You are here

Home » Content

Aslantaş Baraj Gölü’ndeki (Osmaniye) Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Populasyonunun Bazı Morfometrik Özellikleri

Some Morphometric Properties of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Population in Aslantaş Dam Lake (Osmaniye)

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Eğirdir Fisheries Faculty

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Clarias gariepinus is cultivated, economically evaluated, and widely available in the inland waters of Çukurova region. Some morphometric properties of C. gariepinus population in Aslantaş Dam Lake were determined in December 2011. To this end, 26 fish samples were collected with the help of spreader cast net and various morphometric characteristics were identified. Morphometric data determined from these samples were presented as tables and figures. The mean total length and weight of fish caught have been determined as 383.65±6.367 mm and 472.40±11.56 g respectively. The total length-standard length relationship was calculated as TL=0.9831*SL-28.534 (R²=0.7897) using regression analysis. The data obtained are discussed in the light of current literature.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada Çukurova Bölgesi iç sularında yaygın olarak bulunan ve yetiştiriciliği yapılarak ekonomik olarak da değerlendirilen Aslantaş Baraj Gölü‟ndeki Clarias gariepinus populasyonunun bazı morfometrik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Aralık 2011 tarihinde Osmaniye ili sınırları içerisinde yer alan Aslantaş Barajı‟ndan serpme ağ yardımı ile toplanan toplam 26 adet balık örneğinde çeşitli morfometrik özellikler belirlenmiştir. Örneklerden saptanan morfometrik veriler tablo ve grafikler şeklinde sunulmuştur. Yakalanan balıklarda ortalama toplam boy ve ağırlık 383.65±6.367 mm ve 472.40±11.56 g olarak belirlenmiştir. Total boy - Standart boy ilişkisi regresyon analizi kullanılarak TB=0.9831*SB–28.534 (R²=0.7897) olarak hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler güncel literatür ışığında tartışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-aslantas-baraj-golundeki-osmaniye-clarias-gariepinus-burchell-1822-populasyonunun-bazi-morfometrik-ozellikleri.pdf
  • 1
1
7
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Agnese, J.F., Teugels, G.G., Galbusera, P., Guyomard, R.,Volckaert, F. 1997. Morphometric and Genetic Characterization of Sympatric Populations of Clarias gariepinus and C. anguillaris From Senegal. J. Fish Biol., 50: 1143-1157. Appelbaum, S., Kamler, E. 2000. Survival, Growth, Metabolism and Behaviour of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Early Stages Under Different Light Conditions. Aquacult. Eng., 22: 269-287. Bashir, F.H., Othman, M.S., Mazlan, A.G., Rahim, S.M., Simon K.D. 2013. Heavy Metal Concentration in Fishes From the Coastal Waters of Kapar and Mersing, Malaysia. Turkish J. Fish. and Aquat. Sci., 13: 375-382. Bembo, D.G., Carvalho, G.R., Cingolani, N., Arneri, E., Glanetti, G., Pitcher, T.J. 1996. Allozymic and Morphometrics Evidence for Two Stock of the European Anchovy (Engraulis encrosicolus) in Adriatic Waters. Mar. Biol., 126: 529-538. Economou, A.N., Giakoumi, S., Vardakas, L., Barbieri, R., Stoumboudi, M., Zogaris, S. 2007. The Freshwater Ichthyofauna of Greece-an Update Based on A Hydrographic Basin Survey. Medit. Mar. Sci., 8(1): 91-166. Ergene, S., Portakal, E., Karahan, A. 1999. Karyological Analysis and Body Proportion of Catfish (Clariidae, Clarias lazera, Valenciennes, 1840) in the Göksu Delta, Turkey. Tr. J. Zool., 23:423-426. Geldiay, R., Balık, S. 1998. Türkiye‟nin Tatlısu Balıkları. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Kitaplar Serisi, No: 37, İzmir. Gulland, J.A. 1969. “Manuel of Methods for Fish Stock Assesment” Part I, Fish Population Analysis, FAO. Man. Fish. Sci., 4:1-154. Haddon, M., Willis, T.J. 1995. Morphomtric and Meristic Comparison of Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus, Trachicthyidae) From Puysegur Bank and Lord-Howe-Rise, New Zealand, and Its Implications for Stock Structure. Mar. Biol., 123: 19-27. Kestemont, P., Didier, J., Depiereux, E., Micha, J.C. 2000. Selecting Ichthyological Metrics to Assess River Basin Ecological Quality. Arch. Hydrobiol., 121: 321-348.
B. Yeşilbudak, S.Duran, M. Tunçsoy, C. Erdem/ Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2):1-7 (2013)
7
Mina, M.V., Mironovsky, A.N., Golani, D. 2001. Consequances and Modes of Morfological Diversification of East African and Eurasion Barbins (genera Barbus, Varicorhinus and Capoeta) With Particular Reference to Barbus intermedius Complex. Environ. Biol. Fish., 61: 241-252. Mosquera, J., Gomez-Gesteira, M., Perez-Villar, V. 2000. Using Parasites as Biological Tags of Fish Populations: A Dynamical Model. Bull. Math. Biol., 62:87-99. Munsuz, N., Ünver, İ., Çaycı, G. 1999. Türkiye Suları. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Halkla İlişkiler ve Yayın Ünitesi, Ankara. Oluwafunmilola, F.O., Ryghtway, G. 2007. Biometry and Composition of Fish Species in Owena Reservoir, Ondo State, Nigeria. J. Cent. Eur. Agricult., 8(1): 99-104. Schaefer, S.A. 1991. Morphometric Investigations in Cyprinid Biology. In: Cyprinid Fishes, Systematics, Biology and Exploitation, Chapman and Hall, London, 52-82. Shepherd, G. 1991. Meristic and Morphometric Variation in Black Sea Bass North Cape Hatteras, North Caroline, Amer. J. Fish. Manag., 11:139-149. Swain, D.P., Foote, C.J. 1999. Stocks and Chameleons: The Use of Phenotypic Variation in Stock Identification. Fish. Res., 43(1-3):113-128. Teugels, G.G. 1996. Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Biogeography of Catfishes (Ostariophysi, Siluroidei): An Overview. In „The Biology and Culture of Catfishes‟ (Legendre M. & Proteau, J.-P., Eds). Aquat. Living Resour., 9(9):9-34.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com