39–64.
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2012, 3(4)
45
Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2006). The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating Technology into K-12 Teaching and Learning: Current Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
Hirsch, J. (2005, May 1). Solving the one-to-one computing dilemma. eSchool News. Retrieved from http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/topnews/index.cfm?i=36348&CFID=7406683&C...
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors Affecting Technology Integration in K-12 Classrooms: A Path Model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154.
ISTE (2007). NETS Project. NETS for students 2007. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/NETS_for_Stu...
Jaber, W. E., & Moore, D. M. (1999). A survey of factors which influence teachers’ use of computer-based technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), 253-260.
Lei, J. (2010). Conditions for Ubiquitous Computing: What Can Be Learned from a Longitudinal Study. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 35-53.
Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). One-to-one computing: What does it bring to schools? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(2), 97-122.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Corwin Press, Inc.
Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. M. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 23–44.
Lowther, D. L., & Ross, S. M. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://crep.memphis.edu/web/research/pub/Laptop_AERA_2003.pdf.
Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., Strahl, J. D., Inan, F. A., & Pollard, D. (2005). Freedom to learnprogram: Michigan 2004-05 evaluation report. Retrieved March 20, 2008, fromhttp://www.ftlwireless.org
Lowther, D. L., Strahl, J. D., Inan, F. A., Bates, J. (2007). Freedom to Learn Program Michigan2005-2006 Evaluation Report: Prepared for the Freedom to Learn and the One-to-One Institute. Memphis, TE: Center for Research in Educational Policy.
Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361-373.
McNabb, M., Hawkes, M., & Rouk, U. (1999). Critical issues in evaluating the effectiveness of technology. Secretary’s Conference on Educational Technology: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Technology, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/techconf99/confsum.pdf
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2012, 3(4)
46
Meskill, C., & Mossop, J. (2000). Technology use with ESL learners in NewYork State: Preliminary report. Educational Computing Research, 22(3), 265-284.
Molnar, A. S. (1997) Computers in education: a brief history. T.H.E Journal, 24(11), 63-68.
Newman, H. (2002). Computers used more to learn than teach. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved, from http://www.freepress.com/news/education/newman26_20020226.html
Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). Envisioning the handheld-centric classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 281-294.
Office of Educational Technology. (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/plan.pdf
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2006). Assessment of 21st century skills. Retrieved from www.p21.org/documents/Assessment092806.pdf
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ross, S. M., Smith, L., Alberg, M., & Lowther, D. (2004). Using classroom observations as aresearch and formative evaluation tool in educational reform: The school observation measure. In S. Hilberg & H. Waxman (Eds.), New directions for observational research in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms (pp. 144–173). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
Russell, M. (1999). Testing Writing on Computers: A Follow-up Study Comparing Performance on Computer and on Paper. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(20). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n20/.
Russell, M. (2002). It’s time to upgrade: Tests and administration procedures for the new millenium. Essays in Education, 1(1), 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.usca.edu/essays/vol12002/time_to_upgrade_revised.pdf
Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 313-330.
Russell, M. (1999). Testing Writing on Computers: A Follow-up Study Comparing Performance on Computer and on Paper. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(20). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n20/.
Russell, M., & Haney, W. (2000). Bridging the Gap Between Testing and Technology in Schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(19). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n19.html
Russell, M., & Plati, T. (2002). Does it matter with what I write? Comparing performance on paper, computer and portable writing devices. Current Issues in Education [On-line], 5 (4). Retrieved from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume5/number4/
Russell, M., & Plati, T. (2001). Mode of Administration Effects on MCAS Composition Performance for Grades Eight and Ten. Teachers College Record, [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10709
Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching With Technology: Creating Student-Centered Classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2012, 3(4)
47
Shapley, K. S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). Evaluating the Implementation Fidelity of Technology Immersion and its Relationship with Student Achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(4), 4-68.
Schneiderman, M. (2004). What does SBR mean for education technology? THE Journal, 31(11), 30–36.
Silvernail D. L. & Lane D.M. (2004). The Impact of Maine’s One-to-One Laptop Program on Middle School Teachers and Students: Research Report #1. Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine, ME.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suhr, K. A., Hernandez, D.A., Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Laptops and Fourth-Grade Literacy: Assisting the Jump over the Fourth-Grade Slump. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(5).
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlehofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swan, K., Kratcoski, A., Mazzer, P., & Schenker, J. (2005). Bringing Mohamed to the mountain: Situated Professional development in a ubiquitous computing classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(4), 353-365.
Swan, K., Van’T Hooft, M., Kratcoski, A., & Schenker, J. (2007). Ubiquitous computing and changing pedagogical possibilities: Representations, conceptualizations and uses of knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 481-515.
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz: University of California, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., & Stone, L. (2004). Technology and equity in schooling: Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy, 18(4), 562-588.
Watts, D. C. (2009). Technology leadership, school climate, and technology integration: A correlation study in K-12 public schools. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertation database. (UMI No. 3369776).
Wenglinsky, H. (2005). Using technology wisely: The keys to success in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Whitehurst, G., & Fishel, J. (2001). Enhancing emergent literacy among children in head start: A review of research and examination of the promise of computer-based interventions. Stony Brook: State University of NewYork.
Woodward, J. (2001). Constructivism and the Role of Skills in Mathematics Instruction for Academically At-Risk Secondary Students. Special Services in the Schools, 17(1/2), 15-31.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.