You are here

Home » Content

Exploring Emotional Intelligence of the Sin Industries' Stakeholders with respect to US Market

Journal Name:

  • Review Of Research

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
This paper proposes a conceptual framework for understanding the causal factors influencing conflicts that evolve in Gambling industries. The stakeholder emotional intelligence framework assesses two critical factors – emotional intensity and stakeholder power – that influence how an issue gets defined in the general public and ultimately resolved with policymakers over the lifecycle of the issue. Psychophysiological Experience is emotions caused by the internal and external influences interacting with every individual's state of mind. Individuals must equip ability to handle the same in effective and efficient ways with respect to environments and situations, which is termed as Emotional Intelligence.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-exploring-emotional-intelligence-sin-industries-stakeholders-respect-us-market.pdf
  • 4
1
8
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Fox, C. and Miller, H. (1996), Postmodern
Public Administration: Toward Discourse, Sage
Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
2. Fr e ema n , R. ( 1 9 8 4 ), Str a t e g i c
Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman,
Boston, MA.
3. Mintzberg, H. (1994), The Rise and Fall of
Strategic Planning, The Free Press, New York, NY.
4. Mucciaroni, G. (1995), Reversals of
Fortune: Public Policy and Private Interests, The
Brookings Institution,Washington, DC.
5. Rochefort, D. and Cobb, R. (1994), The
Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy
Agenda, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence,
KS.
6. R u e t e r s ( 1 9 9 8 ) , ' ' R J R e x e c
blastsWashington over tobacco bill'', Rueters, 24
April.
7. Schattschneider, E. (1960), The
Semisovereign People, Holt, Rinehart
andWinston, New York, NY.
8. Stone, D. (1988), Policy Paradox and
Political Reason, Scott Foresman/Little, Brown,
Glenview, IL.
9. Waddock, S. and Bodwell, C. (2004),
''Managing responsibility: what can be learned
from the quality movement'', California
Management Review, Vol. 47 No. 1, p. 35.
10. Wheelen, T. and Hunger, J. (2004),
Strategic Management and Business Policy,
Pearson Prentice- Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
11. Smart, J. (1973), Utilitarianism For and
Against, Cambridge University Press, New York,
NY.
12. Smith, A. (1776), Wealth of Nations,
Everyman, London.
13. Smith, N.C. and Quelch, J. (1993), Ethics
in Marketing, Irwin, Homewood, IL.
14. St. Louis Post Dispatch (1999a),
''Concealed weapons ban has been a good idea
since 1875'', St. Louis Post Dispatch, 11 February.
15. St. Louis Post Dispatch (1999b), ''NRA
gives $75,000 to support gun bill in Missouri'', St.
Louis Post Dispatch, 18 January.
16. St. Louis Post Dispatch (1999c),
''Proponents paid out $3.8 Million for proposition
B'', St. Louis Post Dispatch, 6 May.
17. St. Louis Post Dispatch (1999d),
''Proposition B: more security or greater danger?
Clear evidence from states with concealed carry'',
St. Louis Post Dispatch, 22 March. The Associated
Press (1998), ''Educators just glad boats in moats
debate is over'', The Associated Press, 5
November. Velasquez, M. (1982), Business
Ethics: Concepts and Cases, Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Wall Street Journal (1987), ''Lawmakers
focus on big boost in excise taxes to reduce the
deficit, despite heated opposition'', Wall Street
Journal, 18 June.
19. Wall Street Journal (2005), ''Bush lawyers
target gun control's legal rationale'', Wall Street
Journal, 7 January.
20. Wildavsky, A. (1979), Speaking Truth to
Power, Little, Brown, Boston, MA.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com