You are here

INTERNET USE ADOPTION AMONG ACADEMICIANS: Comparing Innovative Adopters and Other Adopter Types

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Online shopping represents an innovation to be adopted or rejected by online consumers globally. Previous experiences and knowledge of innovation are the main factors affecting people’s willingness to adopt a new innovation. We explore how Internet use differs between academicians who are innovative adopters and other types of adopters. Academicians who are innovative adopters are hypothesized to:  have more years of experience on online shopping,  have greater frequency of purchase, and  pay a higher price for items purchased online. Data were collected from 301 respondents. Results provide new perspective on innovative adopters among Malaysian academicians; they have less experience than other adopters in shopping for products online, make fewer purchases online and pay small amount of money in shopping for products online than other adopters. Directions for future research are also discussed.

REFERENCES

References: 

eMarketer (2002). “Higher Online Spending Recorded in 2002”, accessed 25 March
2004.http://www.matrade.gov.my/ecommerce/news-archive/2003/ecom-012003.htm
Geoghegan, W. H. (1994). “What ever happened to instructional technology?” Paper
presented at the 22nd Annual Conference of the International Business Schools
Computing Association. Baltimore, Maryland.
Goldsmith, R.E. (2000). “How innovativeness differentiates online buyers”, Quarterly
Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 323-33.
Goldsmith, Ronald E., Newell, Stephen J. (1997). “Innovativeness and price sensitivity:
managerial, theoretical and methodological issues”, The Journal of Product and Brand
Management. Santa Barbara:. Vol. 6, Iss. 3; p. 163.
Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. (1996). “Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated
environments: Conceptual foundations,” Journal of Marketing, volume 60, issue July,
pp. 50-68.
Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). “Scales for the measurement of
innovativeness,” Human Communication Research, volume 4, number 1, pp. 58-65.
“Jupiter Research Market Forecast: U.S. Retail 2004-2008”, accessed 5 March 2005.
At http:// www.jupitermedia.com/corporate/release/04.01.20-newjupresearch.html
Korgaonkar, P.K. (1984) “Consumer shopping orientation, non-store retailers, and
consumers' patronage intentions: a multivariate investigation”, Journal of the Academy
of Marketing Science, Vol. 12, Winter, pp. 11-12.
Korgaonkar, P.K. and Smith, A. E. (1986). “Psychographic and demographic correlates of
electronic in-home shopping and banking service”, in Shimp, T.A., John, G., Lingren,
J.H., Gardner, M.P., Sharma, S., Quelch, J.A., Dillon, W. and Dyer, R.E., (Eds), 1986
American Marketing Association Educator's Proceedings, American Marketing
Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 67-9.
Lohse, G., Bellman, S. and Johnson, E.J. (2000). “Consumer Buying on the Internet:
Findings from Panel Data”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, volume 14, pp. 15-29.
“Moving the MSC Towards Becoming a World-Class Technology Hub,” accessed 8 April
2005, athttp://www.matrade.gov.my/ecommerce/news-archive/2004/ecom-
132004.htm,In PM's Opening Remarks at the Launch of 8th IAP Meeting, 2 September
2004, Putrajaya Convention Centre.
31
Norazah M. S. (2003). “Internet Users’ Behaviour and Adoption in Purchasing Products
and Services via Virtual Storefront,” Malaysian Journal of Consumer & Family
Economics, volume 6, September.
Robertson, T. S. (1971). Innovative behavior and communication. New York : Holt,
Reinhart, and Winston.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. 4th edition. New York, NY : The Free
Press.
Yesil, M. (1997). Creating the Virtual Store: Taking your Web Site from Browsing to
Buying. Wiley. 364p.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com