Alwin D. F. (1992), "Information Transmission in the Survey Interview: Number of Response Categories and the Reliability of Attitude Measurement", Sociological Methodology, Vol. 22. pp. 83-118.
Birkett. Nicholas J. (1986), "Selecting the Number of Response Categories for a Likert-Type Scale",. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association. Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
Chang, L.(1994), "A Psychometric Evaluation Of 4-Point And 6-Point Likert-Type Scales In Relation To Reliability And Validity", Applied Psychological Measurement, v.18, n.3, ss.205-215
Churchill, G.A. and Peter, J.P(1984), "Research Design Effects On The Reliability Of Rating Scales: A Meta Analysis", Journal Of Marketing Research, November, ss.360-375
Cicchetti, D.V. Showalter, D. and Tyrer, P.J. (1985), "The Effect Of Number Of Rating Scale Categories On Level Of Interrater Reliability: A Monte Carlo Investigation", Applied Psyhological Measurement, v.9, n.l, March, ss.31-36
Cox, E.P.III (1980), "The Optima! Number Of Response Alternatives", Journal Of Marketing Research, Vol.17, November, ss.407-422
Dawis, R.V.,(1987) "Scale Construction", Journal Of Counseling Psychology, v.34(4), ss.48M89
Dutton & Blum (1968) "The Measurement Of Attitudes Toward Arithmetic With A Likert-Type Test", The Elementary School Journal, February, ss.259-264
Friedman, L.W. & Friedman H.H.(1986), "Comparison Of Itemized vs Graphic Rating Scales: A Validity Approach", Journal Of The Market Research Society, v.28, n.3, ss.285-289
Gren,
P.E.(1970)
, "Rating Scales And Informatio Recovery -How Many Scales And Response Categories To Use", Journal Of Marketing, v.34, ss.33-39
Jacoby, J. ve Matell, M.S.(1971) "Three-Point Scales Are Good Enough", Journal Of Marketing Research, n.8, November, ss.495-500
Jensen C. and Tendering, J.(2005) "Perceived Prominence And Scale Types", FONETIC 2005, proceedings, Göteborg University, ss.111-114
ISSN: 1308-2922
19
Pamukkalc Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
TEMMUZ 2009 SAYI 4
Lehmann, D.R., & Hulbert, J.(1972), "Are Three - Point Scales Always Good Enough", Journal Of Marketing Research, v.9, November, ss. 444-446
Masters, J.R.(1974), "The Relationship Between Number Of Response Categories And Reliablity Of Likert-Type Questionnaires", Journal Of Educational Mesasurement, v.ll, n.l, Spring
Miller, G.A.(1956), "The Magical Number Seven, Plus Or Minus Two: Some Limits On Our Capacity For Processing Information", The Pychological Review, v.63, ss:81-97
Peterson, R.A.(1994) "A Meta-Analysis Of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha", Journal Of Consumer Research, v.21, September, ss.381-391
Preston C.C and Colman A.M.(2000) "Optimal Number Of Response Categories In Rating Scales: Reliability, Validity And Discriminating Power And Respondent Preferences", Acta Psyhologica, 104, ss. 1-15
Scherpenzeel, A., "Why Use 11-Point Scale" Retrieved 03/11/2008 from: http://www.swisspanel.ch/fiIe/doc/faq/l lpointscales.pdf
Viswanathan, M., Sudman, S. and Johnson, M. (2004) "Maximum Versus Meaningful Discrimination In Scale Response: Implications For Validity Of Measurement Of Consumer Perceptions About Products", Journal Of Business Research, 57, ss 108-124
Weathers, D., Sharma, S. and Niedrich R.W.(2005) "The Impact Of The Number Of Scale Points, Dispositional Factors, And The Status Quo Decision Heuristic On Scale Reliability And Response Accuracy", Journal Of Business Research, v.58, ss.1516-1524
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
