You are here

Design and Pedagogy Features in Online Courses: A survey

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The study investigates the preferences of instructors and students for design and pedagogy features of online instruction at the post-graduate level. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study was carried out using questionnaire as a data gathering tool. Characteristics and features were identified through a comprehensive literature review combined with focus groups. Various design and pedagogy features were identified and the items were structured in a Likert Scale format. Respondents were asked to rate their preferences on a five-point scale, ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree, for each individual feature. Participants include 7 instructors and 50 students at Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU).An independent sample T-test was conducted to determine if there was a significant difference between the preferences of instructors and students on the rating of individual features. Scope: To better understand the design and pedagogy features of online instruction, India’s largest e-learning academic institution IGNOU was selected. Findings: Major findings include the high level of agreement on design and pedagogy features by instructors and students and the similarities in rank order by both students earning regular university credit and those pursuing professional development goals. When compared with the ranking of instructors and students, low preferences were being placed on social interactive features. Practical Implications: While there are many parallels between face-to-face teaching and online instruction, there are some differences also. Asynchronous online instruction must be designed in advance of being delivered.
9-22

REFERENCES

References: 

Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from
http://www.aln.org/publications/survey/pdf/staying_the_course.pdf
Alsultanny, Y.A. (2006). E-Learning System Overview based on Semantic Web. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 4(2), 111-118. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/volume4/issue2Hu, X. C. (2011). A Comparison of Student and Instructor Preferences for Design and Pedagogy Features in Postsecondary Online Courses. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 1(3), 1-17. DOI: 10.4018/ijopcd.2011070101
Kamsin, A. (2005). Is e-learning the solution and substitute for conventional learning? International journal of the computer, the internet and management, 13(3), 79-89. Retrieved from
http://www.ijcim.th.org/past_editions/2005V13N3/ijcimv13n3_article7.pdf
Karlsudd, P. & Tagerud, Y. (2008). Bridging the Gap - Taking the Distance out of e-Learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(1), 43-52. Retrieved from
http://www.ejel.org/volume6/issue1
Ku, H-Y. & Lohr, L. L. (2003). A Case Study of Chinese Students' Attitudes toward Their First Online Learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(3), 95-102. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504557
Kuriloff, P. (2005). Breaking the barriers of Time and Space: More effective Teaching using e-pedagogy. Innovate, 2(1). Retrieved May 13, 2010 from
http://innovateonline.info/pdf/vol2_issue1/Breaking_the_Barriers_of_Time...
Lim, C. P. (2004). Engaging learners in online learning environments. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 48(4), 16-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF02763440
Longmire, W., Tuso, G., & Wagner, E. D. (2000). Emerging Strategiesfor Effective E-Learning Solutions. In David Brightman (Ed.) Learning Without Limits (pp.3-5). San Francisco: Informania Inc.
Mortera-Gutierrez, F. (2006). Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-Learning and Face-to-Face Instruction. International Journal on E-Learning. 5 (3), 313-337.
Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning Styles and Effectiveness of Online and Face to Face Instruction. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99-113. DOI:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_4

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com