You are here

Television Advertisements: A Reception Study

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper focuses on an analysis of advertising reception and explores how audiences interpret advertisements. The study attempted to answer how female and male participants interpret advertisements with symbolic expressions and advertisements with direct messages. The main purpose is to define differences in interpretation of advertisements based on gender. In this process, a two-stage approach is employed in order to examine the audience reception in the context of television advertising. In this study, we first identified the characteristic features of the advertisements, later we intended to explore the reception of advertisements. The first stage of the study evaluated the contribution of 21 participants in Antalya, Turkey determined by snowball sample with male and female participants within the age range 21-55 years. The participants articulated written reactions to two advertisements instantly displayed on computer screen. Participants were subject to viewing those advertisements and responding ready-made questions on paper. In the second stage, considering Höijer (1990)'s study, a focus group discussion was conducted in order to reveal more detailed information as a second stage of the research. This group consisted of 10 participants of the first stage. A semi-structured focus group discussion was employed for our study which allowed group interaction. Our findings revealed a difference in interpretation based on the gender of the participant. This reception study is one of the few researches done in the field in Turkey. It is also expected to make a contribution to gender studies.
40
66

REFERENCES

References: 

Alexander, L., Benjamin, L.M., Hoerrner, K., & Roe, D. (1998). We'll be back in a moment: A content analysis of advertisements in children's television in the 1950s. Journal of Advertising, 27(3),
1-9.
Allen, M., Titsworth, S., & Hunt, Stephen K. (2009). Quantitative research in communication. Los
Angeles: Sage Publications. Ayaşlıoğlu, E. (2007). Yoksuluuk ve reklam algısı/ Reklam metin/erine yönelkk algıaamalar üzerine bir
aaan çalışması (Unpublished MSc dissertation). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler
Enstitüsü.
Barak, B. S.
(2009)
. The third person effect in Israeli women's attitude to tv commercials and their
images. The Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (21 May2009)
Marriott, Chicago, IL Online. Retriewed from
http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p295264_index.html Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral
sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2), 141-163. Curran, J. (1990). The new revisionism in mass communication research: A reappraisal. European
Journal of Communication, 5(2), 135-164. Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act. Chicago: Aldine.
Elliot, R., Jones, A., Benfield, A., & Barlow, M. (1995). Overt sexuality in advertising: A discourse analysis of gender responses. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18(2-3), 187-217.
Hogg, M.K. and Garrow, J. (2003). Gender, identity and the consumption of advertising. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 6(3), 160-174.
Höijer, B. (1990). Studying viewers' reception of television programmes: Theoretical and methodological considerations. European Journal of Communication, 5(1), 29-56.
Kaderka, P. (2006). Advertising in the non-profit sector: An analysis of the reception of non¬commercial advertising in focus group discussions. Sociologicky Casopis. Czech Sociological
Review, 42(2), 379-402.
Koudelova, R. and Whitelock, J. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of television and advertising in the UK and Czech Republic. International Marketing Review, 18(3), 286-300.
64
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, July 2011, 2(3)
Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B.C. (2002). Quaiitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1992). On resonance: A critical pluralistic inquiry into advertising
rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 180-197. Mick, D. G., & Buhl, C. (1992). A meaning based model of advertising experiences. Journal of
Consumer Research, 26(1), 317-338. Mick, D. G., & Politi, L. (1989). Consumers' interpretations of advertising imagery: A visit to the hell of
connotation. in Hirschman, E. (Ed.) Interpretive Consumer Research. Provo, UT: Association
for Consumer Research. 85-96. Phillips, B. (2000). The impact of verbal anchoring on consumer responses to images advertisements.
Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 15-24. Priest, S. H. (2010). Doing media research: An introduction. California: Sage Publications. Plunkey, N. (2010). A student-centered study of advertising rhetoric: Theory and currccuaa for
composition classrooms (PhD dissertation). United States of America: University of Nevada. Raftopoulou, C. (2007). Audience reception of health-promoting advertising: Young adult smokers
make-sense, interpret and decode shocking anti-smoking advertisements (MSc dissertation).
England: London School of Economics and Political Science. Sandikci, O. (1999). Postmodern advertising and its reception (PhD dissertation). United States of
America: Pennsylvania State University. Sandikci, O. (1998). Images of women in advertising: A critical-cultural perspective. in Basil G. Englis
and Anna Olofsson (Eds.), European Advances in Consumer Research (Volume 3). Provo,
UT: Association for Consumer Research. 76-81. Wharton, C. (2005). Text and context: An analysis of advertising reception (Unpublished PhD Thesis).
United Kingdom: University of Northumbria. Wicks, J. L., Fosu, I., & Wicks, R.H. (2009). Dual-modality disclaimers, emotional appeals, and
production techniquies in food advertising airing during programs rated for children. Is there
a good balance. Journal of Advertising, 38(4), 93-105. Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Yannopoulou, N., & Elliott, R. (2008). Open versus closed advertising texts and interpretive
communities. International Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 9-36.
Yıldırım
, A., & Şimşek, H. (2000). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntem/eri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com