You are here

1991 Körfez Savaşında İsrail’in Pozisyonunun Bir Değerlendirmesi

An Assessment of Israel’s Position in the 1991 Gulf War

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The Persian Gulf War was one of the defining incidents that shaped the current situation of the Middle East. There has been a vast amount of studies about this conflict but on a specific case why Israel stayed out of the conflict even though she was attacked continues to be an intriguing question for researchers. Saddam’s decision on invading Kuwait and the war following this is going to be summarized in order to present the structure when this incident took place and also to build an environment in which Israel’s decision on refraining itself from the war is going to be analyzed. Israel is perceived as one of the most aggressive countries in the Middle East mostly because of the wars that it included so far and the grand projects that it wants to put in practice in the future. With these assumptions it is rather hard to understand Israel’s passive behaviour during the Persian Gulf War and possible reasons of this is going to be main focus of this study to understand the motivations behind such policy. Israel’s state in that period and its capacity will be analyzed in order to understand whether this decision was taken directly and solely by Israel or it was a result of long-going dependency to another country or any other possible situation. Possible reasons that resulted with Israel’s passive attitude will be under the scope to explain whether what Israel did was rather rational or not. In addition to that, the advantages that Israel enjoyed and disadvantages that it faced will be shown at the last part of the study.
Abstract (Original Language): 
1991 Körfez Krizi Orta Doğu’nun şu anki vaziyetinin şekillenmesinde en etkili faktörlerden birisi olmuştur. Bu kriz hakkında birçok çalışma yapılmış ve İsrail’in saldırıya uğramasına ragmen pasif tutumunu devam ettirmesi araştırmacılar için ilgi çekici bir husus olarak öne çıkmıştır. Saddam Hüseyin’in Kuveyt’i işgal etme kararını takip eden bu savaş hülasa olarak anlatılacak ve İsrail’in aldığı bu kararın oluştuğu dış yapı aktarılmaya çalışılacaktır. İsrail bu savaş dışında Ortadoğu’nun en aktif ve agresif devleti olarak nitelendirilebilecek ve günümüz topraklarını revizyonist bir yaklaşımla genişletme amacında olan bir devlet olarak kabul edilecektir. Bu yaklaşım İsrail’İn 1991 Savaşı’ndaki pasif tutumunu daha ön plana çıkaracağı ve problematize edeceği için tercih edilmiştir. Bu davranış, İsrail’in o dönemdeki sosyal, askeri ve diplomatik gücü dikkate alınarak analiz edilecektir. Bu analiz sonrasında İsrail’in bu kararı kendi fayda-zarar analizleri sonucunda alıp almadığı sorusu üzerinde durulacak ve buna cevap aranacaktır. İsrail’in bu tavrının bu şekilde analizi ile bu hareketin rasyonel bir hareket olup olmadığı ve süpriz devlet davranışı olarak sayılıp sayılmayacağına bakılacaktır. Ve bu seçimin sonucu olarak İsrail’in elde ettiği çıktılar sonuç bölümünde analiz edilecektir.
165
186

REFERENCES

References: 

Books and Articles
Abraham Ben-Zvi, “The U.S. & Israel: The Limits of the Special Relationship”,
New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Aharon Levran, “Israeli strategy after Desert Storm: Lessons of the Second
Gulf War BESA studies in international Security, , London: Frank Cass,
1997.
Amatzia Baram, “The Invasion of Kuwait: Decision Making in Baghdad,”
in Iraq’s Road to War, (ed.) Amatzia Baram and Barry Rubin, London:
Macmillan, 1993.
Avi Shlaim, “Israel and Gaza in Historical Perspective” in Alex Danchev
and Dan Keohane, eds. International Perspectives on the Gulf Conlict, 1990-
91, London, St Martin’s Press, 1994, pp. 59-79.
Barak Mendelsohn, “Israeli self-defeating Deterrence in the 1991
Gulf War”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 26:4 2003, DOI: 10.1080/0141-
2390312331279698, pp. 83-107.
Bernard Reich, A Brief History of Israel, Second Edition, New York, 2008
David Horowitz, The Israeli Conception of National Security: The Constant
and the Changing in Israeli Strategic Thought, 1973, pp. 36-38
Edward M. Spiers, Chemical Warfare, Chicago: University of Illinois,
1986.
Efraim Inbar, Israel’s National Security: Issues and Challanges Since the
Yom Kippur War, New York: Routledge 2008
Eric Karsenty, Joshua Shemer, Itzhik Alshech, Bruno Cojocaru, Marian
Moscovitz, Yair Shapiro, Yehuda L. Danon, “Medical Aspects of the Iraqi Missile
Attacks on Israel,” Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 27, 1991, pp.
603-607.
Hal Brands, “Saddam and Israel: What Do the New Iraqi Records Reveal?”,
Diplomacy & Statecraft, 2011, Vol. 22. 2011, Taylor & Francis Group,
LLC, pp. 500-520.
Hal Brands and David Palkki, “Saddam, Israel, and the Bomb, Nuclear
185
An Assessment of Israel’s Position in the 1991 Gulf War
Alarmism Justifed?”, International Security, Vol. 36, No. 1, (Summer 2011),
pp. 133–166.
George N. Lewis & Steve Fetter, and Lisbeth Gronlund (1993), “Casualties
and Damage From Scud Attacks In The 1991 Gulf War”, Working Paper
for Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Defense And Arms Control Studies
Program
Gerald M. Steinberg, “Israeli Responses to the Threat of Chemical Warfare”,
Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, Fall 1993, pp. 85-101.
Jack Donnelly, “Realism”, in Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater (eds.),
Theories of International Relations, 5th Edition 2013, Palgrave Macmillan.
James A Baker, The Politics of Diplomacy, New York, Putnam, 1995.
J. J. Goldberg, “Doves and Hawks Together: American Jews, Israel and
the War”, Commonweal, 1991.
Janice J. Terry, “The United States and Iraq at cross purposes – a Historic
Overview”, International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies, Volume 2
Number 3, Intellect Ltd, 2008.
Joel Beinin and Lisa Hajjar, “Palestine, Israel and Arab-Israeli Conflict: A
Primer”, MERIP: Middle East Research and Information Project.
Kenneth N. Waltz, “Theory of International Politics”, Long Grove: Waveland
Press, 1979
Kemal İnat, “Irak: ABD ve Saddam Hüseyin İşbirliği ile Gelen Yıkım”,
(in) Kemal İnat and Burhanettin Duran et. al. (eds.) Dünya Çatışmaları Çatışma
Bölgeleri ve Konuları, Ankara: Nobel Yayınları 2009.
Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, The Gulf Conflict, Princeton University
Press, New Jersey, 1993.
Mike Eisenstadt, “The Sword of the Arabs:” Iraq’s Strategic Weapons,
Policy Paper 21, Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1990, Washington
D.C.
Phebe Marr, The Modern History of Iraq, 3rd ed. 2012, Philadelphia:
Westview Press.
186
Furkan Halit Yolcu
Richard N. Lebow, “Classical Realism”, in Tim Dunne et. al. (eds.), International
Relations Theories (Discipline and Diversity), Oxford University
Press, 2010
Scott B. Lasensky, “Friendly Restrained: U.S.-Israel Relations During the
Gulf War Crisis of 1990-9”, Middle East Review of International Affairs, June
1999
Shai Feldman, “Israel’s Grand Strategy”, paper presented at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, 7 May, Cambridge, 1997.
Shamir Yitzhak, “Summing Up”, Boston: Little Brown and and Coop.,
1994
Yoav Ben-Horin & Barry Posen, “Israel’s Strategic Doctrine”, Prepared
Report for the Office of Secretary of Defense 1981, California: Rand.
William Quandt, Peace Process, Brookings Institution, Washington, 1993.
Ze’ev Schiff, “Israel After The War”, Foreign Affairs, Spring 91, Vol. 70
Issue 2, p19-33.
Web Resources
Illian Bar, “Israel After the Gulf War”, Commentary, 1991, pp. 35-40.
Joel Brinkley, “War In The Gulf: Israel; Israelis Say Their Patience with
Scud Attacks Is Thin”, The New York Times, Published: January 30 1991
Norman Podhoretz, “In Israel with Scuds and Patriots”, Commentary,
April 1991, pp. 19-26.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com