You are here

Home » Content

Sağlık hizmetlerinin kalitesinde geçerli ve güvenilir soru formu geliştirme yöntemleri

Developing a valid and reliable questionnaire for healthcare quality research

Journal Name:

  • Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015
DOI: 
10.5455/sad.20151444303534

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Quantitative research methodology focuses on objective interpretation and has a prediction element based on the data provided.To be able to conduct a quantitative type of study, a data collection tool should be designed. This paper overviews a practical and methodological example of designing a valid and reliable data collection instrument for purposes of quantitative studies in healthcare quality research.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kantitatif araştırma yöntemi, objektif değerlendirmeye odaklıdır ve en önemli öngörüsü sunulan dataya dayalıdır. Kantitatif tipte bir araştırma gerçekleştirebilmek için etkin bir veri toplama aracı geliştirilmesi zorunludur. Bu makalede, sağlıkta kalitede kantitatif bir araştırma gerçekleştirebilmek için gerekli olan veriyi toplamada geçerli ve güvenilir bir anket formu geliştirme yöntemleri örneklerle açık lanacaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-saglik-hizmetlerinin-kalitesinde-gecerli-guvenilir-soru-formu-gelistirme-yontemleri.pdf
  • 2
111
117
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Tashakkori, A. & Newman, I. (2010). Mixed Methods:
Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to
Research. In McGaw, B., Baker, E. & Peterson, P. P. (Eds)
International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd Edition).
2. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative,
quantitative and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications.
3. Institute of Medicine Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New
Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press; 2001.
4. Joint Commission International. (2011). Joint Commission
International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals.
Oakbrook, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health
care Organizations.
5. Joint Commission. (2012). Sentinel Events Statistics
Retrieved January 1, 2014 from http://www.jointcommission.
org/assets/1/18/Summary_1Q_20121.PDF
6. McLaughlin, C.P. &Kaluzny, A.D. (1999) Continuous Quality
Improvement in Health Care: Theory, Implementation, and
Applications 2nd Edition, USA, Aspen Publishers.
7. Polit D. F.,Beck C. T.(2006).The content validity index:
Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique
and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29,
Table 1. Number of GCC hospitals that responded and the percentage of responding hospitals.
Country Number of JCIaccredited
hospitals
Number of hospitals that
replied Response rate
Saudi Arabia 34 31 91.17%
United Arab Emirates 32 27 84.375
Qatar 5 5 100%
State of Kuwait 2 2 100%
Total 73 65 89.04%
Health Care Acad J ● 2015 ● Vol 2 ● Issue 2 115
Asaad Abdulrahman Abduljawad : Developing a valid and reliable questionnaire for healthcare quality research
489-497
8. Berwick, D. M. (2002). A user’s manual for the IOM’s ‘Quality
Chasm’ report. Health Affairs, 21(3), 80-90
9. Tavakol, M. Dennick, R. (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s
alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 2:53-55
10. Joint Commission International. (2014). Retrieved January
1, 2014 from http://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/
JCI-Accredited-Organizations/.
11. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to
its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 219–250.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com