You are here

Home » Content

Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse

Journal Name:

  • Selcuk Journal of Agriculture And Food Sciences

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Bacterial canker of tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michi-ganensis produces considerable economic losses in many countries because ef-fective control measures are lacking. In this study, the effectiveness of some chemicals, a plant growth regulator (Prohexadione-Ca (PC)), two plant activators (hydrogen peroxide (HP)) and harpin protein (Hrp), fungicides, maneb+copper (MC), copper compounds (copper sulfate pentahydrate (CSP) copper hydroxide (CH) and copper oxychloride (CO)) and an antibiotic, streptomycin sulphate on the pathogen were assessed in vitro and in vivo on two tomato cultivars, Newton and Orient. In Hrp and HP treated plants, reduction in disease severity (about 45%) was correlated with suppression of bacterial growth during the time course of infection. The activities of POX, GPX and PAL enzymes were determined at 5th day as markers of resistance and applications of Hrp, PC and HP induced a progressive and significant increase of both enzymes in locally treated tissues. Only PC treatments have decreased plant heights and the effectiveness of PC in reduction of plant heigths was up to 40%. Among copper compounds, CSP and CO combination with Maneb were the most effective on the disease severity (about 50%). In addition, CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PC significantly limited the pathogen population in vitro and they showed considerable effects on the disease symptoms compared with CSP alone. We conclude that Hrp, HP and PC may be useful in controlling external symptoms of this disease in greenhouses, and is environmentally friendly, reducing the amount of copper applied to crops.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-effects-tomato-bacterial-canker-resistance-inducers-and-copper-compounds-greenhouse.pdf
  • 1
1
10
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Anonymous (1996). Standard pesticide experiment methods to fire blight disease [E. amylovora (Burr.) Winslow et al.] on pears, quinces and apples. Stand-ard Pesticide Experiment Methods for Agricultural Control. Vol. 2, Plant Diseases. TAGEM, Ankara. 261 p.
Anonymous (2000). Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the intro-duction into the community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the community. Office for Official Publica-tions of the European Communities. Consolidated Text, pp. 1–39.
Bastas KK, Maden S (2004). Control of Fire Blight (Er-winia amylovora (Burr.) Winslow et al.) by Prohex-adione-Ca (BAS 125 10 W) and Benzothiadiazole + Metalaxyl (BION MX 44 WG). Selcuk University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 18 (33): 49 – 58.
Bastas KK, Maden S, Katırcioglu YZ, BoyrazN (2010). Determining of Application Time for Chemical Con-trol of Fire Blight Disease in Pear Varieties. Journal
9
KK Bastas / Selcuk J Agr Food Sci, 28(1):1-10
of Agricultural Sciences Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture 16 (3): 150-161.
Baysal O, Gursoy YZ, Ornek H, Duru A (2005). Induc-tion of oxidants in tomato leaves treated with DL-b-Amino butyric acid (BABA) and infected with Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. Michiganensis. Eu-ropean Journal of Plant Pathology 112: 361–369.
Bestwick CS, Brown IR, Mansfield JW (1998). Local-ized changes in peroxidase activity accompany hy-drogen peroxide generation during the development of a non-host hypersensitive reaction inlettuce. Plant Physiology 118:1067 – 1078.
Boudyach EH, Fatmi M, Akhayat O, Benizri E, Ait Ben Aoumar A (2001). Selection of antagonistic bacteria of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis and evaluation of their efficiency against bacterial canker of tomato. Biocontrol Science and Technol-ogy 11:141–149.
Bradford M (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein uti-lizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analyti-cal Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
Brisson LF, Tenhaken R, Lamb CJ (1994). Function of oxidative cross-linking of cell wall structural pro-teins in plant disease resistance. Plant Cell 6: 1703–1712.
Byers RE, Yoder KS (1997).The effect of Bas 125 W on apple tree growth, fruit quality and fire blight sup-pression. HortScience 32(3): 557
Carlton WM, Braun EJ, Gleason ML (1998). Ingress of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis into tomato leaves through hydathodes. Phyto-pathology 88: 525–529.
Costa G, Rademacher W (2006). Prohexadione-Ca: More than a growth regulator for pome fruit trees. Acta Horticulturae 727:107-116.
Dixon RA, Lamb CJ. (1990). Molecular communication in interaction between plants and microbial patho-gens. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 41: 339-367.
Dreier J, Bermpohl A, Eichenlaub R (1995). Southern hybridization and PCR for specific detection of phy-topathogenic Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Phytopathology 85:462–468.
El-Abyad MS, El-Sayed MA, El-Shanshoury AR, El-Sabbagh SM (1993). Towards the biological control of fungal and bacterial diseases of tomato using an-tagonistic Streptomyces spp. Plant Soil 149:185–195.
Evans JR, Evans R R, Regusci CL, Rademacher W (1999). Mode of action, metabolism and uptake of BAS 125W, prohexadione-calcium. HortScience 34 (7): 1200-1201.
Evans RR, JR Evans, Rademacher W (1997). Prohexa-dione calcium for suppression of vegetative growth in eastern apples. Acta Horticulturae 451: 663-666.
Gleason ML, Braun EJ, Carlton WM, Peterson RH (1991). Survival and Dissemination of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis in Tomatoes. Phytopathology 81(12): 1519-1523.
Gleason ML, Gitaitis RD, Ricker MD (1993). Recent Progress in Understanding and Controlling Bacterial Cancer of Tomato in Eastern North America. Plant Disease 77(11): 1069-1076.
Hahlbrock K, Scheel D (1989). Physiology and molecu-lar biology of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology 40:347–369.
Hausbeck MK, Bell J, Medina-Mora CM, Podolsky R, Fulbright DW (2000). Effect of bactericides on pop-ulation sizes and spread of Clavibacter michiganen-sis subsp. michiganensis on tomatoes in the green-house and on disease development and crop yield in the field. Phytopathology 90: 38–44.
Jones J (2001). Harpin, Biopesticides, Pesticide Outlook – August 2001The Royal Society of Chemistry DOI: 10.1039/b106934a.
Lamb CJ, Dixon RA (1997). The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance. Annual Review of Plant Physiol-ogy Plant Molecular Biology 48: 251–275.
Levine A, Tenhaken R, Dixon R, Lamb C (1994). H2O2 from the oxidative burst orchestrates the plant hyper-sensitive disease resistance response. Plant Cell 79: 583–593.
Maehly AC, Chance B (1954). The assay of catalases and peroxidases, 1: 357-424. In D. Glick (Ed.), Methods of Biochemical Analysis. Interscience Pub-lishers, Inc.
Mehdy MC, Sharma YK, Sathasivan K and Bays NW (1996). The role of activated oxygen species in plant disease resistance. Plant Physiology 365–374.
Momol MT, Ugine JD, Norelli JL, Aldwinckle HS (1999).The effect of prohexadione-Ca SAR inducers and calcium on the control of shoot blight caused by E. amylovora on apple. Acta Horticulturae 489: 601-605.
Newman SE, (2004). Disinfecting Irrigation Water for Disease Management 20th Annual Conference on Pest Management on Ornamentals February 20-22, 2004. Society of American Florists San Jose, Cali-fornia, 1-10.
Nicholson RL, Hammerschmidt R (1992). Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistance. An-nual Review of Phytopathology 30: 369–389.
Nunez NE, García N, Medina MG, Miranda R, Rodri-guez A, Hernandez D (2005). Efecto sobre el con-tenido de licopeno de tomate (Lycopersicon esculen-tum var. Gironda) sembrado en invernadero bajo diferentes sistemas de cultivo con y sin injerto. VII Congreso Nacional de Ciencia de los Alimentos y III Foro Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimen-tos, p.340-345.
10
KK Bastas / Selcuk J Agr Food Sci, 28(1):1-10
OEPP/EPPO, 2005. Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Bull. OEPP-EPPO Bull. 35, 275–283.
Padayatt SJ, Daruwala R, Wang Y, Eck PK, Song J, Koh WS, Levine M (2001). Vitamin C: From molecular actions to optimum intake, p.117-145. In: E. Caden-zad and I. Packer (eds.), Handbook of Antioxidants., 2nd ed. Washington. CRC Press.
Rademacher W (2000). Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic path-ways. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Mo-lecular Biology 51: 501-531.
Rademacher W (2004). Prohexadione-Ca induces re-sistance to fire blight and other diseases. EPPO Bull. 34: 379-384.
Ramireza H, Rancaño AJH, Benavides MA, Mendoza VR, Padron CE (2006). Influencia de promotores de oxidación controlada en hortalizas y su relación con antioxidantes. Journal Revista Chapingo Serie Hor-ticultura 12(2): 189-195.
Ryals JA, Neuenschwander UH, Willits MG, Molina A, Steiner HY, Hunt MD (1996). Systemic acquired re-sistance. Plant Cell 8: 1809–19.
Sherf BA, Bajar AM, Kollattukudy PE (1993). Abolu-tion of an inducible highly anionic peroxidase activ-ity in transgenic tomato. Plant Phsiology 101:201-208.
Soylu S, Baysal O, Soylu EM (2003). Induction of dis-ease resistance by the plant activator, acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM), against bacterial canker (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis) in tomato seedlings. Plant Science 165: 1069–1075.
Sticher L, Mauch-Mani B, Metraux JP (1997). Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Reiew of Plant Pathol-ogy 35: 235-270.
Strider DL (1969). Bacterial canker of tomato caused by Corynebacterium michiganense. A literature review and bibliography. N. C. Agric. Exp. Snt. Tech. Bull. 193.
Thyr BD (1969). Assaying Tomato Seed for Corynebac-terium michiganense. Plant Dis. Reptr. 53: 858-860.
Thyr BD, Webb RE, Jaworski CA, Ratcliffe TJ (1973). Tomato bacterial canker: control by seed treatment. Plant Disease Reporter 57: 974–977.
Tsiantos J (1987). Transmission of bacterium Coryne-bacterium michiganense pv. michiganense by seeds. Journal of Phytopathology 119: 142–6.
Umesha S (2006). Occurrence of bacterial canker in to-mato fields of Karnataka and effect of biological seed treatment on disease incidence. Crop Protec-tion 25: 375–381.
Umesha S (2006). Occurrence of bacterial canker in to-mato fields of Karnataka and effect of biological seed treatment on disease incidence. Crop Protec-tion 25: 375–381.
Wei ZM, Beer SV (1996). Harpin from Erwinia amylo-vora induces plant resistance. Acta Horticulturae 411: 223-225.
Werner NA, Fulbright DW, Podolsky R, Bell J, Hausbeck MK (2002). Limiting populations and spread of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michi-ganensis on seedling tomatoes in the greenhouse. Plant Disease 86: 535–542.
Wojtaszek P (1997). The oxidative burst: A plant’s early response against infection. Biochemistry Journal 322: 681–692.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com