You are here

Home » Content

Productivist Education vs. Contextual Learning: Evaluation and the Place of ‘Flexibility’ in Discourses of Online Education Systems

Journal Name:

  • The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Publication Year:

  • 2004
Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper provides a largely conceptual discussion which focuses on how productivist education systems can be perpetuated in approaches to online education. We hold that, since notions of flexibility can shape educational contexts, evaluators of online courses would benefit from the knowledge that flexibility is a concept that bears a particular meaning in productivist perspectives. The paper highlights the difference between using new technologies to continue to ‘educate’ and using those technologies to address the needs that account for learners’ contexts. We argue that education (in its productivist tradition) refers to teaching according to pre-determined notions and rules of what learners should do in order to become knowledgeable about (and often have the ‘right’ attitude towards) something. Relevant learning, on the other hand, refers to teaching through interactive processes that are sufficiently flexible to account for the myriad of individual learning approaches/styles, capacities to adapt to or to mould a learning environment and the varying degrees of technological proficiency relevant to accessing online courses.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-productivist-education-vs.contextual-learning-evaluation-and-place-flexibility-discourses-online-education-systems.pdf
  • 3
  • English

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Australian National Training Authority. (ANTA). (1998). Plan assessment. In Resource for
the training package: Assessment and Workplace Training (BSZ98). Canberra, ACT: Author.
Benjamin, A. (1994). Affordable, restructured education: A solution through information
technology. RSA Journal (May), 43-49.
Bishop, R. (1994). Initiating empowering research? New Zealand Journal of Educational
Studies, 29(1), 175-188.
Bofinger, I., & Whateley, G. (2002). The virtual conservatorium: A new emerging option for
conservatoria. In B. A. Knight (Ed.), Reconceptualising learning in the knowledge society
(pp. 134-149). Flaxton, Qld: Post Pressed.
Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world. London and Sterling:
Kogan Page and Stylus Publishing.
Evans, T. D. (2003). Technology, interaction and learners’ contexts. In T. D. Evans (Ed.),
Foundations of flexible, online and distance education: Study guide (pp. 3-13). Geelong, Vic:
Deakin University.
Evans, T. D., & Nation, D. E. (1993). Educational technologies: Reforming open and distance
education. In T. D. Evans & D. E. Nation (Eds.), Reforming open and distance education:
Critical reflections from practice (pp. 196-214). London: Kogan Page.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. New York, London and
New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.Huitt, B. (1999). Evaluation. In Valdosta University’s online educational psychology
resources. Retrieved May 14, 2003, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/
intro/evalu.html
Illich, I. (1973). Deschooling society. Harmondsworth, UK.
Kavanagh, M., & Henry, J. (2002). Unpublished paper. Geelong, Vic: Faculty of Education,
Deakin University.
McClintock, R. (1999). The educators manifesto: Renewing the progressive bond with
posterity through the social construction of digital learning communities. New York:
Institute for Learning Technologies, Teachers College. Retrieved April 25, 2003, from
http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/manifesto/contents.html
Noble, D. F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. First
Monday, 3(1). Retrieved April 25, 2003, from http://www.firstmonday.dk
Owen, J. M. with Rogers, P. (1999). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches. Crows
Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University
Press.
Prior, S. (2001). A program evaluation primer. The Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1),
34-40.
Veen, W. (2002). Celebrating Homo Zappiens: Adapting to new ways of learning using ICT.
In British Council’s Learning for All in a global society seminar series: Seminar A. Retrieved
April 25, 2003, from
http://www.britishcouncil.org/education/conference/2002/seminars/seminar...

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com