You are here

DİNAMİK BİR YETENEK OLARAK TEKNOLOJİ YÖNETİMİ : TEKNOLOJİ YÖNETİMİ YETENEĞİ

TECNOLOGY MANAGEMENT AS A DYNAMIC CAPABILITY: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY MODEL

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Technology Management is a management discipline that is employed to adapt changing environmental conditions and technological progress as well as to create these transformations. Although Technology Management is a current and important discipline, it is not possible to say that there is a common understanding about Technology Management scope and boundaries. This paper examines Technology Management in the light of Dynamic Capabilities theory and propes a Technology Management Capability approach. The proposed approach will contribute to the development of a common understanding about Technology Management scope and boundaries besides developing an important reference point for the forthcoming Technology Management research.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Teknoloji Yönetimi, şirketlerin hızla değişen çevresel koşullara ve teknolojik gelişmelere ayak uydurabilmeleri ve hatta bu değişimleri bizzat yaratabilmeleri için başvurdukları bir yönetim disiplinidir. Teknoloji Yönetimi oldukça güncel ve önemli bir yönetim disiplini olmasına karşın, hâlâ Teknoloji Yönetimi disiplininin kapsamı ve sınırları konusunda ortak bir anlayışın oluştuğu söylenemez. Bu çalışmada Teknoloji Yönetimi disiplini, Dinamik Yetenekler teorisi ışığında ele alınmış ve Teknoloji Yönetimi Yeteneği kavramı geliştirilmiştir. Önerilen Teknoloji Yönetimi Yeteneği kavramının, Teknoloji Yönetimi disiplininin kapsam ve sınırları konusunda ortak bir anlayış oluşturma çabalarına katkıda bulunmasının yanı sıra; yeni bilimsel çalışmalar için de önemli bir referans noktası olacağı değerlendirilmektedir.
167-189

REFERENCES

References: 

ALLEN, Thomas J. ve SOSA, M. Lourdes. ’’50 Years of Engineering
Management Through the Lens of the IEEE Transactions’’, IEEE
Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 4, 2004, 391-395
ANSAL, Hacer; AYGOREN, Hayriye; EKMEKÇİ, Umut. ’’Research
Characteristics and Agenda of Technology Management Discipline
in Turkey’’, PICMET 2008 Proceedings, 27-31 Temmuz, 2008, 1973-
1984
BADAWAY, M. K., “A new paradigm for understanding management
technology: A research agenda for ‘technologists’”, International
Journal of Technology Management, 1996, 12(5/6), pp. 717-733
BALL, Derrick F. ve RIGBY, John. ’’Disseminating research in
management of technology: journals and authors’’, R&D
Management, 36, 2, 2006, 205-215
BEARD, J. W. ’’Management of Technology: A Three-Dimensional
Framework with Propositions for Further Research’’, Knowledge,
Technology & Policy, 15, 3, 2002, 45-58
BRENT, Alan C. ve PRETORIUS, Marthinus W. ’’Sustainable
development: A conceptual framework for the technology
management field of knowledge and a departure for further
research’’, 16th Annual Conference of the International-Association-for-
Management-of-Technology, May 2007, pp 623-642
CHARANON, J-J. ve GRANGE, T. ’’Towards a Re-definition of
Technology Management’’, IEEE International Conference on
Management of Innovation and Technology, 2006, 955-959
ÇETİNDAMAR, Dilek; CAN, Özge; PALA, Okan. ’’Technology
Management Activities and Tools: The Practice in Turkey’’,
PICMET 2006 Proceedings, 9-13 Temmuz, 2006, 92-98
ÜNSAL
187
ÇETİNDAMAR, Dilek; PHAAL, Robert; PROBERT, David. ’’Understanding
technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for
technology management activities’’, Technovation, 29, 2009a, 237-
246
ÇETİNDAMAR, D.; WASTI, S. N.; ANSAL, H.; BEYHAN, B. ’’Does
technology management research diverge or converge in
developing and developed countries’’, Technovation, 29, 2009b, 45-
58
EDLER, J.; F. MEYER-KRAHMER; REGER, G., “Changes in the
strategic management of technology: results of global
bencmarking study”, R&D Management, 2002, 32(2):149-65
EISENHARDT, Kathleen, M. ve MARTIN, Jeffrey A. ’’Dynamic
Capabilities: What are they?’’, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 10-
11, 2000, 1105-1121
GREGORY, M. J. ’’Technology management : a process approach’’,
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 209, 1995, 347-
356
KALAYCI, Orhan. ’’Yöneticiler için Doğru Sorular CMMI’’, Shamrock
Process Improvement and Innovation, Toronto, 2007
JILIANG, Wang; WEIWEI, Wu; BO, Yu. ’’Technology Management
Maturity of Enterprises: An Analysis Based on Four Industries in
China’’, PICMET Proceedings, Portland - USA, 5-9 Ağustos 2007, 31-
37
KHALIL, T. ve BAYRAKTAR, B.A.. ’’Management of Technology, the Key
to Global Competitiveness’’, Proceedings, 2nd International
Conference on Management of Technology, Miami, 28 Şubat – 8 Mart,
1990
KHAN, Mohsin U. ’’Dynamic techno-management capability of Indian
computer firms in comparison with Korea’’, Technovation, 19, 4,
1999, 243-259
MACHER, Jeffrey T. ve MOWERY, David C. ’’Measuring Dynamic
Capabilities: Practices and Performance in Semiconductor
Manufacturing’’, British Journal of Management, 20, 2009, 41-62
MACPHERSON, Allan; JONES, Oswald; ZHANG, Michael. ’’Evolution or
revolution? Dynamic capabilities in a knowledge-dependent firm’’,
R&D Management, 34, 2, 2004, 161-177
MERINO, M. Teresa Garcia; CARMO, M. Liduina Pereira; ALVAREZ, M.
Valle Santos. ’’25 years of Technovation: characterisation and
evolution of the journal”, Technovation, 26, 2006, 1303-1316
JIN, J. ve ZEDTWITZ, M. von. ’’Technological capability development
in China’s mobile phone industry’’,Technovation, 28, 2008, 327-334
ÜNSAL
188
LEVIN, D. Z. ve BARNARD, H. ’’Technology management routines that
matter technology managers’’, International Journal of Technology
Management, 41,1-2, 2008, 22-37
LIAO, Shu-hsien. ’’Technology management methodologies and
applications: A literature review form 1995 to 2003’’, Technovation,
25, 2005, 381-393
MINER, A. S. ’’Organizational evolution and social ecology of jobs’’,
American Socilogical Review, 56, 1991, 772-785
PAVITT, K. ’’Innovating routines in the business firm: what corporates
task should they be accomplishg?’’, Industrial and Corporate
Change, 11, 2002, 117-123
PENG, David Xiaosong, SCHROEDER, Roger G., SHAH, Rachna.
’’Linking routines to operation capabilities: A new perspective’’,
Journal of Operations Management, 26, 2008, 730-748
PHAAL, Robert; FARRUKH, Clare J. P.; PROBERT, David R.
’’Technology management tools: concept, development and
application’’, Technovation, 26, 2006, 336-344
PILKINGTON, Alan. ’’ Engineering management or management of
technology? A bibliometric study of IEEE TEM’’, International
Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3, 1,
2008, 63-70
PILKINGTON, Alan ve TEICHERT, Thorsten. ’’Management of
technology: themes, concepts and relationships’’, Technovation,
26, 2006, 288-299
ROBERTS, Edward B. ’’A Perspective 50 Years of Engineering
Management Field’’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,
51, 4, 2004, 398-403
RUBENSTEIN, Al H. ’’50 Years of Engineering and Technology
Management’’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 4,
2004, 407-408
RUSH, H.; BESSANT, J.; HOBDAY, M. ’’Assesing the technological
capabilities of firms: developing a policy tool’’, R&D Management,
37, 3, 2007, 221-236
SKILBECK, John N. ve CRUICKSHANK, Craig M. ’’A Framework for
Evaluating Technology Management Process’’, Portland
International Conference on Management and Technology, 27-31
Temmuz 1997, 138-142
TEECE, David. ’’Explicating dynamic capabilities, the nature and
microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance”,
Strategic Management Journal, 28, 2007, 1319-1350
ÜNSAL
189
TEECE, David ve PISANO, Gary. ’’The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms:
an Introduction”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 3, 1994, 537-
556
TEECE, David; PISANO, Gary; SHUEN, Amy. ’’ Dynamic Capabilities
and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7,
1997, 509-553
ZOLLO, M. ve WINTER, S. G. ’’Deliberate learning and evolution of
dynamic capabilities’’, Organization Science, 13, 2002, 339-351

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com